Love in Dionysius the Areopagite and St Maximus the Confessor

A. Louth
{"title":"Love in Dionysius the Areopagite and St Maximus the Confessor","authors":"A. Louth","doi":"10.23865/noasp.133.ch07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Love (erōs, agapē) is a fundamental category in the sixth-century Dionysius the Areopagite and the seventh-century Maximus the Confessor, the latter being confessedly dependant on the former, and both formative for the later Byzantine tradition. Both are indebted to earlier thinkers, both pagan thinkers such as Plato, Plotinus, and Proclus, and Christian thinkers such as Origen and the Cappadocian Fathers. Dionysius’s teaching on love presents a fundamentally metaphysical account, with cosmic entailments. He assimilates the two Greek words for love, erōs and agapē, seeing them both as manifestations of beauty and responses to beauty, and using them more or less interchangeably for the ecstatic love of God for the cosmos and the love that underlies the creatures’ return to union, to the One. Maximus shares Dionysius’s sense of love as metaphysical and cosmic, but his teaching is much more practical, and presents love as something that can be attained by the Christian or monk, though it requires genuine ascetic struggle. He makes more of a distinction between erōs and agapē than Dionysius, seeing erōs as perfecting the soul’s desire, while agapē perfects the soul’s thumos, psychic energy. Maximus’s understanding of the interrelated psychological makeup of the soul, influenced by Evagrius, though with its own characteristic emphases, also underlies his sense of what is meant by the restoration of the cosmos.","PeriodicalId":425519,"journal":{"name":"Love – Ancient Perspectives","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Love – Ancient Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23865/noasp.133.ch07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Love (erōs, agapē) is a fundamental category in the sixth-century Dionysius the Areopagite and the seventh-century Maximus the Confessor, the latter being confessedly dependant on the former, and both formative for the later Byzantine tradition. Both are indebted to earlier thinkers, both pagan thinkers such as Plato, Plotinus, and Proclus, and Christian thinkers such as Origen and the Cappadocian Fathers. Dionysius’s teaching on love presents a fundamentally metaphysical account, with cosmic entailments. He assimilates the two Greek words for love, erōs and agapē, seeing them both as manifestations of beauty and responses to beauty, and using them more or less interchangeably for the ecstatic love of God for the cosmos and the love that underlies the creatures’ return to union, to the One. Maximus shares Dionysius’s sense of love as metaphysical and cosmic, but his teaching is much more practical, and presents love as something that can be attained by the Christian or monk, though it requires genuine ascetic struggle. He makes more of a distinction between erōs and agapē than Dionysius, seeing erōs as perfecting the soul’s desire, while agapē perfects the soul’s thumos, psychic energy. Maximus’s understanding of the interrelated psychological makeup of the soul, influenced by Evagrius, though with its own characteristic emphases, also underlies his sense of what is meant by the restoration of the cosmos.
狄奥尼修斯和忏悔者圣马克西姆斯的爱情
爱(erōs, agapæ)是六世纪的狄奥尼修斯和七世纪的忏悔者马克西姆斯的一个基本范畴,后者显然依赖于前者,两者都形成了后来的拜占庭传统。两者都要感谢早期的思想家,包括异教思想家柏拉图、普罗提诺和普罗克劳斯,以及基督教思想家奥利金和卡帕多西亚教父们。狄奥尼修斯关于爱的教导从根本上讲是一种形而上学的解释,带有宇宙的内涵。他吸收了希腊语中表示爱的两个词,erōs和agapæ,把它们都看作美和对美的回应的表现,并或多或少地交替使用它们来表达上帝对宇宙的狂喜之爱,以及万物回归合一的爱。马克西姆斯和狄奥尼修斯一样,对爱的理解是形而上的和宇宙的,但他的教导更实际,他把爱描述为基督徒或僧侣可以获得的东西,尽管它需要真正的苦行斗争。他比狄奥尼修斯更能区分erōs和阿加普æ,认为erōs是灵魂欲望的完善化,而阿加普æ则是灵魂心灵能量的完善化。马克西姆斯对灵魂的相互关联的心理构成的理解,受到伊夫格里乌斯的影响,尽管有自己独特的重点,但也构成了他对宇宙恢复的意义的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信