Refuting security proofs for tripartite key exchange with model checker in planning problem setting

Kim-Kwang Raymond Choo
{"title":"Refuting security proofs for tripartite key exchange with model checker in planning problem setting","authors":"Kim-Kwang Raymond Choo","doi":"10.1109/CSFW.2006.26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We encode a simplified version of the Canetti and Krawczyk (2001) formalism using asynchronous product automata (APA). We then use a model checker tool, simple homomorphism verification tool (SHVT), to perform state-space analysis on our automata in the setting of planning problem. As a case study, we revisit two tripartite key exchange protocols of Hitchcock, Boyd, and Gonzalez Nieto (2004), which carry claimed security proofs in the Canetti and Krawczyk (2001) model. We refute their proofs of security by pointing out previously unpublished flaws in the protocols using SHVT. We then point out corresponding flaws in the refuted proofs","PeriodicalId":131951,"journal":{"name":"19th IEEE Computer Security Foundations Workshop (CSFW'06)","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"19th IEEE Computer Security Foundations Workshop (CSFW'06)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CSFW.2006.26","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

Abstract

We encode a simplified version of the Canetti and Krawczyk (2001) formalism using asynchronous product automata (APA). We then use a model checker tool, simple homomorphism verification tool (SHVT), to perform state-space analysis on our automata in the setting of planning problem. As a case study, we revisit two tripartite key exchange protocols of Hitchcock, Boyd, and Gonzalez Nieto (2004), which carry claimed security proofs in the Canetti and Krawczyk (2001) model. We refute their proofs of security by pointing out previously unpublished flaws in the protocols using SHVT. We then point out corresponding flaws in the refuted proofs
在规划问题设置时,用模型检查器驳斥三方密钥交换的安全证明
我们使用异步积自动机(APA)对Canetti和Krawczyk(2001)形式主义的简化版本进行编码。然后,我们使用模型检查工具,简单同态验证工具(SHVT),在规划问题的设置中对我们的自动机执行状态空间分析。作为案例研究,我们回顾了Hitchcock, Boyd和Gonzalez Nieto(2004)的两个三方密钥交换协议,它们在Canetti和Krawczyk(2001)模型中携带声称的安全性证明。我们通过指出使用SHVT的协议中先前未公布的缺陷来反驳他们的安全性证明。然后,我们指出在被反驳的证据中相应的缺陷
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信