Control Rights, Pyramids and Expropriation of State-Owned Listed Enterprises: Evidence from the Dual Class Share Reform in China

Mariko Watanabe
{"title":"Control Rights, Pyramids and Expropriation of State-Owned Listed Enterprises: Evidence from the Dual Class Share Reform in China","authors":"Mariko Watanabe","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2570776","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Literatures of corporate governance claim that expropriation by controlling owner towards the listed firm emerges when separation of cash flow and control rights exist, and that the separation emerges when dual class shares or pyramiding corporate structures exist. In China, dual class share and pyramiding coexisted in listed companies until the dual share reform was implemented since 2005. Exploiting this good exogenous change in the institution, which only resolve dual class share structure and pyramids remained, this paper tested how much the pyramiding allow the controlling owner to expropriate listed firm. Results show that: the larger control right and the Smaller cash flow right ear, size of expropriation becomes bigger; the expropriation is apparent For state controlled listed companies, though private owned firms do not. This is because level of control right ratio is higher than private though state firms's control-cash slow right ratio is Larger than a private one. While the dual class share reform weakened the power to expropriate, Separation still remains, and generates expropriation. Structural estimation shows the size of Expropriation to be 7 to 8 per cent of total assets at the main. If the one share one vote principle were to be realized, asset inflation could be reduced by 13 percent.","PeriodicalId":269711,"journal":{"name":"CGN: Firms Separating Cash Flow & Voting Rights: Dual Class & Pyramids (Topic)","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CGN: Firms Separating Cash Flow & Voting Rights: Dual Class & Pyramids (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2570776","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Literatures of corporate governance claim that expropriation by controlling owner towards the listed firm emerges when separation of cash flow and control rights exist, and that the separation emerges when dual class shares or pyramiding corporate structures exist. In China, dual class share and pyramiding coexisted in listed companies until the dual share reform was implemented since 2005. Exploiting this good exogenous change in the institution, which only resolve dual class share structure and pyramids remained, this paper tested how much the pyramiding allow the controlling owner to expropriate listed firm. Results show that: the larger control right and the Smaller cash flow right ear, size of expropriation becomes bigger; the expropriation is apparent For state controlled listed companies, though private owned firms do not. This is because level of control right ratio is higher than private though state firms's control-cash slow right ratio is Larger than a private one. While the dual class share reform weakened the power to expropriate, Separation still remains, and generates expropriation. Structural estimation shows the size of Expropriation to be 7 to 8 per cent of total assets at the main. If the one share one vote principle were to be realized, asset inflation could be reduced by 13 percent.
控制权、金字塔与国有上市企业征用:来自中国股权分置改革的证据
公司治理文献认为,控股人对上市公司的侵占是在现金流与控制权分离的情况下出现的,而在双层股权或金字塔型公司结构存在时,控股人对上市公司的侵占也会出现。在中国,直到2005年实行股权分置改革之前,上市公司一直是双层股权和金字塔结构并存。本文利用这一良好的制度外生变化,只解决了双层股权结构和金字塔结构的问题,检验了金字塔结构在多大程度上允许控股人对上市公司进行征收。结果表明:控制权越大,现金流右耳越小,征收规模越大;对于国有控股的上市公司来说,征用是显而易见的,尽管私营公司并非如此。这是因为虽然国有企业的控制权现金慢权比大于民营企业,但国有企业的控制权比高于民营企业。虽然双重股权改革削弱了征收的权力,但分业分立仍然存在,并产生了征收。结构性估计显示,征用规模主要占总资产的7%至8%。如果“一股一票”原则得以实现,资产通胀可以降低13%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信