S. Choudhary, A. Sachdeva, Vikas Jaiswal, M. N. Qureshi
{"title":"Thermal Performance and Economic Analysis of MgO and ZnI Nanofluid Based Flat Plate Solar Collector","authors":"S. Choudhary, A. Sachdeva, Vikas Jaiswal, M. N. Qureshi","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3947581","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Keeping the view of higher outlet temperature, the present study assessed the performance of ZnO and MgO nanofluid-based flat plate solar collector at the low volumetric flow rate, i.e., 30 L/h. As a critical finding, it is not urged to use the nanofluid-based collector at location and times of lower solar fluxes due to low percentage enhancement in thermal efficiency. The thermal efficiency was about 67.98% and 65.22% for 1 vol% ZnO and 0.2 vol% MgO, respectively, almost 20.57% and 16.53% more than ethylene glycol:distilled water. For respective nanofluids, the heat absorption parameter intensified by 20.48% and 17.12%. In comparison to electric heating, the payback period at the optimum concentrations of ZnO and MgO nanofluid-based flat plate solar collector was approximately 2.97 and 3.69 years, respectively. Regarding present worth, the cost savings in a life span of fifteen years was approximately ₹ 1,43,732 and ₹ 1,37,803 for 1 vol% ZnO and 0.2 vol% MgO, respectively. Such gains could be extortionate with a large effective area of collectors. The 1 vol% ZnO at 30 L/h ought the shortest payback period and highest cost-saving, hence, profoundly commended in the flat plate solar collector instead of the base fluid.","PeriodicalId":163818,"journal":{"name":"EnergyRN EM Feeds","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EnergyRN EM Feeds","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3947581","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Keeping the view of higher outlet temperature, the present study assessed the performance of ZnO and MgO nanofluid-based flat plate solar collector at the low volumetric flow rate, i.e., 30 L/h. As a critical finding, it is not urged to use the nanofluid-based collector at location and times of lower solar fluxes due to low percentage enhancement in thermal efficiency. The thermal efficiency was about 67.98% and 65.22% for 1 vol% ZnO and 0.2 vol% MgO, respectively, almost 20.57% and 16.53% more than ethylene glycol:distilled water. For respective nanofluids, the heat absorption parameter intensified by 20.48% and 17.12%. In comparison to electric heating, the payback period at the optimum concentrations of ZnO and MgO nanofluid-based flat plate solar collector was approximately 2.97 and 3.69 years, respectively. Regarding present worth, the cost savings in a life span of fifteen years was approximately ₹ 1,43,732 and ₹ 1,37,803 for 1 vol% ZnO and 0.2 vol% MgO, respectively. Such gains could be extortionate with a large effective area of collectors. The 1 vol% ZnO at 30 L/h ought the shortest payback period and highest cost-saving, hence, profoundly commended in the flat plate solar collector instead of the base fluid.