P-031 Effect of COVID-19 on acute ischemic stroke: population-level experience

Y. Kim, S. Khose, S. Salazar-Marioni, R. Abdelkhaleq, S. Sheth
{"title":"P-031 Effect of COVID-19 on acute ischemic stroke: population-level experience","authors":"Y. Kim, S. Khose, S. Salazar-Marioni, R. Abdelkhaleq, S. Sheth","doi":"10.1136/neurintsurg-2021-SNIS.67","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"IntroductionSeveral studies report substantial decreases in the volume of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) during the early stage of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Differences in characteristics of strokes such as increasing rates of large vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke were also observed comparing between pre-COVID and COVID eras. However, these findings were often based on data from selected hospitals or networks and estimates may be biased by level of stroke care and baseline case mix. A population-based study including rural hospitals and non-stroke centers covering a longer observation period beyond the early-pandemic epoch may lead to more accurate insights.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective population-based study using the Texas Inpatient Public Use Data File, capturing all discharges from hospitals in the State of Texas excluding federal hospitals. We assessed quarterly changes in volume, characteristics, care of AIS, and patient outcomes from April 1, 2019-June 30, 2020 and compared two time periods. 2020Q2 was defined as the pandemic period and the previous one year as the pre-pandemic period. Cases were defined as inpatient hospitalizations to acute care hospitals with a primary diagnosis of AIS. ICD-10 diagnosis and procedure codes were used to identify AIS, LVO, use of intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (IV-tPA) and endovascular treatment (EVT). Hospitals were determined as CSC (Comprehensive Stroke Center) and non-CSC based on designation by the Texas Department of State Health Services.ResultsThe number of AIS cases dropped substantially from 10,745 per quarter in the pre-pandemic period to 9,277 in the pandemic period (-14%) in Texas. The percentage of patients aged younger than 65 (39.0% vs 40.4%, p=0.014) and LVO stroke (30.0% vs 32.7%, p<0.001) slightly increased. Percentages of admission to CSC (39.1% vs 39.5%, p=0.57) and admission through inter-hospital transfer (9.6% vs 9.3%, p=0.35) remained similar between pre-pandemic and pandemic periods. There was also no significant change in the use of IV-tPA (14.1% vs 13.6%, P=0.20) or EVT (5.4% VS 5.8%, P=0.12). In-hospital mortality slightly increased from 2.9% to 3.2% but it was not statistically significant (p=0.13). However, the percentage of death or hospice discharge increased from 7.6% to 8.4% (p=0.003) and age and LVO type adjusted odds ratio was 1.13 (95% CI 1.04-1.23).Abstact P-031 Figure 1ConclusionIn this population-level study, significant decreases in AIS volume were observed with slightly higher incidence in younger population and higher LVO strokes. Rates of thrombolysis and thrombectomy remained unchanged but patients appeared to have worse outcomes.DisclosuresY. Kim: None. S. Khose: None. S. Salazar-Marioni: None. R. Abdelkhaleq: None. S. Sheth: None.","PeriodicalId":341680,"journal":{"name":"Oral poster abstracts","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral poster abstracts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2021-SNIS.67","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

