Normativity in Digital

R. Penner
{"title":"Normativity in Digital","authors":"R. Penner","doi":"10.15688/lp.jvolsu.2023.1.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The problem of normality and normativity in the digital context has become relevant. In the 21st century, digital, which has become to a certain extent an alternative to the physical, is one of the key spaces for the translation of norms, primarily social norms. Digital practices are ontologically different from their real prototypes. This thesis is illustrated in the article by referring to the series \"How to Sell Drugs Online (Fast)\". The key character of the work, young Moritz, lives the usual life of a nerd and is the founder of the first online drug empire. The article raises the question of what normativity is in digital and whether it is possible. Three levels of normativity are defined: biological (physiological norms), social (linguistic and legal norms), and universal (the normativity of the human being as an actant). These levels of normativity are determined by biological, social, and universal norms. Philosophically significant is the third, universal level. Within its boundaries, we are talking about norms and normativity, which are not necessarily attached to a person. A person is only one of many real and potential actants. In the digital context, on a par with a person, there are phenomena from the fields of technical (computers and any other gadgets) and technological (networks of various scales, including the Internet). The understanding of the norm and normativity in the digital context, therefore, develops in the vision of normativity at all 3 levels, with an emphasis on the universal level, which will create a post-anthropological prism in the digital studies.","PeriodicalId":398098,"journal":{"name":"Logos et Praxis","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Logos et Praxis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15688/lp.jvolsu.2023.1.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The problem of normality and normativity in the digital context has become relevant. In the 21st century, digital, which has become to a certain extent an alternative to the physical, is one of the key spaces for the translation of norms, primarily social norms. Digital practices are ontologically different from their real prototypes. This thesis is illustrated in the article by referring to the series "How to Sell Drugs Online (Fast)". The key character of the work, young Moritz, lives the usual life of a nerd and is the founder of the first online drug empire. The article raises the question of what normativity is in digital and whether it is possible. Three levels of normativity are defined: biological (physiological norms), social (linguistic and legal norms), and universal (the normativity of the human being as an actant). These levels of normativity are determined by biological, social, and universal norms. Philosophically significant is the third, universal level. Within its boundaries, we are talking about norms and normativity, which are not necessarily attached to a person. A person is only one of many real and potential actants. In the digital context, on a par with a person, there are phenomena from the fields of technical (computers and any other gadgets) and technological (networks of various scales, including the Internet). The understanding of the norm and normativity in the digital context, therefore, develops in the vision of normativity at all 3 levels, with an emphasis on the universal level, which will create a post-anthropological prism in the digital studies.
数字化的规范性
数字环境中的常态性和规范性问题已经变得相关。在21世纪,数字在一定程度上已经成为实体的替代品,是规范(主要是社会规范)翻译的关键空间之一。数字实践在本体论上不同于它们的真实原型。本文通过参考“如何在网上(快速)销售毒品”系列文章来说明这一论点。这部作品的主角,年轻的莫里茨,过着普通的书呆子生活,是第一个在线毒品帝国的创始人。这篇文章提出了一个问题,什么是规范性在数字和是否可能。规范性的三个层次被定义为:生物(生理规范),社会(语言和法律规范)和普遍(人类作为行动者的规范性)。这些规范水平是由生物、社会和普遍规范决定的。具有哲学意义的是第三个层面,即普遍层面。在它的范围内,我们谈论的是规范和规范性,它们不一定附属于一个人。人只是众多真实的和潜在的行动者之一。在数字环境中,与人一样,有来自技术领域(计算机和任何其他小工具)和技术领域(各种规模的网络,包括互联网)的现象。因此,对数字环境中规范和规范性的理解在所有三个层面的规范性视野中发展,重点放在普遍层面,这将在数字研究中创造一个后人类学的棱镜。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信