Towards a Wearable Augmented Reality Visor for High-Precision Manual Tasks

N. Cattari, Roberta Piazza, R. D’amato, Benish Fida, M. Carbone, S. Condino, F. Cutolo, V. Ferrari
{"title":"Towards a Wearable Augmented Reality Visor for High-Precision Manual Tasks","authors":"N. Cattari, Roberta Piazza, R. D’amato, Benish Fida, M. Carbone, S. Condino, F. Cutolo, V. Ferrari","doi":"10.1109/MeMeA49120.2020.9137253","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Augmented Reality (AR) systems based on head-mounted displays intrinsically provide the user with an egocentric and natural viewpoint, and for this reason they are deemed as the most efficient solution for those tasks manually performed under user’s direct vision. They are commonly classified according to the AR paradigm implemented: Video See-Through (VST) and Optical See-Through (OST). A current research goal for these systems is to determine either of which of the two modalities is to be considered the best solution for the guidance of high-precision manual tasks. To answer this question, in this paper we report the outcomes of two user studies performed by our research team that involved a commercially available OST (Microsoft HoloLens) and a customized new-concept VST head-mounted display. The average error in tracing a line under AR aid is considerably inferior in VST user study than the one performed with OST device (1 mm and 5.8 mm, respectively). However, some of the advantages offered by OST device are not negligible, thus a hybrid solution implementing the two paradigms can overcome the limitations of both technologies.","PeriodicalId":152478,"journal":{"name":"2020 IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications (MeMeA)","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications (MeMeA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MeMeA49120.2020.9137253","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Augmented Reality (AR) systems based on head-mounted displays intrinsically provide the user with an egocentric and natural viewpoint, and for this reason they are deemed as the most efficient solution for those tasks manually performed under user’s direct vision. They are commonly classified according to the AR paradigm implemented: Video See-Through (VST) and Optical See-Through (OST). A current research goal for these systems is to determine either of which of the two modalities is to be considered the best solution for the guidance of high-precision manual tasks. To answer this question, in this paper we report the outcomes of two user studies performed by our research team that involved a commercially available OST (Microsoft HoloLens) and a customized new-concept VST head-mounted display. The average error in tracing a line under AR aid is considerably inferior in VST user study than the one performed with OST device (1 mm and 5.8 mm, respectively). However, some of the advantages offered by OST device are not negligible, thus a hybrid solution implementing the two paradigms can overcome the limitations of both technologies.
面向高精度手工任务的可穿戴增强现实遮阳板
基于头戴式显示器的增强现实(AR)系统本质上为用户提供了一个以自我为中心的自然视角,因此它们被认为是在用户直接视觉下手动执行任务的最有效解决方案。它们通常根据实现的AR范例进行分类:视频透明(VST)和光学透明(OST)。这些系统目前的研究目标是确定两种模式中的哪一种被认为是高精度手动任务指导的最佳解决方案。为了回答这个问题,在本文中,我们报告了我们的研究团队进行的两项用户研究的结果,其中涉及商用OST(微软HoloLens)和定制的新概念VST头戴式显示器。在VST用户研究中,AR辅助下追踪线的平均误差明显低于OST设备(分别为1 mm和5.8 mm)。然而,OST器件提供的一些优势不容忽视,因此实现两种范式的混合解决方案可以克服两种技术的局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信