Contributions of Linguistics to the Study of Aphasias: Focus on Discursive Approaches

Rosana do Carmo Novaes-Pinto, Arnaldo Rodrigues de Lima
{"title":"Contributions of Linguistics to the Study of Aphasias: Focus on Discursive Approaches","authors":"Rosana do Carmo Novaes-Pinto, Arnaldo Rodrigues de Lima","doi":"10.5772/intechopen.101058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The chapter aims to present and discuss the contributions of Linguistics to the study of aphasias, especially regarding the power of discursive theories to subsidize language assessment and therapeutic follow-up with aphasic individuals. Jakobson, in 1956, based on Saussure’s approach and on Luria’s neuropsychological theory, was the first scholar to call for the participation of linguists in this field, once “aphasia is a problem of language”. Nonetheless, aphasia does not disturb only linguistic formal levels – phonetical-phonological, syntactic, lexical-semantic –, but also pragmatic and discursive aspects of language that are constitutive of meaning processes involved in the social use of language. Unfortunately, more traditional approaches to language assessment and to the follow-up work are exclusively based on metalinguistic tasks, which do not take into consideration the subjective and contextual aspects of language functioning. The experience we have acquired over more than thirty years within the field of Neurolinguistics has shown that qualitative longitudinal researches – mainly case studies – are a privileged locus to seek for evidences of how the linguistic levels are impacted in the several forms of aphasia. Such understanding, in turn, favor the therapeutic work towards more contextualized activities, in order to help the individuals to reorganize their linguistic-cognitive processes.","PeriodicalId":329317,"journal":{"name":"Aphasia Compendium [Working Title]","volume":"75 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aphasia Compendium [Working Title]","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.101058","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The chapter aims to present and discuss the contributions of Linguistics to the study of aphasias, especially regarding the power of discursive theories to subsidize language assessment and therapeutic follow-up with aphasic individuals. Jakobson, in 1956, based on Saussure’s approach and on Luria’s neuropsychological theory, was the first scholar to call for the participation of linguists in this field, once “aphasia is a problem of language”. Nonetheless, aphasia does not disturb only linguistic formal levels – phonetical-phonological, syntactic, lexical-semantic –, but also pragmatic and discursive aspects of language that are constitutive of meaning processes involved in the social use of language. Unfortunately, more traditional approaches to language assessment and to the follow-up work are exclusively based on metalinguistic tasks, which do not take into consideration the subjective and contextual aspects of language functioning. The experience we have acquired over more than thirty years within the field of Neurolinguistics has shown that qualitative longitudinal researches – mainly case studies – are a privileged locus to seek for evidences of how the linguistic levels are impacted in the several forms of aphasia. Such understanding, in turn, favor the therapeutic work towards more contextualized activities, in order to help the individuals to reorganize their linguistic-cognitive processes.
语言学对失语症研究的贡献:以话语方法为中心
本章旨在介绍和讨论语言学对失语症研究的贡献,特别是关于话语理论在资助失语症患者的语言评估和治疗随访方面的作用。1956年,雅各布森以索绪尔的方法和卢里亚的神经心理学理论为基础,第一个呼吁语言学家参与这一领域,一度认为“失语症是语言的问题”。尽管如此,失语症不仅影响语言的形式层面——语音-语音、句法、词汇-语义——而且还影响语言的语用和话语方面,这些方面构成了语言的社会使用所涉及的意义过程。不幸的是,更传统的语言评估方法和后续工作完全基于元语言任务,而不考虑语言功能的主观和语境方面。我们在神经语言学领域三十多年来的经验表明,定性的纵向研究——主要是案例研究——是寻找几种失语症中语言水平如何受到影响的证据的有利场所。这样的理解,反过来,有利于治疗工作朝着更情境化的活动,以帮助个人重新组织他们的语言认知过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信