Comparative Analysis of the Kruskal and Boruvka Algorithms in Solving Minimum Spanning Tree on Complete Graph

D. Rachmawati, Herriyance, Frederik Yan Putra Pakpahan
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of the Kruskal and Boruvka Algorithms in Solving Minimum Spanning Tree on Complete Graph","authors":"D. Rachmawati, Herriyance, Frederik Yan Putra Pakpahan","doi":"10.1109/DATABIA50434.2020.9190504","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The problem that is often encountered in daily life is connecting all points in one work domain with a low optimization value, for example, the most economical cost required to connect a water pipe to each house in an area. To solve this problem, a system that can find a path that connects all points in one work domain with the lowest optimization is needed. In this study, the system was built using two algorithms, namely, Kruskal and Boruvka algorithms, and a complete graph is used as a modeling of the problem. Using these two algorithms, the system will find the optimum path that connects all points in the complete graph; then, the system also displays a comparison between the two algorithms in finding the optimum route. The data used is dynamic, meaning the users can enter and change the value of the side of the complete graph as needed. From the tests that have been done, it is found that the Kruskal algorithm is more effective than the Boruvka to find the minimum spanning tree in a complete graph with some nodes, and sides are 15 points and 105 sides.","PeriodicalId":165106,"journal":{"name":"2020 International Conference on Data Science, Artificial Intelligence, and Business Analytics (DATABIA)","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 International Conference on Data Science, Artificial Intelligence, and Business Analytics (DATABIA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/DATABIA50434.2020.9190504","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The problem that is often encountered in daily life is connecting all points in one work domain with a low optimization value, for example, the most economical cost required to connect a water pipe to each house in an area. To solve this problem, a system that can find a path that connects all points in one work domain with the lowest optimization is needed. In this study, the system was built using two algorithms, namely, Kruskal and Boruvka algorithms, and a complete graph is used as a modeling of the problem. Using these two algorithms, the system will find the optimum path that connects all points in the complete graph; then, the system also displays a comparison between the two algorithms in finding the optimum route. The data used is dynamic, meaning the users can enter and change the value of the side of the complete graph as needed. From the tests that have been done, it is found that the Kruskal algorithm is more effective than the Boruvka to find the minimum spanning tree in a complete graph with some nodes, and sides are 15 points and 105 sides.
求解完全图上最小生成树的Kruskal和Boruvka算法的比较分析
在日常生活中经常遇到的问题是连接一个工作域中所有点的优化值较低,例如连接一个区域内每个房屋的水管所需的最经济成本。为了解决这一问题,需要一个能够以最低优化度找到连接一个工作域中所有点的路径的系统。本研究采用Kruskal算法和Boruvka算法两种算法构建系统,并采用完全图对问题进行建模。使用这两种算法,系统将找到连接完整图中所有点的最优路径;然后,对两种算法在寻找最优路径方面进行了比较。所使用的数据是动态的,这意味着用户可以根据需要输入和更改完整图形的边值。从已经完成的测试中发现,对于有一些节点,边数为15点和105条边的完全图,Kruskal算法比Boruvka算法更有效地找到最小生成树。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信