Meditation and Imagination

Sthaneshwar Timalsina
{"title":"Meditation and Imagination","authors":"Sthaneshwar Timalsina","doi":"10.1017/9781108580298.046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rather than simply exploring what imagination is, or providing a taxonomy of imagination, meditation manuals and their philosophical accounts describe a different domain of imagination: identifying imagination as one of the mental faculties that needs to be cultivated and trained with an underlying premise that imaginal acculturation has an enormous role to play in the subject’s mental health and his interaction with the society. Unfortunately, extant philosophical investigations of imagination in light of yogic and tantric materials has been overshadowed by the text-historical and scientific approaches, with the first focusing on the emergence of practice and its sociocultural boundaries, and the latter focusing on meditation and its relation to health. Historically, issues such as imagination or emotion have been neglected topics even in Western intellectual discourse. Classical texts written in Sanskrit come in contrasting flavors, with both positive and negative depictions of imagination. While a romantic understanding of imagination is vivid in literature and aesthetics, philosophical texts attribute a dubious role to imagination, with kalpanā (imagination) consistently being depicted, whether in Hindu or Buddhist philosophical texts, as a hindrance for recognizing reality or for veridical perception (Timalsina, 2013). In this latter presentation, kalpanā is equated with the monstrous power of māyā or illusion that projects the world that is not even there, and traps beings in their delirious slumber. This trend is changing, though, with new studies bringing to discourse the constructive role of imagination, particularly in contemplative practices.Visualization, primarily by means of playing with images, appears to dominate substantial space in the literature of meditation, and it also appears that since classical times, imagination has been identified by philosophers as a faculty to explore the nature of consciousness. Rather than these practices seeking to draw a line between fantasy and reality, they appear to use fantasy in order to reconstitute commonsense reality. This paper explores the extent to which these practices envision those possibilities. At the same time, this paper also identifies a conceptual framework for pursuing such an investigation. I engage with contemporary theories of imagination in order to contextualize some of the archaic practices of imagination and the justifications behind such practices. Meditation practice, any form of contemplative exercise among different cultures oriented toward altered mental and/or psychosomatic states, involves a substantial amount of imagination in its course. The insights derived from such practices can help","PeriodicalId":408592,"journal":{"name":"The Cambridge Handbook of the Imagination","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Cambridge Handbook of the Imagination","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108580298.046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rather than simply exploring what imagination is, or providing a taxonomy of imagination, meditation manuals and their philosophical accounts describe a different domain of imagination: identifying imagination as one of the mental faculties that needs to be cultivated and trained with an underlying premise that imaginal acculturation has an enormous role to play in the subject’s mental health and his interaction with the society. Unfortunately, extant philosophical investigations of imagination in light of yogic and tantric materials has been overshadowed by the text-historical and scientific approaches, with the first focusing on the emergence of practice and its sociocultural boundaries, and the latter focusing on meditation and its relation to health. Historically, issues such as imagination or emotion have been neglected topics even in Western intellectual discourse. Classical texts written in Sanskrit come in contrasting flavors, with both positive and negative depictions of imagination. While a romantic understanding of imagination is vivid in literature and aesthetics, philosophical texts attribute a dubious role to imagination, with kalpanā (imagination) consistently being depicted, whether in Hindu or Buddhist philosophical texts, as a hindrance for recognizing reality or for veridical perception (Timalsina, 2013). In this latter presentation, kalpanā is equated with the monstrous power of māyā or illusion that projects the world that is not even there, and traps beings in their delirious slumber. This trend is changing, though, with new studies bringing to discourse the constructive role of imagination, particularly in contemplative practices.Visualization, primarily by means of playing with images, appears to dominate substantial space in the literature of meditation, and it also appears that since classical times, imagination has been identified by philosophers as a faculty to explore the nature of consciousness. Rather than these practices seeking to draw a line between fantasy and reality, they appear to use fantasy in order to reconstitute commonsense reality. This paper explores the extent to which these practices envision those possibilities. At the same time, this paper also identifies a conceptual framework for pursuing such an investigation. I engage with contemporary theories of imagination in order to contextualize some of the archaic practices of imagination and the justifications behind such practices. Meditation practice, any form of contemplative exercise among different cultures oriented toward altered mental and/or psychosomatic states, involves a substantial amount of imagination in its course. The insights derived from such practices can help
冥想与想象
冥想手册及其哲学描述不是简单地探索想象力是什么,或提供想象力的分类,而是描述了想象力的一个不同领域:将想象力视为一种需要培养和训练的心理能力,其基本前提是想象文化适应在主体的心理健康和与社会的互动中发挥着巨大的作用。不幸的是,根据瑜伽和密宗材料对想象力的现有哲学研究已经被文本-历史和科学方法所掩盖,前者侧重于实践的出现及其社会文化界限,后者侧重于冥想及其与健康的关系。从历史上看,即使在西方知识分子的话语中,想象或情感等问题也一直被忽视。用梵文写的经典文本有着截然不同的风格,对想象力的描述既有积极的,也有消极的。虽然对想象力的浪漫理解在文学和美学中是生动的,但哲学文本将想象力归因于可疑的角色,无论是在印度教还是佛教哲学文本中,kalpanā(想象力)始终被描述为认识现实或真实感知的障碍(Timalsina, 2013)。在后一种表现中,kalpanā被等同于māyā或幻觉的巨大力量,它投射出甚至不存在的世界,并将生物困在他们谵妄的睡眠中。然而,随着新的研究将想象力的建设性作用,特别是在沉思练习中,这种趋势正在改变。可视化,主要是通过玩弄图像,似乎在冥想文献中占据了相当大的空间,而且自古典时代以来,想象力就被哲学家们认定为探索意识本质的一种能力。这些做法并不是试图在幻想和现实之间划清界限,他们似乎是用幻想来重建常识性的现实。本文探讨了这些实践设想这些可能性的程度。同时,本文还确定了进行这种调查的概念框架。我研究当代的想象理论是为了将一些古老的想象实践和这些实践背后的理由置于语境中。冥想练习,任何形式的冥想练习,在不同的文化中以改变精神和/或心身状态为导向,在其过程中涉及大量的想象力。从这些实践中获得的见解可以提供帮助
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信