Bringing Women Together, in Theory

A. Pease
{"title":"Bringing Women Together, in Theory","authors":"A. Pease","doi":"10.2307/j.ctvx070vh.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"“Bringing Women Together, in Theory” explores which theories allow feminist modernist scholars to treat as worthy subjects of study more women writers than just those representative few about whom most monographs have been written, thus levelling the playing field between so-called major and minor writers. In the late twentieth-century the historically tense relationship between feminist criticism’s roots in liberal humanism, even as it has had to argue against its definitional constraints, put it in conceptual tension with post-structuralist theory from which feminist theory stemmed. These differences created a contentious and hierarchical relationship in the late-twentieth century between feminist scholars of modernism from which we may now just be emerging. This chapter analyzes the work of May Sinclair and also explores affect theory, low theory, transvaluation, and skepticism.","PeriodicalId":434558,"journal":{"name":"Women Making Modernism","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Women Making Modernism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvx070vh.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

“Bringing Women Together, in Theory” explores which theories allow feminist modernist scholars to treat as worthy subjects of study more women writers than just those representative few about whom most monographs have been written, thus levelling the playing field between so-called major and minor writers. In the late twentieth-century the historically tense relationship between feminist criticism’s roots in liberal humanism, even as it has had to argue against its definitional constraints, put it in conceptual tension with post-structuralist theory from which feminist theory stemmed. These differences created a contentious and hierarchical relationship in the late-twentieth century between feminist scholars of modernism from which we may now just be emerging. This chapter analyzes the work of May Sinclair and also explores affect theory, low theory, transvaluation, and skepticism.
从理论上讲,让女性团结起来
“把女性聚集在一起,在理论上”探讨了哪些理论允许女权主义现代主义学者将更多的女性作家视为有价值的研究对象,而不仅仅是那些具有代表性的少数女性作家,而大多数专著都是关于她们的,从而在所谓的主要作家和次要作家之间建立公平的竞争环境。在二十世纪后期,女权主义批评根源于自由人文主义之间的历史紧张关系,即使它不得不反对其定义约束,也使其与女权主义理论的起源后结构主义理论在概念上处于紧张状态。这些差异在20世纪后期的现代主义女权主义学者之间形成了一种有争议的等级关系,我们现在可能刚刚摆脱这种关系。本章分析了梅·辛克莱的作品,并探讨了情感理论、低理论、重估和怀疑主义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信