Are Teaching and Research activities mutually exclusive? A Data Mining study on European Universities

Simona R. Grădinaru, A. Aldea, Levida Beşir, Crișan Albu
{"title":"Are Teaching and Research activities mutually exclusive? A Data Mining study on European Universities","authors":"Simona R. Grădinaru, A. Aldea, Levida Beşir, Crișan Albu","doi":"10.2478/icas-2019-0025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Universities all around the world operate by following several institutional missions, with a central purpose on teaching and research activities. The importance of each aspect alongside the connection between them provide a disputed topic in the literature, many authors confirming or rejecting the intuitive inverse relationship by using various means, more or less quantitative. This paper aims to examine the teaching and research dimensions of the research-active European universities from a data mining perspective. For each dimension previously considered we employ the K-means Clustering in order to identify the groups of similar higher education institutions and we analyze the insights produced by the results. In addition, we build some target variables considering the teaching and research outputs and we investigate their drivers by employing the Logistic Regression. Furthermore, we explore the controverted relationship between the two institutional missions we considered through the use of Correspondence Analysis. Preliminary results illustrate that the dataset contains two types of universities: a category of very large and prestigious institutions and a second group of small and medium sized institutions, quite different from each other. Interest insights are given by the third part of the study, in which the Correspondence Analysis confirms an inverse relationship between teaching and research activities. Unfortunately, this is very likely a consequence of the time constraint – both activities require the same limited resources and therefore increasing the teaching burden for academics may diminish the time and energy dedicated to research.","PeriodicalId":393626,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the International Conference on Applied Statistics","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the International Conference on Applied Statistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/icas-2019-0025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract Universities all around the world operate by following several institutional missions, with a central purpose on teaching and research activities. The importance of each aspect alongside the connection between them provide a disputed topic in the literature, many authors confirming or rejecting the intuitive inverse relationship by using various means, more or less quantitative. This paper aims to examine the teaching and research dimensions of the research-active European universities from a data mining perspective. For each dimension previously considered we employ the K-means Clustering in order to identify the groups of similar higher education institutions and we analyze the insights produced by the results. In addition, we build some target variables considering the teaching and research outputs and we investigate their drivers by employing the Logistic Regression. Furthermore, we explore the controverted relationship between the two institutional missions we considered through the use of Correspondence Analysis. Preliminary results illustrate that the dataset contains two types of universities: a category of very large and prestigious institutions and a second group of small and medium sized institutions, quite different from each other. Interest insights are given by the third part of the study, in which the Correspondence Analysis confirms an inverse relationship between teaching and research activities. Unfortunately, this is very likely a consequence of the time constraint – both activities require the same limited resources and therefore increasing the teaching burden for academics may diminish the time and energy dedicated to research.
教学和科研活动是否相互排斥?欧洲大学数据挖掘研究
世界各地的大学都遵循几个机构使命,以教学和研究活动为中心目的。每个方面的重要性以及它们之间的联系在文献中提供了一个有争议的话题,许多作者通过使用各种手段或多或少定量地确认或拒绝直观的反比关系。本文旨在从数据挖掘的角度考察欧洲研究型大学的教学和研究维度。对于之前考虑的每个维度,我们采用k均值聚类来识别相似高等教育机构的群体,并分析结果产生的见解。此外,我们考虑到教学和科研成果,建立了一些目标变量,并利用Logistic回归分析了它们的驱动因素。此外,我们通过使用对应分析探讨了我们所考虑的两个机构使命之间有争议的关系。初步结果表明,该数据集包含两种类型的大学:一类是非常大且享有盛誉的机构,另一类是中小型机构,彼此之间差异很大。研究的第三部分给出了兴趣见解,其中对应分析证实了教学与研究活动之间的反比关系。不幸的是,这很可能是时间限制的结果——这两种活动都需要同样有限的资源,因此增加学者的教学负担可能会减少用于研究的时间和精力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信