UMROH AS THE REASON FOR UNILATERAL TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT BY PT. DARUSSALAM BERLIAN MOTOR FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF IJĀRAH BI AL-‘AMAL (Verdict Case Study No. 1/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2019/PN Bna)

S. Azizah, Husni Mubarrak, M. Muslem
{"title":"UMROH AS THE REASON FOR UNILATERAL TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT BY PT. DARUSSALAM BERLIAN MOTOR FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF IJĀRAH BI AL-‘AMAL (Verdict Case Study No. 1/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2019/PN Bna)","authors":"S. Azizah, Husni Mubarrak, M. Muslem","doi":"10.22373/DUSTURIYAH.V11I1.8430","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PT. Darussalam Berlian Motor has terminated one of its employees on the grounds of performing the umroh. However the company/defendant argued that the employee/litigant had left their job without even notifying the defendant in advance. The defendat also explained that during their tenure, the litigant often made serious mistakes. On contrary, due to the serious mistakes that had been committed before, the defendant did not terminate the employment contract and the action was only taken when the litigant performed umroh in the holy land. The question in this research is how the judge considers the unilateral termination of employment experienced by the employee and what are the factors that cause the judge to grant the litigant’s claim. And how is the perspective of Ijārah bi al-‘Amal contract against the judge’s decision regardimg the grant of the litigant’s claim. In this research the authors used normative legal research method that analyzed the judge’s decree No. 1/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2019/PN Bna with qualitative approach. The judge in his decree considered thet the termination of employment on the grounds that the litigant had committed serious problems could not be considered because it was not in accordance with the applicable law. As for the factors that caused the judge to grant the litigant’s claim, due to the absence of evidence of a second PKWT contract between the litigant and the defendant, that’s why the previously PKWT contract changed to PKWTT contract. In Islamic law, when ones terminating a work relationship a company can perform fasakh through urbun which has similarities with the obligation to pay severance pay. From the explanation above, it can be concluded that unilateral termination of employment cannot be justified and does not have a string legal force.","PeriodicalId":415658,"journal":{"name":"Dusturiyah: Jurnal Hukum Islam, Perundang-undangan dan Pranata Sosial","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dusturiyah: Jurnal Hukum Islam, Perundang-undangan dan Pranata Sosial","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22373/DUSTURIYAH.V11I1.8430","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PT. Darussalam Berlian Motor has terminated one of its employees on the grounds of performing the umroh. However the company/defendant argued that the employee/litigant had left their job without even notifying the defendant in advance. The defendat also explained that during their tenure, the litigant often made serious mistakes. On contrary, due to the serious mistakes that had been committed before, the defendant did not terminate the employment contract and the action was only taken when the litigant performed umroh in the holy land. The question in this research is how the judge considers the unilateral termination of employment experienced by the employee and what are the factors that cause the judge to grant the litigant’s claim. And how is the perspective of Ijārah bi al-‘Amal contract against the judge’s decision regardimg the grant of the litigant’s claim. In this research the authors used normative legal research method that analyzed the judge’s decree No. 1/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2019/PN Bna with qualitative approach. The judge in his decree considered thet the termination of employment on the grounds that the litigant had committed serious problems could not be considered because it was not in accordance with the applicable law. As for the factors that caused the judge to grant the litigant’s claim, due to the absence of evidence of a second PKWT contract between the litigant and the defendant, that’s why the previously PKWT contract changed to PKWTT contract. In Islamic law, when ones terminating a work relationship a company can perform fasakh through urbun which has similarities with the obligation to pay severance pay. From the explanation above, it can be concluded that unilateral termination of employment cannot be justified and does not have a string legal force.
从IJĀRAH BI AL- AMAL(判决案例研究No. 1/Pdt)的视角看UMROH作为达鲁萨兰州柏林汽车公司单方面终止雇佣的原因。Sus-PHI / 2019 / PN Bna)
达鲁萨兰邦柏林汽车公司解雇了一名员工,理由是他违反了宪法。然而,公司/被告辩称,该雇员/诉讼人在没有事先通知被告的情况下离职。被告还解释说,在他们任职期间,当事人经常犯严重错误。相反,由于之前犯了严重的错误,被告没有解除雇佣合同,只是在当事人在圣地履行umroh时才提起诉讼。本研究的问题是法官如何考虑雇员所经历的单方面终止雇佣关系,以及导致法官批准诉讼当事人索赔的因素是什么。以及Ijārah bi - al- Amal合同的观点如何反对法官关于授予当事人索赔的决定。在本研究中,作者采用规范的法学研究方法,对第1/Pdt号法官令进行了分析。su - phi /2019/PN Bna与定性方法。法官在其法令中认为,不能考虑以诉讼当事人犯了严重问题为理由而终止雇用,因为这不符合适用的法律。至于导致法官批准当事人请求的因素,由于没有证据表明当事人与被告之间存在第二份PKWT合同,这就是为什么之前的PKWT合同变更为PKWTT合同。在伊斯兰法律中,当一个人终止工作关系时,公司可以通过支付遣散费的义务来履行合同。从上面的解释可以得出结论,单方面终止雇佣关系是不合理的,不具有一连串的法律效力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信