Exploring COVID-19 public perceptions in South Africa through sentiment analysis and topic modelling of Twitter posts

Temitope Kekere, V. Marivate, M. Hattingh
{"title":"Exploring COVID-19 public perceptions in South Africa through sentiment analysis and topic modelling of Twitter posts","authors":"Temitope Kekere, V. Marivate, M. Hattingh","doi":"10.23962/ajic.i31.14834","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The narratives shared on social media during a health crisis such as COVID-19 reflect public perceptions of the crisis. This article provides findings from a study of the perceptions of South African citizens regarding the government’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic from March to May 2020. The study analysed Twitter data from posts by government officials and the public in South Africa to measure the public’s confidence in how the government was handling the pandemic. Results produced by four popular machine-learning classifiers for sentiment analysis— logistic regression (LR), support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost)—demonstrated these classifiers’ levels of effectiveness. In addition, the study used, and evaluated the effectiveness of, two topic-modelling algorithms—latent dirichlet allocation (LDA) and non-negative matrix factorisation (NMF)—in the classification of social media discourses in terms of frequently occurring topics. In terms of South African public sentiment towards COVID-19 and the government’s response, it was found that, based on the Twitter data, South Africans held predominantly negative views.","PeriodicalId":409918,"journal":{"name":"The African Journal of Information and Communication (AJIC)","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The African Journal of Information and Communication (AJIC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23962/ajic.i31.14834","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The narratives shared on social media during a health crisis such as COVID-19 reflect public perceptions of the crisis. This article provides findings from a study of the perceptions of South African citizens regarding the government’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic from March to May 2020. The study analysed Twitter data from posts by government officials and the public in South Africa to measure the public’s confidence in how the government was handling the pandemic. Results produced by four popular machine-learning classifiers for sentiment analysis— logistic regression (LR), support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost)—demonstrated these classifiers’ levels of effectiveness. In addition, the study used, and evaluated the effectiveness of, two topic-modelling algorithms—latent dirichlet allocation (LDA) and non-negative matrix factorisation (NMF)—in the classification of social media discourses in terms of frequently occurring topics. In terms of South African public sentiment towards COVID-19 and the government’s response, it was found that, based on the Twitter data, South Africans held predominantly negative views.
通过对推特帖子的情绪分析和主题建模,探索南非公众对COVID-19的看法
在COVID-19等健康危机期间,社交媒体上分享的叙述反映了公众对这场危机的看法。本文提供了一项研究的结果,该研究调查了2020年3月至5月南非公民对政府应对COVID-19大流行的看法。该研究分析了南非政府官员和公众发布的推特数据,以衡量公众对政府如何应对疫情的信心。四种流行的情感分析机器学习分类器——逻辑回归(LR)、支持向量机(SVM)、随机森林(RF)和极端梯度增强(XGBoost)——产生的结果证明了这些分类器的有效性。此外,该研究使用并评估了两种主题建模算法——潜狄利克雷分配(LDA)和非负矩阵分解(NMF)——根据频繁出现的主题对社交媒体话语进行分类的有效性。就南非公众对COVID-19的情绪和政府的反应而言,根据推特数据,南非人主要持负面看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信