Relational Design

V. Udoewa, Savannah Gress
{"title":"Relational Design","authors":"V. Udoewa, Savannah Gress","doi":"10.47061/jasc.v3i1.5193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Participatory design occurs when professional designers do design work with the community members who will use the design. Traditional (colonial) participatory design leaves the choice of methodology in the hands of the professional designer, the leader or facilitator, who often chooses extractivist methods and methodologies, contradicting the very relationality, equity, and participation intended through participatory design. Using such methods in participatory design creates situations in which participating community members conduct extractivist, transactional methods against their own communities. In contrast, Radical Participatory Design decolonizes participatory processes as communities not only equally participate, but also equitably lead the design process, naturally leading to asset-based methodologies. Though Radical Participatory Design is a type of relational design because the design process is done relationally elevating relational knowledge and expertise, we go further to describe an explicit Relational Design.\nWhat would a design process look like if we not only conduct it participatorily, but also replace extractivist, transactional activities with relational ones? Because design involves the production and solicitation of knowledge, we rearticulate knowledge as the presence of healthy relationships. With that understanding we describe Relational Design. We discuss the connection between systems and relationships and why Relational Design is important for positive systems change and impact. We then describe one possible and specific relational methodology that we have used in the space of educational systems: the sustained dialogue framework. Using this framework, we discuss how each phase of a generic design process changes when using a relational methodology like sustained dialogue. As the health of relationships in a system increases, the need or usefulness of positivist methods based on third-person knowing decreases.","PeriodicalId":243406,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Awareness-Based Systems Change","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Awareness-Based Systems Change","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47061/jasc.v3i1.5193","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Participatory design occurs when professional designers do design work with the community members who will use the design. Traditional (colonial) participatory design leaves the choice of methodology in the hands of the professional designer, the leader or facilitator, who often chooses extractivist methods and methodologies, contradicting the very relationality, equity, and participation intended through participatory design. Using such methods in participatory design creates situations in which participating community members conduct extractivist, transactional methods against their own communities. In contrast, Radical Participatory Design decolonizes participatory processes as communities not only equally participate, but also equitably lead the design process, naturally leading to asset-based methodologies. Though Radical Participatory Design is a type of relational design because the design process is done relationally elevating relational knowledge and expertise, we go further to describe an explicit Relational Design. What would a design process look like if we not only conduct it participatorily, but also replace extractivist, transactional activities with relational ones? Because design involves the production and solicitation of knowledge, we rearticulate knowledge as the presence of healthy relationships. With that understanding we describe Relational Design. We discuss the connection between systems and relationships and why Relational Design is important for positive systems change and impact. We then describe one possible and specific relational methodology that we have used in the space of educational systems: the sustained dialogue framework. Using this framework, we discuss how each phase of a generic design process changes when using a relational methodology like sustained dialogue. As the health of relationships in a system increases, the need or usefulness of positivist methods based on third-person knowing decreases.
关系设计
当专业设计师与使用设计的社区成员一起进行设计工作时,就会出现参与式设计。传统的(殖民式的)参与式设计将方法论的选择交给了专业设计师、领导者或推动者,他们通常会选择抽取式的方法和方法论,这与参与式设计的关系、公平和参与性相矛盾。在参与式设计中使用这样的方法会造成这样的情况:参与的社区成员会对自己的社区采取掠夺性、交易性的方法。相比之下,激进参与式设计使参与式过程去殖民化,因为社区不仅平等参与,而且公平地领导设计过程,自然导致基于资产的方法。虽然激进参与式设计是一种关系设计,因为设计过程是通过关系提升关系知识和专业知识来完成的,但我们将进一步描述一种显式关系设计。如果设计过程不仅是参与性的,而且还用关系性的活动取代了抽取性的、事务性的活动,那么设计过程会是什么样子呢?因为设计涉及到知识的产生和征求,所以我们将知识重新表述为健康关系的存在。基于这样的理解,我们来描述关系设计。我们讨论系统和关系之间的联系,以及为什么关系设计对积极的系统变化和影响很重要。然后,我们描述了我们在教育系统空间中使用的一种可能的和具体的关系方法:持续对话框架。使用这个框架,我们将讨论在使用像持续对话这样的关系方法时,通用设计过程的每个阶段是如何变化的。随着系统中关系的健康度增加,基于第三人称认知的实证方法的需求或有用性就会减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信