Improved Total Organic Carbon (TOC) Prediction for Vaca Muerta Shale

Rahimah Abd Karim, R. Aguilera, Camila Fraga, Laura Estela Toledo
{"title":"Improved Total Organic Carbon (TOC) Prediction for Vaca Muerta Shale","authors":"Rahimah Abd Karim, R. Aguilera, Camila Fraga, Laura Estela Toledo","doi":"10.2118/212422-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n TOC evaluation in Vaca Muerta is challenging due to its complex mineralogy and depositional settings. Laboratory measurements can be affected by sample preparation, especially for wells drilled with oil-based mud. Empirical methods like Passey ∆log R relies on resistivity as one of the inputs, which can be affected by clay and mineralogy in shale. In this study, an improved TOC prediction using a multiple regression equation is proposed. The findings reflect the vertical variability of TOC.\n The method developed in this study first evaluates the TOC correlation with available electrical logs from a vertical well that includes spectral gamma ray, neutron porosity, density and resistivity. It also assesses the correlation with clay and inorganic mineralogy available from X-ray diffraction. This study also incorporates for the first time, thin bed heterogeneity that comprises calcite beef, ash beds and nodules. They make up a considerable portion of the facies, especially in the organic-rich unit of Lower Vaca Muerta (LVM). Despite the complexity, the modelled TOC calibrate well with the laboratory-measured TOC.\n The TOC regression equation is developed based on two key findings. First, the TOC is positively correlated with uranium and resistivity; and negatively correlated with dolomite and calcite. High TOC is observed in low Ca (calcite, dolomite and ankerite) and high QFP (quartz, k-feldspar and plagioclase) intervals, and vice versa. This negative correlation is unique to Vaca Muerta, which is attributed to the mixed carbonate-siliciclastic depositional system (Kietzmann et al., 2014). Second, the TOC is also strongly affected by thin bed heterogeneity that is identified through micro-resistivity image log and high-resolution logs. Their effect is more pronounced on resistivity log; therefore, an adjustment factor is applied to the regression to account for their presences. Results show that the modelled TOC match well the core TOC as compared to Passey ∆log R method. An important observation is that the Passey ∆log R technique would overestimate the TOC at the top of Upper Vaca Muerta due to high and resistive Ca content; and underestimate it in LVM due to conductive clay in the argillaceous ash beds. Consequently, it would mislead the estimation of reservoir thickness, identification of sweet spot for landing zones, as well as resource estimation in Vaca Muerta shale.\n This paper develops an original regression equation that models TOC in the presence of thin bed heterogeneity in Vaca Muerta. The results compare well with the laboratory-measured TOC. The study reveals the vertical variability of TOC across the five stratigraphic units in a vertical well. More importantly, it highlights potential TOC discrepancy by Passey ∆log R technique that could mislead reservoir thickness estimation due to the effects of mineralogy and thin bed heterogeneity on resistivity.","PeriodicalId":242465,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Wed, March 22, 2023","volume":"137 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Wed, March 22, 2023","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/212422-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

