Interlinkages and Diversification Opportunities Among Emerging Bond Markets: BRIC and BRICS Comparison

Adefemi A. Obalade, Tsepang Moeti, Vijen Moodley, Yusuf Randeree, P. Muzindutsi
{"title":"Interlinkages and Diversification Opportunities Among Emerging Bond Markets: BRIC and BRICS Comparison","authors":"Adefemi A. Obalade, Tsepang Moeti, Vijen Moodley, Yusuf Randeree, P. Muzindutsi","doi":"10.1108/s1571-03862021000029a023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study evaluated the interlinkages and diversification opportunities in the context of emerging bond markets from 2007:1 to 2020:5, using the vector autoregressive (VAR) model and sub‐period analyses to compare BRIC (2007:1–2010:11) and BRICS (2010:12–2020:5) regimes. As indicated by the breaking unit‐root test, dummies for the global financial crisis and COVID‐19 were incorporated in the analyses. VAR results showed that the Indian bond market responds positively to the previous change in the Chinese bond market during the BRIC era while BRICS bond markets are mostly uninfluenced by prior behavior patterns of one another. These suggested that the diversification opportunity has been increased following the admission of South Africa to the league. In addition, variance decomposition and impulse response provide proofs to suggest that BRICS bond markets are more exogenous and independent compared to what is obtained during the BRIC period. Consequently, the authors concluded that the BRICS bloc has provided greater diversification opportunities for emerging markets’ bondholders in the recent past. © 2022 by Emerald Publishing Limited.","PeriodicalId":239396,"journal":{"name":"Environmental, Social, and Governance Perspectives on Economic Development in Asia","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental, Social, and Governance Perspectives on Economic Development in Asia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/s1571-03862021000029a023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study evaluated the interlinkages and diversification opportunities in the context of emerging bond markets from 2007:1 to 2020:5, using the vector autoregressive (VAR) model and sub‐period analyses to compare BRIC (2007:1–2010:11) and BRICS (2010:12–2020:5) regimes. As indicated by the breaking unit‐root test, dummies for the global financial crisis and COVID‐19 were incorporated in the analyses. VAR results showed that the Indian bond market responds positively to the previous change in the Chinese bond market during the BRIC era while BRICS bond markets are mostly uninfluenced by prior behavior patterns of one another. These suggested that the diversification opportunity has been increased following the admission of South Africa to the league. In addition, variance decomposition and impulse response provide proofs to suggest that BRICS bond markets are more exogenous and independent compared to what is obtained during the BRIC period. Consequently, the authors concluded that the BRICS bloc has provided greater diversification opportunities for emerging markets’ bondholders in the recent past. © 2022 by Emerald Publishing Limited.
新兴债券市场的相互联系与多元化机遇:金砖四国及其比较
该研究评估了2007:1至2020:5期间新兴债券市场背景下的相互联系和多样化机会,使用向量自回归(VAR)模型和分时期分析来比较金砖四国(2007:1 - 2010:11)和金砖国家(2010:12-2020:5)制度。正如打破单位根检验所表明的那样,全球金融危机和COVID - 19的假人被纳入分析。VAR结果显示,在金砖国家时期,印度债券市场对中国债券市场先前的变化有积极的反应,而金砖国家债券市场大多不受彼此先前行为模式的影响。这表明,在南非加入联盟之后,多样化的机会增加了。此外,方差分解和脉冲响应证明,与金砖四国时期相比,金砖国家债券市场更具外生性和独立性。因此,作者得出结论,金砖国家集团最近为新兴市场债券持有人提供了更大的多元化机会。©2022 by Emerald Publishing Limited。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信