Team Teaching “Gender Perspectives”: A Reflection on Feminist Pedagogy in the Interdisciplinary Classroom

Kristine De Welde, Nicola Foote, Michelle Hayford, Martha Rosenthal
{"title":"Team Teaching “Gender Perspectives”: A Reflection on Feminist Pedagogy in the Interdisciplinary Classroom","authors":"Kristine De Welde, Nicola Foote, Michelle Hayford, Martha Rosenthal","doi":"10.5406/FEMTEACHER.23.2.0105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"© 2014 by the board of trustees of the university of ill inois This paper explores the potential of collaborative interdisciplinary teaching as a mechanism for advancing feminist pedagogies. The authors, individually and collectively, engage in feminist academic work (e.g., scholarship and teaching) that challenges traditional academic expectations in our disciplines and at our institution. We do this in spite of our understanding that power relations within the academy and in traditional academic disciplines tend to marginalize methodologies that promote emancipatory and progressive ideas (see Katuna). Furthermore, we embrace academic feminism, particularly in the classroom, as having interdisciplinary potential in its ability to draw from multiple fields of thought simultaneously to help students develop critical approaches that ultimately contribute to equity and equality, within and beyond the academy. Interdisciplinarity is central to the transformative goals of women’s/gender studies, given the multi-faceted and deeply layered nature of gender construction. Feminist scholars have expressed the hope that challenging disciplinary boundaries will allow fuller methodologies to come to fruition and disrupt authoritative power structures within the academy. However, the extent to which the interdisciplinary promise of women’s/gender studies has been fulfilled in practice has been called into question. In an important Feminist Studies forum (2001), a group of feminist scholars challenged the interdisciplinarity of feminist scholarship and teaching, noting that most of these activities are typically “either disciplinary or multidisciplinary, combining disciplines in a fashion that is additive rather than integrative” (Finger and Rosner 499). Some of this can be explained as a reflection of structural realities within the academy, where job prospects in interdisciplinary fields are limited and true interdisciplinarity remains under suspicion: universities will not give up the prioritization of traditional disciplines (Katz 519). This is consequential because the inherent interdisciplinarity of women’s and gender studies has the radical potential to resist entrenched academic boundaries and to create interstitial scholarship. As Anke Finger and Victoria Rosner state, “Feminists can use interdisciplinary scholarship to challenge the forms knowledge takes in Team Teaching “Gender Perspectives”: A Reflection on Feminist Pedagogy in the Interdisciplinary Classroom","PeriodicalId":287450,"journal":{"name":"Feminist Teacher","volume":"69 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Feminist Teacher","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5406/FEMTEACHER.23.2.0105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

© 2014 by the board of trustees of the university of ill inois This paper explores the potential of collaborative interdisciplinary teaching as a mechanism for advancing feminist pedagogies. The authors, individually and collectively, engage in feminist academic work (e.g., scholarship and teaching) that challenges traditional academic expectations in our disciplines and at our institution. We do this in spite of our understanding that power relations within the academy and in traditional academic disciplines tend to marginalize methodologies that promote emancipatory and progressive ideas (see Katuna). Furthermore, we embrace academic feminism, particularly in the classroom, as having interdisciplinary potential in its ability to draw from multiple fields of thought simultaneously to help students develop critical approaches that ultimately contribute to equity and equality, within and beyond the academy. Interdisciplinarity is central to the transformative goals of women’s/gender studies, given the multi-faceted and deeply layered nature of gender construction. Feminist scholars have expressed the hope that challenging disciplinary boundaries will allow fuller methodologies to come to fruition and disrupt authoritative power structures within the academy. However, the extent to which the interdisciplinary promise of women’s/gender studies has been fulfilled in practice has been called into question. In an important Feminist Studies forum (2001), a group of feminist scholars challenged the interdisciplinarity of feminist scholarship and teaching, noting that most of these activities are typically “either disciplinary or multidisciplinary, combining disciplines in a fashion that is additive rather than integrative” (Finger and Rosner 499). Some of this can be explained as a reflection of structural realities within the academy, where job prospects in interdisciplinary fields are limited and true interdisciplinarity remains under suspicion: universities will not give up the prioritization of traditional disciplines (Katz 519). This is consequential because the inherent interdisciplinarity of women’s and gender studies has the radical potential to resist entrenched academic boundaries and to create interstitial scholarship. As Anke Finger and Victoria Rosner state, “Feminists can use interdisciplinary scholarship to challenge the forms knowledge takes in Team Teaching “Gender Perspectives”: A Reflection on Feminist Pedagogy in the Interdisciplinary Classroom
团队教学“性别视角”:跨学科课堂中女性主义教学法的反思
本文探讨了跨学科协作教学作为推进女权主义教学法的一种机制的潜力。作者个人或集体从事女权主义学术工作(例如,奖学金和教学),挑战我们学科和我们机构的传统学术期望。我们这样做,尽管我们理解,在学术界和传统学术学科中的权力关系倾向于边缘化促进解放和进步思想的方法(见卡图纳)。此外,我们拥抱学术女权主义,特别是在课堂上,因为它具有跨学科的潜力,能够同时从多个领域汲取思想,帮助学生发展批判性方法,最终促进学术界内外的公平和平等。鉴于性别建构的多面性和深层性,跨学科是妇女/性别研究变革目标的核心。女权主义学者表示,希望挑战学科界限将使更全面的方法开花结果,并破坏学术界的权威权力结构。但是,妇女/性别研究的跨学科前景在实践中实现的程度受到质疑。在一个重要的女权主义研究论坛上(2001年),一群女权主义学者对女权主义学术和教学的跨学科性提出了挑战,指出这些活动大多是典型的“要么是学科,要么是多学科,以一种附加而不是整合的方式将学科结合起来”(Finger and Rosner 499)。其中一些可以解释为学院内部结构现实的反映,跨学科领域的就业前景有限,真正的跨学科仍然受到怀疑:大学不会放弃传统学科的优先次序(Katz 519)。这是重要的,因为妇女和性别研究固有的跨学科性具有彻底的潜力,可以抵制根深蒂固的学术界限,创造间隙性的学术。正如安克芬格(Anke Finger)和维多利亚罗斯纳(Victoria Rosner)所说,“女权主义者可以利用跨学科的学术来挑战团队教学中知识的形式”
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信