The future of wilderness in the Anthropocene and beyond

B. Mackey
{"title":"The future of wilderness in the Anthropocene and beyond","authors":"B. Mackey","doi":"10.4324/9780429299025-17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The concept of wilderness areas emerged during the latter half of the twentieth century as the global scope of the post-World War II ‘great acceleration’ ecological footprint become apparent. From a scientific perspective, wilderness is usefully conceived as a landscape-scale quality that can be measured on a gradient representing the increasing impacts and presence of modern land use activities and associated infrastructure. This scientific framing removes the folly of ignoring Indigenous peoples within the wilderness quality continuum, providing an important counter narrative to wilderness definitions based on false concepts such as terra nullius or to imposing wilderness areas without recognising their rights. The human footprint is increasing at the expense of natural systems and wilderness quality is degrading, resulting in biological annihilation from habitat loss and degradation and pollution, among other things. Human-forced rapid climate change now brings additional stresses for species and ecosystems. Insights into the future of wilderness areas and wild nature can be gained through the lens of evolution which focuses our attention on the ways in which how we are disrupting and polluting our environment – including through climate change – impact on species and ecosystems and the likely consequences. Human culture and technology are now detached from the DNA-based coevolution that gave rise to the Tree of Life and our species. The rise of networks of intelligent autonomous machines suggests the Anthropocene may be transiting into the Machinacene where environmental conditions become even more biologically harmful. The dominant global culture that drives the Anthropocene, and is enabling the possibility of the Machinacene, needs to become guided by an ethic that respects life and the diversity of the Tree of Life, irrespective of its value to people, and the quality of life lived. New mechanisms and institutions are also needed that enable more ethically-based decision making at a planetary level. We have only a narrow window of time left to transit to a more sustainable and biologically rich era based on the use of clean energy sources, closing production cycles, growing our food organically, ending deforestation and degradation, and making sufficient room for species and ecosystems in a co-evolving world.","PeriodicalId":233045,"journal":{"name":"Rethinking Wilderness and the Wild","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rethinking Wilderness and the Wild","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429299025-17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The concept of wilderness areas emerged during the latter half of the twentieth century as the global scope of the post-World War II ‘great acceleration’ ecological footprint become apparent. From a scientific perspective, wilderness is usefully conceived as a landscape-scale quality that can be measured on a gradient representing the increasing impacts and presence of modern land use activities and associated infrastructure. This scientific framing removes the folly of ignoring Indigenous peoples within the wilderness quality continuum, providing an important counter narrative to wilderness definitions based on false concepts such as terra nullius or to imposing wilderness areas without recognising their rights. The human footprint is increasing at the expense of natural systems and wilderness quality is degrading, resulting in biological annihilation from habitat loss and degradation and pollution, among other things. Human-forced rapid climate change now brings additional stresses for species and ecosystems. Insights into the future of wilderness areas and wild nature can be gained through the lens of evolution which focuses our attention on the ways in which how we are disrupting and polluting our environment – including through climate change – impact on species and ecosystems and the likely consequences. Human culture and technology are now detached from the DNA-based coevolution that gave rise to the Tree of Life and our species. The rise of networks of intelligent autonomous machines suggests the Anthropocene may be transiting into the Machinacene where environmental conditions become even more biologically harmful. The dominant global culture that drives the Anthropocene, and is enabling the possibility of the Machinacene, needs to become guided by an ethic that respects life and the diversity of the Tree of Life, irrespective of its value to people, and the quality of life lived. New mechanisms and institutions are also needed that enable more ethically-based decision making at a planetary level. We have only a narrow window of time left to transit to a more sustainable and biologically rich era based on the use of clean energy sources, closing production cycles, growing our food organically, ending deforestation and degradation, and making sufficient room for species and ecosystems in a co-evolving world.
人类世及以后荒野的未来
随着第二次世界大战后全球生态足迹的“大加速”,荒野地区的概念在20世纪下半叶出现。从科学的角度来看,荒野被认为是一种景观尺度的质量,可以用代表现代土地利用活动和相关基础设施日益增加的影响和存在的梯度来衡量。这种科学框架消除了在荒野质量连续体中忽视土著人民的愚蠢行为,为基于诸如无主地等错误概念的荒野定义或在不承认其权利的情况下强加荒野地区提供了重要的反叙述。人类足迹的增加是以牺牲自然系统为代价的,荒野的质量正在退化,导致生境丧失、退化和污染等造成生物灭绝。人为造成的快速气候变化现在给物种和生态系统带来了额外的压力。通过进化的镜头,我们可以洞察荒野地区和野生自然的未来,它将我们的注意力集中在我们如何破坏和污染环境的方式上——包括通过气候变化——对物种和生态系统的影响以及可能的后果。人类文化和技术现在已经脱离了以dna为基础的共同进化,这种共同进化产生了生命之树和我们这个物种。智能自主机器网络的兴起表明,人类世(Anthropocene)可能正在过渡到机器世(Machinacene),在那里,环境条件对生物的危害甚至更大。推动人类世并使机器世成为可能的主导全球文化,需要以一种尊重生命和生命之树多样性的伦理为指导,而不管其对人类的价值和生活质量如何。还需要新的机制和机构,使在全球一级的决策更加以道德为基础。我们只剩下很短的时间窗口来过渡到一个更可持续和生物丰富的时代,这个时代的基础是使用清洁能源,关闭生产周期,有机种植粮食,结束森林砍伐和退化,并在共同进化的世界中为物种和生态系统提供足够的空间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信