Weekend and Cannibal Holocaust: Art, Ballyhoo and Remediation

S. Hobbs
{"title":"Weekend and Cannibal Holocaust: Art, Ballyhoo and Remediation","authors":"S. Hobbs","doi":"10.3366/edinburgh/9781474427371.003.0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter starts with an assessment of Jean-Luc Godard’s auteur status, before focusing on Weekend, a film frequently overlooked in discussions of extreme art cinema. By drawing attention to the film’s depiction of cannibalism, rape and real animal slaughter, the chapter highlights the similarities it shares with other extreme texts, repositioning it within the boarder extreme art film tradition outlined throughout the book. To find out whether this reputation impacts the commercial identity of the film, the chapter moves on to explore the paratextuality of the film. Ultimately concluding that the film’s distributors (Artificial Eye) offer a hybridised object that flirts with extremity, the chapter then examines Ruggero Deodato’s Cannibal Holocaust. Noting similarities between the films, the chapter provides a detailed analysis of Shameless Screen Entertainment collectors’ edition DVD. Showing how the paratextual material re-constructs the film’s history, the analysis argues that Cannibal Holocaust’s remediation moves it away from an exploitation film ghetto by employing traditionally highbrow marketing techniques. By complicating existing ideas regarding the commercial function of extremity, the chapter illustrates the extent to which home entertainment objects obscure long-standing taste distinctions.","PeriodicalId":310994,"journal":{"name":"Cultivating Extreme Art Cinema","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cultivating Extreme Art Cinema","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474427371.003.0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter starts with an assessment of Jean-Luc Godard’s auteur status, before focusing on Weekend, a film frequently overlooked in discussions of extreme art cinema. By drawing attention to the film’s depiction of cannibalism, rape and real animal slaughter, the chapter highlights the similarities it shares with other extreme texts, repositioning it within the boarder extreme art film tradition outlined throughout the book. To find out whether this reputation impacts the commercial identity of the film, the chapter moves on to explore the paratextuality of the film. Ultimately concluding that the film’s distributors (Artificial Eye) offer a hybridised object that flirts with extremity, the chapter then examines Ruggero Deodato’s Cannibal Holocaust. Noting similarities between the films, the chapter provides a detailed analysis of Shameless Screen Entertainment collectors’ edition DVD. Showing how the paratextual material re-constructs the film’s history, the analysis argues that Cannibal Holocaust’s remediation moves it away from an exploitation film ghetto by employing traditionally highbrow marketing techniques. By complicating existing ideas regarding the commercial function of extremity, the chapter illustrates the extent to which home entertainment objects obscure long-standing taste distinctions.
周末和食人大屠杀:艺术,宣传和补救
本章从评估开始让-吕克·戈达尔的电影导演地位,专注于周末之前,电影经常被忽视在讨论极端的艺术电影。通过关注电影对同类相食、强奸和真实动物屠杀的描述,本章强调了它与其他极端文本的相似之处,并将其重新定位在整个书中概述的极端艺术电影传统中。为了找出这种声誉是否影响了电影的商业身份,本章继续探讨电影的准性。最后得出的结论是,这部电影的发行商(《人造眼》)提供了一个与极端行为相结合的混合体,然后本章审视了鲁杰罗·迪奥达托的《食人大屠杀》。注意到电影之间的相似之处,本章提供了无耻银幕娱乐收藏版DVD的详细分析。分析表明,通过采用传统的高雅营销技巧,《食人族大屠杀》的补救措施使其远离了剥削电影的贫民窟,展示了这些文本材料是如何重建电影的历史的。通过将关于肢体的商业功能的现有想法复杂化,本章说明了家庭娱乐对象在多大程度上模糊了长期存在的品味差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信