IntroductionSeveral studies report substantial decreases in the volume of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) during the early stage of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Differences in characteristics of strokes such as increasing rates of large vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke were also observed comparing between pre-COVID and COVID eras. However, these findings were often based on data from selected hospitals or networks and estimates may be biased by level of stroke care and baseline case mix. A population-based study including rural hospitals and non-stroke centers covering a longer observation period beyond the early-pandemic epoch may lead to more accurate insights.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective population-based study using the Texas Inpatient Public Use Data File, capturing all discharges from hospitals in the State of Texas excluding federal hospitals. We assessed quarterly changes in volume, characteristics, care of AIS, and patient outcomes from April 1, 2019-June 30, 2020 and compared two time periods. 2020Q2 was defined as the pandemic period and the previous one year as the pre-pandemic period. Cases were defined as inpatient hospitalizations to acute care hospitals with a primary diagnosis of AIS. ICD-10 diagnosis and procedure codes were used to identify AIS, LVO, use of intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (IV-tPA) and endovascular treatment (EVT). Hospitals were determined as CSC (Comprehensive Stroke Center) and non-CSC based on designation by the Texas Department of State Health Services.ResultsThe number of AIS cases dropped substantially from 10,745 per quarter in the pre-pandemic period to 9,277 in the pandemic period (-14%) in Texas. The percentage of patients aged younger than 65 (39.0% vs 40.4%, p=0.014) and LVO stroke (30.0% vs 32.7%, p<0.001) slightly increased. Percentages of admission to CSC (39.1% vs 39.5%, p=0.57) and admission through inter-hospital transfer (9.6% vs 9.3%, p=0.35) remained similar between pre-pandemic and pandemic periods. There was also no significant change in the use of IV-tPA (14.1% vs 13.6%, P=0.20) or EVT (5.4% VS 5.8%, P=0.12). In-hospital mortality slightly increased from 2.9% to 3.2% but it was not statistically significant (p=0.13). However, the percentage of death or hospice discharge increased from 7.6% to 8.4% (p=0.003) and age and LVO type adjusted odds ratio was 1.13 (95% CI 1.04-1.23).Abstact P-031 Figure 1ConclusionIn this population-level study, significant decreases in AIS volume were observed with slightly higher incidence in younger population and higher LVO strokes. Rates of thrombolysis and thrombectomy remained unchanged but patients appeared to have worse outcomes.DisclosuresY. Kim: None. S. Khose: None. S. Salazar-Marioni: None. R. Abdelkhaleq: None. S. Sheth: None.
COVID-19对急性缺血性卒中的影响:人群水平的经验
几项研究报告称,在2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行的早期阶段,急性缺血性卒中(AIS)的数量大幅下降。我们还观察了冠状病毒病前和冠状病毒病期间卒中特征的差异,如大血管闭塞(LVO)卒中发生率的增加。然而,这些发现通常是基于选定医院或网络的数据,并且估计可能因卒中护理水平和基线病例组合而有偏差。一项以人口为基础的研究,包括农村医院和非中风中心,涵盖大流行早期之后更长的观察期,可能会带来更准确的见解。方法:我们使用德克萨斯州住院病人公共使用数据文件进行了一项基于人群的回顾性研究,收集了除联邦医院外德克萨斯州所有医院的出院病例。我们评估了2019年4月1日至2020年6月30日期间AIS数量、特征、护理和患者结局的季度变化,并比较了两个时间段。2020年第二季度被定义为大流行期,前一年被定义为大流行前期。病例定义为初步诊断为AIS的急性护理医院住院患者。使用ICD-10诊断和程序代码识别AIS、LVO、静脉组织型纤溶酶原激活剂(IV-tPA)的使用和血管内治疗(EVT)。医院被确定为CSC(综合中风中心)和非CSC基于指定的得克萨斯州卫生服务部门。结果德克萨斯州的AIS病例数从大流行前的每季度10745例大幅下降到大流行期间的9277例,下降了14%。65岁以下患者比例(39.0% vs 40.4%, p=0.014)和LVO卒中比例(30.0% vs 32.7%, p<0.001)略有增加。在大流行前和大流行期间,CSC入院比例(39.1%对39.5%,p=0.57)和通过医院间转院入院比例(9.6%对9.3%,p=0.35)保持相似。IV-tPA的使用(14.1% vs 13.6%, P=0.20)或EVT的使用(5.4% vs 5.8%, P=0.12)也没有显著变化。住院死亡率由2.9%上升至3.2%,但无统计学意义(p=0.13)。然而,死亡或临终关怀出院的百分比从7.6%增加到8.4% (p=0.003),年龄和LVO类型调整后的优势比为1.13 (95% CI 1.04-1.23)。结论在这项人群水平的研究中,观察到AIS体积显著下降,年轻人群和高LVO卒中发生率略高。溶栓和取栓率保持不变,但患者的预后似乎更差。金:没有。S. Khose:没有。萨拉扎-马里奥尼:没有。R. Abdelkhaleq:没有。S. Sheth:没有。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信