Using expert systems technology to increase agriculture production and water conservation

M. Mahmoud, M. Rafea, A. Rafea
{"title":"Using expert systems technology to increase agriculture production and water conservation","authors":"M. Mahmoud, M. Rafea, A. Rafea","doi":"10.1109/ICDIM.2008.4746802","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although there are many developed expert systems in the world, little consideration has been given to the impacts resulting from their use. There is a difference between the developed expert systems in the laboratories for research and demonstration and the expert systems that can be applied in the fields. The applied expert systems must cover the end users requirements and meet some other evaluation criteria. ESs are evaluated both in the laboratory and in the fields. In the laboratory evaluation, there is an evaluation methodology to guarantee that the ES can be used in the field. The field evaluation is achieved by applying field experiments. Those field experiments showed that fields managed by the ES are better than the control fields. In this paper, the evaluation criteria that guarantee the success of ESs deployed in the fields are presented. These evaluation criteria have been applied on three ES applications, namely: CITEX for citrus cultivation, CUPTEX for cucumber cultivation under plastic tunnel, and NEPER for wheat cultivation. Expert systems potentially have several different types or categories of impact relative to the applied domain. The field experiments are used to evaluate the economical and environmental impacts of the ES. The economical impact includes the cost, profit, and yield. The environmental impact includes the effect of using the ES on water and soil conservation, and also on decreasing the amount of pesticides used in the fields.","PeriodicalId":415013,"journal":{"name":"2008 Third International Conference on Digital Information Management","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2008 Third International Conference on Digital Information Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDIM.2008.4746802","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Although there are many developed expert systems in the world, little consideration has been given to the impacts resulting from their use. There is a difference between the developed expert systems in the laboratories for research and demonstration and the expert systems that can be applied in the fields. The applied expert systems must cover the end users requirements and meet some other evaluation criteria. ESs are evaluated both in the laboratory and in the fields. In the laboratory evaluation, there is an evaluation methodology to guarantee that the ES can be used in the field. The field evaluation is achieved by applying field experiments. Those field experiments showed that fields managed by the ES are better than the control fields. In this paper, the evaluation criteria that guarantee the success of ESs deployed in the fields are presented. These evaluation criteria have been applied on three ES applications, namely: CITEX for citrus cultivation, CUPTEX for cucumber cultivation under plastic tunnel, and NEPER for wheat cultivation. Expert systems potentially have several different types or categories of impact relative to the applied domain. The field experiments are used to evaluate the economical and environmental impacts of the ES. The economical impact includes the cost, profit, and yield. The environmental impact includes the effect of using the ES on water and soil conservation, and also on decreasing the amount of pesticides used in the fields.
利用专家系统技术提高农业产量和节约用水
虽然世界上有许多发达的专家系统,但很少考虑到它们的使用所产生的影响。在实验室开发的用于研究和示范的专家系统与可应用于现场的专家系统之间存在差异。应用的专家系统必须涵盖最终用户的需求,并满足其他一些评估标准。在实验室和实地都对ESs进行了评估。在实验室评估中,有一个评估方法来保证ES可以在现场使用。通过现场试验进行了现场评价。田间试验结果表明,ES管理的田间效果优于对照田。在此基础上,提出了保证ESs在野外部署成功的评价标准。这些评价标准分别应用于柑橘栽培CITEX、塑料隧道下黄瓜栽培CUPTEX和小麦栽培NEPER 3个ES应用。相对于应用领域,专家系统可能有几种不同类型或类别的影响。通过田间试验,对ES的经济和环境影响进行了评价。经济影响包括成本、利润和产量。环境影响包括使用ES对水土保持的影响,以及对减少田间农药使用量的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信