Voicing participation in large-scale infrastructural projects: A contextualization of participatory communication in Lamu Port, Kenya

M. M. Kamau, Alex Kubasu Khsiebi
{"title":"Voicing participation in large-scale infrastructural projects: A contextualization of participatory communication in Lamu Port, Kenya","authors":"M. M. Kamau, Alex Kubasu Khsiebi","doi":"10.5897/jmcs2022.0765","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study argues that, although public participation is a mechanism of connection and collective struggle, its practice lacks strong operational foundation. A re-conceptualization of participation as a planning and social reform tool is expounded through examination of how project affected people in the Kenya Lamu Port project, voiced their participation concerns. Lamu Port is a key infrastructural project in the Lamu Port - South Sudan - Ethiopia Transport Corridor Project (LAPSSET). LAPSSET is one of the biggest and costliest projects in Africa. It suffered major completion delay and by November of 2021, only three of the 32 berths were functional. Four objectives were pursued: describe how the local people understand participatory communication, determine what people ‘voice’ their participatory concerns, expound how the local people voice their participation concerns and explain the challenges of participation. A mixed method approach was used where key informants and a sample of 385 residents were studied. Data were analyzed using descriptive techniques and thematic analyses. Key findings were that, it is not the quantity of participation that matters in safeguarding community and individual interests, but the quality and voicing strategies that are adopted by the participants. Similarly, not all communication and participation agenda by projects implementers are perceived as genuine and reflective of community’s’ interest. It is recommended that, people who fight for community rights should be recognized and empowered via mechanism such as legislations and regulations. Participation gives a community surveillance power on matters that affect it and is an encounter process.","PeriodicalId":126106,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Media and Communication Studies","volume":"100 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Media and Communication Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5897/jmcs2022.0765","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This study argues that, although public participation is a mechanism of connection and collective struggle, its practice lacks strong operational foundation. A re-conceptualization of participation as a planning and social reform tool is expounded through examination of how project affected people in the Kenya Lamu Port project, voiced their participation concerns. Lamu Port is a key infrastructural project in the Lamu Port - South Sudan - Ethiopia Transport Corridor Project (LAPSSET). LAPSSET is one of the biggest and costliest projects in Africa. It suffered major completion delay and by November of 2021, only three of the 32 berths were functional. Four objectives were pursued: describe how the local people understand participatory communication, determine what people ‘voice’ their participatory concerns, expound how the local people voice their participation concerns and explain the challenges of participation. A mixed method approach was used where key informants and a sample of 385 residents were studied. Data were analyzed using descriptive techniques and thematic analyses. Key findings were that, it is not the quantity of participation that matters in safeguarding community and individual interests, but the quality and voicing strategies that are adopted by the participants. Similarly, not all communication and participation agenda by projects implementers are perceived as genuine and reflective of community’s’ interest. It is recommended that, people who fight for community rights should be recognized and empowered via mechanism such as legislations and regulations. Participation gives a community surveillance power on matters that affect it and is an encounter process.
在大型基础设施项目中表达参与权:肯尼亚拉穆港参与性沟通的语境化
本研究认为,虽然公众参与是一种联结和集体斗争的机制,但其实践缺乏强大的操作基础。通过考察项目如何影响肯尼亚拉穆港项目中的人们表达他们的参与关切,本文阐述了参与作为一种规划和社会改革工具的重新概念。拉穆港是拉穆港-南苏丹-埃塞俄比亚运输走廊项目(LAPSSET)的重点基础设施项目。LAPSSET是非洲最大、最昂贵的项目之一。到2021年11月,32个泊位中只有3个可用。研究追求四个目标:描述当地人如何理解参与性沟通,确定人们“表达”他们的参与性关注,阐述当地人如何表达他们的参与性关注,并解释参与的挑战。采用混合方法对主要举报人和385名居民样本进行了研究。数据分析采用描述性技术和专题分析。主要发现是,在维护社区和个人利益方面,重要的不是参与的数量,而是参与者所采取的质量和发声策略。同样,并非所有项目执行者的沟通和参与议程都被认为是真实的,反映了社区的利益。建议通过立法和法规等机制,承认和授权为社区权利而斗争的人。参与赋予社区对影响它的事务的监督权力,这是一个接触过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信