The insufficiency of single point diffusive air flow integrity testing.

T H Meltzer
{"title":"The insufficiency of single point diffusive air flow integrity testing.","authors":"T H Meltzer","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Filter manufacturers characterize a given filter type by a single acceptable maximum diffusive air flow level. A too high value is prudently rejected as signalling the possible presence of flaws. Values lower than the stipulated maximum are accepted. However, the presence of single pores, whatever their sizes, is not being revealed. Only their influence within the total porosity is measured by the diffusive air flow. Single point diffusive air flow integrity testing may invite misleading conclusions because it offers possibilities for lower air flows to mask the presence of flaws or of outsized pores. This is particularly so where initial (prefiltration) and final integrity are being compared. The filtrative accretion of retained material, viable or not, must inevitably come to block or diminish the size of the pores. This results in decreased total porosity, directly expressed in lower diffusive air flow values. Sufficient drop in such final air flow values may mask the presence of a flaw developed in the filter subsequent to its initial testing. For this reason a filter's entire air flow permeation curve, particularly including its bubble point, must be characterized. It is this measurement, and this measurement alone, that is capable of unambiguously revealing the existence of insufficiently retentive pores. The inquiry into such presence is the very purpose of filter integrity testing.</p>","PeriodicalId":16667,"journal":{"name":"Journal of parenteral science and technology : a publication of the Parenteral Drug Association","volume":"46 1","pages":"19-21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of parenteral science and technology : a publication of the Parenteral Drug Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Filter manufacturers characterize a given filter type by a single acceptable maximum diffusive air flow level. A too high value is prudently rejected as signalling the possible presence of flaws. Values lower than the stipulated maximum are accepted. However, the presence of single pores, whatever their sizes, is not being revealed. Only their influence within the total porosity is measured by the diffusive air flow. Single point diffusive air flow integrity testing may invite misleading conclusions because it offers possibilities for lower air flows to mask the presence of flaws or of outsized pores. This is particularly so where initial (prefiltration) and final integrity are being compared. The filtrative accretion of retained material, viable or not, must inevitably come to block or diminish the size of the pores. This results in decreased total porosity, directly expressed in lower diffusive air flow values. Sufficient drop in such final air flow values may mask the presence of a flaw developed in the filter subsequent to its initial testing. For this reason a filter's entire air flow permeation curve, particularly including its bubble point, must be characterized. It is this measurement, and this measurement alone, that is capable of unambiguously revealing the existence of insufficiently retentive pores. The inquiry into such presence is the very purpose of filter integrity testing.

单点扩散气流完整性测试的不足。
过滤器制造商通过单个可接受的最大扩散空气流量水平来表征给定过滤器类型。过高的值被谨慎地拒绝,因为这表明可能存在缺陷。低于规定最大值的值是可以接受的。然而,单孔的存在,无论它们的大小,都没有被揭示出来。只有它们对总孔隙度的影响是通过扩散气流来测量的。单点扩散气流完整性测试可能会导致误导性的结论,因为它提供了低气流掩盖缺陷或超大孔隙存在的可能性。在比较初始(预过滤)和最终完整性时尤其如此。残留物质的滤过性增加,无论是否可行,都不可避免地会堵塞或缩小孔隙的大小。这导致总孔隙度降低,直接表现为较低的扩散气流值。这种最终空气流量值的充分下降可以掩盖过滤器在初始测试后出现的缺陷。因此,必须对过滤器的整个气流渗透曲线,特别是包括其气泡点进行表征。正是这一测量,而且只有这一测量,才能够明确地揭示不充分保留孔隙的存在。调查这种存在是过滤器完整性测试的真正目的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信