Engineering Critical Assessment of Triple-Point Flaws in Mechanically Lined Pipes

A. Pépin, T. Tkaczyk, Riadh Abderrazak
{"title":"Engineering Critical Assessment of Triple-Point Flaws in Mechanically Lined Pipes","authors":"A. Pépin, T. Tkaczyk, Riadh Abderrazak","doi":"10.1115/omae2021-63450","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n There is increasing demand for subsea transport of well-produced fluids through corrosion resistant pipelines such as stainless steel or bimetallic pipes. The latter are made of carbon steel (CS) pipe and a thin (typically 3.0 mm thick) internal layer of corrosion resistant alloy (CRA) such as 316L, 625, 825 or 904L. The CRA and CS layers are adhered either metallurgically or mechanically by a means of an interference fit. Although less mature than other products, mechanically lined pipes (MLP) are more readily available and economical than both stainless steel or hot-roll bonded (HRB) metallurgically clad pipes. One of the gaps that remains to be filled relates to a reliable assessment method for confirming the MLP integrity during offshore installation and subsea service.\n The CRA liner in MLP is metallurgically bonded to CS at pipe ends by overlay welding, typically deposited using alloy 625 consumable. At the triple-point interface between the liner, overlay and host pipe, cracks may initiate from fabrication flaws and grow during installation or in service. Therefore, the engineering critical assessment (ECA) should be carried out to evaluate the risk of triple-point cracks breaching the CRA layer at any stage of the pipeline’s life cycle. Currently, no recognised ECA approach exists to allow completing such an assessment.\n Therefore, a bespoke integrity assessment procedure has been developed and validated both numerically and via laboratory testing. This paper outlines the ECA procedure for triple-point flaws in subsea MLP pipelines, which is undertaken through a combined analytical and numerical calculation and small-scale fracture testing. Fatigue crack growth due to cyclic loading is estimated using a geometry-specific stress intensity factor (SIF) solution derived by finite-element analysis (FEA). Ductile tearing during fracture load events is quantified by small-scale fracture testing on specimens with a representative geometry, designed to match the crack tip constraint of triple-point cracks in MLP.","PeriodicalId":240325,"journal":{"name":"Volume 4: Pipelines, Risers, and Subsea Systems","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 4: Pipelines, Risers, and Subsea Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/omae2021-63450","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

There is increasing demand for subsea transport of well-produced fluids through corrosion resistant pipelines such as stainless steel or bimetallic pipes. The latter are made of carbon steel (CS) pipe and a thin (typically 3.0 mm thick) internal layer of corrosion resistant alloy (CRA) such as 316L, 625, 825 or 904L. The CRA and CS layers are adhered either metallurgically or mechanically by a means of an interference fit. Although less mature than other products, mechanically lined pipes (MLP) are more readily available and economical than both stainless steel or hot-roll bonded (HRB) metallurgically clad pipes. One of the gaps that remains to be filled relates to a reliable assessment method for confirming the MLP integrity during offshore installation and subsea service. The CRA liner in MLP is metallurgically bonded to CS at pipe ends by overlay welding, typically deposited using alloy 625 consumable. At the triple-point interface between the liner, overlay and host pipe, cracks may initiate from fabrication flaws and grow during installation or in service. Therefore, the engineering critical assessment (ECA) should be carried out to evaluate the risk of triple-point cracks breaching the CRA layer at any stage of the pipeline’s life cycle. Currently, no recognised ECA approach exists to allow completing such an assessment. Therefore, a bespoke integrity assessment procedure has been developed and validated both numerically and via laboratory testing. This paper outlines the ECA procedure for triple-point flaws in subsea MLP pipelines, which is undertaken through a combined analytical and numerical calculation and small-scale fracture testing. Fatigue crack growth due to cyclic loading is estimated using a geometry-specific stress intensity factor (SIF) solution derived by finite-element analysis (FEA). Ductile tearing during fracture load events is quantified by small-scale fracture testing on specimens with a representative geometry, designed to match the crack tip constraint of triple-point cracks in MLP.
机械衬管三点缺陷的工程临界评价
通过耐腐蚀管道(如不锈钢或双金属管道)输送油井流体的需求日益增加。后者由碳钢(CS)管和薄(通常为3.0毫米厚)的耐腐蚀合金(CRA)内层制成,如316L, 625, 825或904L。CRA和CS层通过过干涉配合的方法进行冶金或机械粘合。虽然不如其他产品成熟,但机械内衬管(MLP)比不锈钢或热轧粘合(HRB)冶金包覆管更容易获得,也更经济。在海上安装和海底服务期间,确定MLP完整性的可靠评估方法是一个有待填补的空白。MLP中的CRA衬管通过堆焊与管端的CS进行冶金粘合,通常使用625合金消耗品沉积。在尾管、覆盖层和主管之间的三点界面处,裂缝可能由制造缺陷引起,并在安装或使用过程中不断扩大。因此,在管道生命周期的任何阶段,都应进行工程临界评价(ECA),以评估三点裂缝破坏CRA层的风险。目前,没有公认的非洲经委会方法允许完成这样的评估。因此,定制的完整性评估程序已经开发出来,并通过数值和实验室测试进行了验证。本文概述了海底MLP管道三点缺陷的ECA程序,该程序通过分析和数值计算相结合以及小规模破裂试验进行。利用有限元分析(FEA)导出的几何特定应力强度因子(SIF)解估计循环加载引起的疲劳裂纹扩展。通过具有代表性几何形状的试样的小规模断裂试验,量化了断裂载荷事件中的韧性撕裂,旨在匹配MLP中三点裂纹的裂纹尖端约束。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信