Wheel wear prediction - comparison between analytical approaches and field tests

A. Lari
{"title":"Wheel wear prediction - comparison between analytical approaches and field tests","authors":"A. Lari","doi":"10.1115/JRC2006-94054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are a number of theoretical and practical techniques to compute rail vehicle wheel wear. For instance, the Archard equation is a well-known tool to determine the worn volume in sliding contact, although it was established for normal loads, sliding distance and the surface hardness. Of course the wear coefficient (called K) used in this equation to differentiate the wear modes, implicitly comprises the conditions that govern the contact surface. Two situations can be taken into account when considering a sliding contact, particularly along a curved track: i) when the radial force prevails the lateral tangential force, which is mainly the frictional force but before flanging and ii) during flange contact. Also, the Archard equation is employed within the tread and flange regions separately, both the regions being of interest in this paper. A number of approaches are then used to find the distance slid. The author compares the field test results and the outcome of the analytical approaches. The wheel wear results acquired from the two test bogies on Iranian Railways when all technical (rigid frame bogies with new assemblies and components) and operational items were identical, except for changing the bogie orientation in the second test trial for a short period. Good agreement was found between the analytical and practical investigations","PeriodicalId":292357,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE/ASME Joint Rail Conference","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE/ASME Joint Rail Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/JRC2006-94054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There are a number of theoretical and practical techniques to compute rail vehicle wheel wear. For instance, the Archard equation is a well-known tool to determine the worn volume in sliding contact, although it was established for normal loads, sliding distance and the surface hardness. Of course the wear coefficient (called K) used in this equation to differentiate the wear modes, implicitly comprises the conditions that govern the contact surface. Two situations can be taken into account when considering a sliding contact, particularly along a curved track: i) when the radial force prevails the lateral tangential force, which is mainly the frictional force but before flanging and ii) during flange contact. Also, the Archard equation is employed within the tread and flange regions separately, both the regions being of interest in this paper. A number of approaches are then used to find the distance slid. The author compares the field test results and the outcome of the analytical approaches. The wheel wear results acquired from the two test bogies on Iranian Railways when all technical (rigid frame bogies with new assemblies and components) and operational items were identical, except for changing the bogie orientation in the second test trial for a short period. Good agreement was found between the analytical and practical investigations
车轮磨损预测。分析方法与现场试验的比较
轨道车辆车轮磨损的计算有许多理论和实践方法。例如,Archard方程是确定滑动接触中磨损体积的一个众所周知的工具,尽管它是针对法向载荷、滑动距离和表面硬度建立的。当然,在这个方程中用来区分磨损模式的磨损系数(称为K)隐含地包含了控制接触面的条件。当考虑滑动接触时,特别是沿着弯曲轨道时,可以考虑两种情况:i)当径向力占主导地位时,侧向切向力主要是摩擦力,但在翻边之前;ii)在法兰接触期间。此外,Archard方程分别在胎面和法兰区域内使用,这两个区域都是本文感兴趣的区域。然后使用许多方法来找到滑动的距离。作者将现场试验结果与分析方法的结果进行了比较。除了在第二次短期试验中改变转向架方向外,所有技术(带有新组件和部件的刚性框架转向架)和操作项目都是相同的,从伊朗铁路的两个测试转向架上获得的车轮磨损结果。分析与实际调查结果吻合良好
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信