Ranahar: Textuality of History, Culture and Politics

Dr. Keshav Raj Chalise
{"title":"Ranahar: Textuality of History, Culture and Politics","authors":"Dr. Keshav Raj Chalise","doi":"10.3126/jbkc.v10i1.42090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The question of the relation between the history and the literature is a central question of historicism and new historicism. Literature is not possible without the influence of the time; past or present. The depiction of the past is the picture of history in the text, and the portrayal of present becomes the history in the future, hence the literary text is not free from the history in any way. Furthermore, some tests intentionally present the history, not as exactly as the history, but as the interpretation of the history, hence the mode of new historical way of understanding the text. Yogesh Raj's Ranahar provides the lost history of Malla dynasty, primarily the history of the last Malla king, Ranajit. The book is not a pure imagination, neither is it a pure history, but it has the combination of the historical facts and his imagination. Reading this novel, as a fiction, just as pure imagination is an injustice to the veiled part of its history. With the background of the history of Bhaktapur, this article examines the novel Ranahar from historical and new historical perspective on how literature has become a medium to reveal the lost history, the textuality of history.","PeriodicalId":394565,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Balkumari College","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Balkumari College","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/jbkc.v10i1.42090","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The question of the relation between the history and the literature is a central question of historicism and new historicism. Literature is not possible without the influence of the time; past or present. The depiction of the past is the picture of history in the text, and the portrayal of present becomes the history in the future, hence the literary text is not free from the history in any way. Furthermore, some tests intentionally present the history, not as exactly as the history, but as the interpretation of the history, hence the mode of new historical way of understanding the text. Yogesh Raj's Ranahar provides the lost history of Malla dynasty, primarily the history of the last Malla king, Ranajit. The book is not a pure imagination, neither is it a pure history, but it has the combination of the historical facts and his imagination. Reading this novel, as a fiction, just as pure imagination is an injustice to the veiled part of its history. With the background of the history of Bhaktapur, this article examines the novel Ranahar from historical and new historical perspective on how literature has become a medium to reveal the lost history, the textuality of history.
拉纳哈:历史、文化和政治的文本性
历史与文学的关系问题是历史主义和新历史主义的核心问题。文学不可能没有时代的影响;过去或现在。对过去的描绘是文本中的历史图景,对现在的描绘成为未来的历史,因此文学文本在任何方面都不能脱离历史。此外,一些考试有意地呈现历史,而不是作为历史,而是作为对历史的解释,从而形成了一种新的理解文本的历史方式模式。Yogesh Raj的《拉纳哈》提供了马拉王朝失落的历史,主要是最后一位马拉国王拉纳吉特的历史。这本书不是纯粹的想象,也不是纯粹的历史,而是历史事实和他的想象的结合。把这部小说当作小说来读,就像纯粹的想象一样,是对其历史中被遮蔽的部分的一种不公正。本文以巴克塔普尔的历史为背景,从历史和新历史的角度考察小说《拉纳哈》,探讨文学如何成为揭示失落的历史、历史的文本性的媒介。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信