Smith Predictor-based Controllers for Temperature Process with Time Delay

Ivan Manuel Iampita, S. B. Hisham
{"title":"Smith Predictor-based Controllers for Temperature Process with Time Delay","authors":"Ivan Manuel Iampita, S. B. Hisham","doi":"10.1109/SCORED.2019.8896245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Smith Predictor (SP) control structure is usually developed around a proportional-integral (PI) controller to improve the performance of processes with time delay. However, this technique has shortcomings as it depends on the exact representation of the process model, does not guarantee robustness and it is sensitive to process delay variation. A temperature control experiment is conducted on a shell-tube heat exchanger due to its time delay presence characteristic. A process model is obtained through a statistical modelling identification. Using Matlab/Simulink to simulate the control of the temperature process loop, a PI and Smith Predictor-PI (SP-PI) controllers are developed and compared to prove the effectiveness of the latter. Later both controllers are compared to a Filtered Smith Predictor (FSP) to offer benchmark comparison. Investigation is conducted on the ability of the SP-PI and FSP control structures to robustly control a temperature feedback loop when the process time delay is varied and results show that they are both efficient. Moreover, limits to reducing the effects caused by time delay are dependent on the choice of robust element value and sampling time choice for the SP-PI and FSP structures respectively. The control performance of both structures are compared using indicators such as Integral Absolute Error (IAE), Integral Squared Error (ISE), settling time, rise time and overshoot.","PeriodicalId":231004,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE Student Conference on Research and Development (SCOReD)","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE Student Conference on Research and Development (SCOReD)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SCORED.2019.8896245","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Smith Predictor (SP) control structure is usually developed around a proportional-integral (PI) controller to improve the performance of processes with time delay. However, this technique has shortcomings as it depends on the exact representation of the process model, does not guarantee robustness and it is sensitive to process delay variation. A temperature control experiment is conducted on a shell-tube heat exchanger due to its time delay presence characteristic. A process model is obtained through a statistical modelling identification. Using Matlab/Simulink to simulate the control of the temperature process loop, a PI and Smith Predictor-PI (SP-PI) controllers are developed and compared to prove the effectiveness of the latter. Later both controllers are compared to a Filtered Smith Predictor (FSP) to offer benchmark comparison. Investigation is conducted on the ability of the SP-PI and FSP control structures to robustly control a temperature feedback loop when the process time delay is varied and results show that they are both efficient. Moreover, limits to reducing the effects caused by time delay are dependent on the choice of robust element value and sampling time choice for the SP-PI and FSP structures respectively. The control performance of both structures are compared using indicators such as Integral Absolute Error (IAE), Integral Squared Error (ISE), settling time, rise time and overshoot.
基于Smith预测的时滞温度过程控制器
史密斯预测器(SP)控制结构通常是围绕比例积分(PI)控制器开发的,以改善具有时滞的过程的性能。然而,该方法存在着依赖于过程模型的精确表示、不能保证鲁棒性和对过程延迟变化敏感等缺点。利用壳管换热器的时滞存在特性,对其进行了温度控制实验。通过统计建模识别,得到过程模型。利用Matlab/Simulink对温度过程回路的控制进行仿真,开发了PI控制器和Smith预估PI (SP-PI)控制器,并对后者的有效性进行了比较。之后,将两个控制器与滤波史密斯预测器(FSP)进行比较,以提供基准比较。研究了SP-PI和FSP控制结构在过程时滞变化时对温度反馈回路的鲁棒控制能力,结果表明它们都是有效的。此外,对于SP-PI和FSP结构,降低时延影响的限制分别取决于鲁棒元值的选择和采样时间的选择。利用积分绝对误差(IAE)、积分平方误差(ISE)、沉降时间、上升时间和超调量等指标对两种结构的控制性能进行了比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信