Reconstruction of the Completion of Presidential Election Dispute by Progressive Law Approach

Abstract

- The implementation of elections must refer to the principles of honesty and justice. The occurrence of violations in a systematic and massive structure has given a dominant position. This dominant position is the main cause that influences vote acquisition. Thus, determining the existence of electoral fraud must be seen from the existence of structured and systematic actions in the form of a dominant position that results in massive vote acquisition. The dominant position is very decisive in terms of proving electoral fraud qualitatively. The massive vote acquisition is resultant. Referring to the progressive law paradigm, related to the violation of the Presidential Election which is in TSM, the approach is to ensure the existence of a causality relationship between the dominant position and illegal vote acquisition. So it is a qualitative approach. As long as it can be proven that there is a correspondence between systematically structured actions that given a dominant position, then the results of massive fraud by itself can be easily proven.