A Critical Review of CO2 Enhanced Oil Recovery in Tight Oil Reservoirs of North America and China

Zhaojie Song, Yilei Song, Yuzhen Li, B. Bai, Kaoping Song, J. Hou
{"title":"A Critical Review of CO2 Enhanced Oil Recovery in Tight Oil Reservoirs of North America and China","authors":"Zhaojie Song, Yilei Song, Yuzhen Li, B. Bai, Kaoping Song, J. Hou","doi":"10.2118/196548-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Primary oil recovery remains less than 10% in tight oil reservoirs, even after expensive multistage horizontal well hydraulic fracturing stimulation. Substantial experiments and pilot tests have been performed to investigate CO2-EOR potential in tight reservoirs; however, some results conflict with each other. The objective of this paper is to diagnose how these conflicting results occurred and to identify a way to narrow the gap between experimental results and field performance through a comprehensive literature review and data analysis.\n Peer-reviewed journal papers, technical reports, and SPE publications were collected, and three key steps were taken to reach our goal. First, rock and fluid properties of tight reservoirs in North America and China were compared, and their potential effect on tight oil production was analyzed. Afterward, based on published experimental studies and simulation works, the CO2-EOR mechanisms were discussed, including molecular diffusion, CO2-oil interaction considering nanopore confinement, and CO2-fluid-rock minerals interaction. Subsequently, pilot projects were examined to understand the gap between laboratory works and field tests, and the challenges faced in China's tight oil exploitation were rigorously analyzed.\n Compared with Bakken and Eagle Ford formation, China's tight oil reservoirs feature higher mud content and oil viscosity while they have a lower brittleness index and formation pressure, leading to confined stimulated reservoir volume and further limited CO2-oil contact. The effect of CO2 molecular diffusion was relatively exaggerated in experimental results, which could be attributed to the dual restrictions of exposure time and oil-CO2 area in field scale. Numerical modeling showed that the improved phase properties in nanopores led to enhanced oil recovery. The development of nano-scale chips withholding high pressure/temperature may advance the experimental study on nano-confinement's effect. Oil recovery can be further enhanced through wettability alteration due to CO2 adsorption on nanopores and reaction with rock minerals. CO2 huff-n-puff operations were more commonly applied in North America than China, and the huff time is in the order of 10 days, but the soaking time is less. Conformance control was essential during CO2 flooding in order to delay gas breakthrough and promote CO2-oil interaction. There is less than 5% of tight oil reserve surrounded by CO2 reservoirs in China, limiting the application of CO2-EOR technologies. An economic incentive from the government is necessary to consider the application of CO2 from power plants, refineries, etc.\n This work provides an explanation of conflicting results from different research methods and pilot tests, and helps researchers and oil operators understand where and when the CO2-EOR can be best applied in unconventional reservoirs. New directions for future work on CO2-EOR in tight formations are also recommended.","PeriodicalId":415055,"journal":{"name":"Day 1 Tue, October 29, 2019","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"92","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 1 Tue, October 29, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/196548-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 92

Abstract

Primary oil recovery remains less than 10% in tight oil reservoirs, even after expensive multistage horizontal well hydraulic fracturing stimulation. Substantial experiments and pilot tests have been performed to investigate CO2-EOR potential in tight reservoirs; however, some results conflict with each other. The objective of this paper is to diagnose how these conflicting results occurred and to identify a way to narrow the gap between experimental results and field performance through a comprehensive literature review and data analysis. Peer-reviewed journal papers, technical reports, and SPE publications were collected, and three key steps were taken to reach our goal. First, rock and fluid properties of tight reservoirs in North America and China were compared, and their potential effect on tight oil production was analyzed. Afterward, based on published experimental studies and simulation works, the CO2-EOR mechanisms were discussed, including molecular diffusion, CO2-oil interaction considering nanopore confinement, and CO2-fluid-rock minerals interaction. Subsequently, pilot projects were examined to understand the gap between laboratory works and field tests, and the challenges faced in China's tight oil exploitation were rigorously analyzed. Compared with Bakken and Eagle Ford formation, China's tight oil reservoirs feature higher mud content and oil viscosity while they have a lower brittleness index and formation pressure, leading to confined stimulated reservoir volume and further limited CO2-oil contact. The effect of CO2 molecular diffusion was relatively exaggerated in experimental results, which could be attributed to the dual restrictions of exposure time and oil-CO2 area in field scale. Numerical modeling showed that the improved phase properties in nanopores led to enhanced oil recovery. The development of nano-scale chips withholding high pressure/temperature may advance the experimental study on nano-confinement's effect. Oil recovery can be further enhanced through wettability alteration due to CO2 adsorption on nanopores and reaction with rock minerals. CO2 huff-n-puff operations were more commonly applied in North America than China, and the huff time is in the order of 10 days, but the soaking time is less. Conformance control was essential during CO2 flooding in order to delay gas breakthrough and promote CO2-oil interaction. There is less than 5% of tight oil reserve surrounded by CO2 reservoirs in China, limiting the application of CO2-EOR technologies. An economic incentive from the government is necessary to consider the application of CO2 from power plants, refineries, etc. This work provides an explanation of conflicting results from different research methods and pilot tests, and helps researchers and oil operators understand where and when the CO2-EOR can be best applied in unconventional reservoirs. New directions for future work on CO2-EOR in tight formations are also recommended.
北美和中国致密油CO2提高采收率研究综述
在致密油油藏中,即使经过昂贵的多级水平井水力压裂增产,一次采收率仍低于10%。为了研究致密储层的二氧化碳提高采收率潜力,已经进行了大量的实验和先导试验;然而,有些结果相互冲突。本文的目的是诊断这些相互冲突的结果是如何发生的,并通过全面的文献综述和数据分析,确定一种缩小实验结果和现场表现之间差距的方法。我们收集了同行评议的期刊论文、技术报告和SPE出版物,并采取了三个关键步骤来实现我们的目标。首先,对比了北美和中国致密储层的岩石和流体性质,并分析了它们对致密油生产的潜在影响。随后,基于已发表的实验研究和模拟工作,讨论了CO2-EOR机制,包括分子扩散、考虑纳米孔约束的co2 -油相互作用以及co2 -流体-岩石矿物相互作用。随后,对试点项目进行了审查,以了解实验室工作与现场测试之间的差距,并对中国致密油开发面临的挑战进行了严格分析。与Bakken和Eagle Ford地层相比,中国致密油储层的泥含量和油粘度更高,而脆性指数和地层压力更低,导致增产储层体积受限,进一步限制了co2 -油接触。实验结果中CO2分子扩散的影响相对夸大,这可能是由于暴露时间和油田-CO2面积的双重限制。数值模拟表明,纳米孔中相性质的改善提高了原油采收率。耐高压/耐高温纳米级芯片的发展可能会促进纳米约束效应的实验研究。纳米孔对CO2的吸附以及与岩石矿物的反应可使润湿性发生改变,从而进一步提高采收率。与中国相比,北美采用CO2加热炉操作更为普遍,加热炉时间在10天左右,但保温时间较短。在CO2驱油过程中,为了延迟气侵并促进CO2-油相互作用,一致性控制至关重要。中国致密油储量不足5%被CO2油藏包围,限制了CO2- eor技术的应用。考虑发电厂、炼油厂等的二氧化碳应用,政府的经济激励是必要的。这项工作解释了不同研究方法和试验结果之间的矛盾,并帮助研究人员和油公司了解二氧化碳提高采收率在非常规油藏中的最佳应用地点和时间。提出了今后致密地层co2提高采收率工作的新方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信