TOC evaluation in Vaca Muerta is challenging due to its complex mineralogy and depositional settings. Laboratory measurements can be affected by sample preparation, especially for wells drilled with oil-based mud. Empirical methods like Passey ∆log R relies on resistivity as one of the inputs, which can be affected by clay and mineralogy in shale. In this study, an improved TOC prediction using a multiple regression equation is proposed. The findings reflect the vertical variability of TOC. The method developed in this study first evaluates the TOC correlation with available electrical logs from a vertical well that includes spectral gamma ray, neutron porosity, density and resistivity. It also assesses the correlation with clay and inorganic mineralogy available from X-ray diffraction. This study also incorporates for the first time, thin bed heterogeneity that comprises calcite beef, ash beds and nodules. They make up a considerable portion of the facies, especially in the organic-rich unit of Lower Vaca Muerta (LVM). Despite the complexity, the modelled TOC calibrate well with the laboratory-measured TOC. The TOC regression equation is developed based on two key findings. First, the TOC is positively correlated with uranium and resistivity; and negatively correlated with dolomite and calcite. High TOC is observed in low Ca (calcite, dolomite and ankerite) and high QFP (quartz, k-feldspar and plagioclase) intervals, and vice versa. This negative correlation is unique to Vaca Muerta, which is attributed to the mixed carbonate-siliciclastic depositional system (Kietzmann et al., 2014). Second, the TOC is also strongly affected by thin bed heterogeneity that is identified through micro-resistivity image log and high-resolution logs. Their effect is more pronounced on resistivity log; therefore, an adjustment factor is applied to the regression to account for their presences. Results show that the modelled TOC match well the core TOC as compared to Passey ∆log R method. An important observation is that the Passey ∆log R technique would overestimate the TOC at the top of Upper Vaca Muerta due to high and resistive Ca content; and underestimate it in LVM due to conductive clay in the argillaceous ash beds. Consequently, it would mislead the estimation of reservoir thickness, identification of sweet spot for landing zones, as well as resource estimation in Vaca Muerta shale. This paper develops an original regression equation that models TOC in the presence of thin bed heterogeneity in Vaca Muerta. The results compare well with the laboratory-measured TOC. The study reveals the vertical variability of TOC across the five stratigraphic units in a vertical well. More importantly, it highlights potential TOC discrepancy by Passey ∆log R technique that could mislead reservoir thickness estimation due to the effects of mineralogy and thin bed heterogeneity on resistivity.
Vaca Muerta页岩总有机碳(TOC)预测方法改进
由于其复杂的矿物学和沉积环境,Vaca Muerta的TOC评估具有挑战性。实验室测量可能会受到样品制备的影响,特别是对于使用油基泥浆钻井的井。像Passey∆log R这样的经验方法依赖于电阻率作为输入之一,这可能受到页岩中粘土和矿物学的影响。本文提出了一种基于多元回归方程的改进TOC预测方法。这些结果反映了TOC的垂直变化。本研究中开发的方法首先评估了TOC与直井电测井的相关性,包括谱伽马射线、中子孔隙度、密度和电阻率。它还评估了从x射线衍射可获得的粘土和无机矿物学的相关性。该研究还首次纳入了包括方解石牛肉、灰层和结核在内的薄层非均质性。它们在该相中占相当大的比例,特别是在下穆埃尔塔(LVM)富有机质单元中。尽管复杂,但模型TOC与实验室测量的TOC可以很好地校准。TOC回归方程是基于两个关键发现发展起来的。首先,TOC与铀、电阻率呈正相关;与白云石、方解石呈负相关。低Ca层(方解石、白云石和铁白云石)和高QFP层(石英、钾长石和斜长石)的TOC含量较高,反之亦然。这种负相关性是Vaca Muerta独有的,归因于碳酸盐-硅-碎屑混合沉积体系(Kietzmann et al., 2014)。其次,通过微电阻率成像测井和高分辨率测井确定的薄层非均质性也会对TOC产生强烈影响。其对电阻率测井的影响更为明显;因此,在回归中应用一个调整因子来解释它们的存在。结果表明,与Passey∆log R方法相比,模拟的TOC与岩心TOC吻合较好。一个重要的观察结果是,由于Ca含量高且具有电阻性,Passey∆log R技术会高估Upper Vaca Muerta顶部的TOC;而在LVM中,由于泥质灰层中的导电粘土而低估了它。因此,它会误导储层厚度的估计、着陆带甜点的识别以及Vaca Muerta页岩资源的估计。本文建立了一个原始的回归方程,用于模拟Vaca Muerta存在薄层非均质时的TOC。结果与实验室测得的TOC值吻合较好。研究揭示了直井中5个地层单元TOC的垂向变化规律。更重要的是,它突出了Passey∆log R技术潜在的TOC差异,由于矿物学和薄层非均质性对电阻率的影响,这种差异可能会误导储层厚度估计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信