The development of good governance model for performance improvement

Haliah Haliah, N. Nirwana
{"title":"The development of good governance model for performance improvement","authors":"Haliah Haliah, N. Nirwana","doi":"10.1108/IJEG-09-2018-0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe purpose of this paper is to re-test the determinant factors of the quality of financial statements and performance of the government by adding contextual factors, such as the personal factor, system/administrative factor and political factor, that may affect the quality of financial statement information and performance of the government. The personal factor is proxied to the competencies that affect the quality of financial statements and performance. The social administrative factor is proxied on the regulations and presentation of quality financial statements.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe analysis unit in this study was conducted at the organizational level. The research object was in the South Sulawesi Province. This was a descriptive and verificative research with a survey technique. Based on the objectives of the research, this is an explanatory study. The research method used was an explanatory survey with a quantitative approach. The population of this research was proxied to the Regional Unit Organization (Organisasi Perangkat Desa/OPD) which compiled the financial statements in the South Sulawesi Provincial Government and consisted of 803 units of local government agencies (Satuan Kerja Perangkat Daerah or SKPD). The purposive sampling technique was chosen under the following criteria: the regional government whose financial statement has been audited by the BPK, the regional government whose financial accountability report has been evaluated by Indonesia’s Agency for Financial, and Development Supervision (Badan Pengawasan Keuangan dan Pembangunan or BPKP). In line with the criteria mentioned above, the minimum samples required for 26 observations/indicators are 5 × 26 = 130 respondents. The sample size met the minimum sample requirement of five for each group (cell) (Hair et al., 2006, p. 112).\n\n\nFindings\nThe personal factor “competence” affects the financial statements’ quality. The high personal factor “competence” will affect the high financial statements’ quality. The system/administration factor “regulation” affects the financial statement quality. The high system/administration factor “regulation” will affect the high financial statements’ quality. Political factors affect the financial statements’ quality. The high political factors will affect the high financial statements’ quality. The personal factor “competence” has no direct effect on the performance. The high personal factor “competence” will not affect the high or low of the performance. However, there is a significant indirect effect between the personal factor “competence” on performance through the financial statements’ quality, which means that the higher personal factor “competence” will lead to higher performance through financial statements’ quality. The system/administration factor “regulation” does not directly affect the performance. The high system/administration factor “regulation” will not affect the high or low of the performance. However there is a significant indirect effect between the system/administration factor “regulation” on performance through the financial statements’ quality which means that higher system/administration factor “regulation” will lead to higher performance through financial statements’ quality. The political factor does not directly affect the performance. The high political factors will not affect the high or low of the performance. However there is a significant indirect effect between political factors on performance through the financial statements’ quality which means that the higher political factor will lead to higher performance through the financial statements’ quality. Financial statements’ quality affects the performance. The high financial statements will affect the performance.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe research issues raised are the increasing public demands for the government services and accountability, while on the other hand, the government is faced with the report and financial quality that are below the expectation. This issue is a national strategic issue, leading this research to aim at providing guidelines that can help the regional government to formulate operational policies and strategies for the quality improvement of financial statement and performance of the regional government.\n","PeriodicalId":123016,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Excellence in Government","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Excellence in Government","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEG-09-2018-0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to re-test the determinant factors of the quality of financial statements and performance of the government by adding contextual factors, such as the personal factor, system/administrative factor and political factor, that may affect the quality of financial statement information and performance of the government. The personal factor is proxied to the competencies that affect the quality of financial statements and performance. The social administrative factor is proxied on the regulations and presentation of quality financial statements. Design/methodology/approach The analysis unit in this study was conducted at the organizational level. The research object was in the South Sulawesi Province. This was a descriptive and verificative research with a survey technique. Based on the objectives of the research, this is an explanatory study. The research method used was an explanatory survey with a quantitative approach. The population of this research was proxied to the Regional Unit Organization (Organisasi Perangkat Desa/OPD) which compiled the financial statements in the South Sulawesi Provincial Government and consisted of 803 units of local government agencies (Satuan Kerja Perangkat Daerah or SKPD). The purposive sampling technique was chosen under the following criteria: the regional government whose financial statement has been audited by the BPK, the regional government whose financial accountability report has been evaluated by Indonesia’s Agency for Financial, and Development Supervision (Badan Pengawasan Keuangan dan Pembangunan or BPKP). In line with the criteria mentioned above, the minimum samples required for 26 observations/indicators are 5 × 26 = 130 respondents. The sample size met the minimum sample requirement of five for each group (cell) (Hair et al., 2006, p. 112). Findings The personal factor “competence” affects the financial statements’ quality. The high personal factor “competence” will affect the high financial statements’ quality. The system/administration factor “regulation” affects the financial statement quality. The high system/administration factor “regulation” will affect the high financial statements’ quality. Political factors affect the financial statements’ quality. The high political factors will affect the high financial statements’ quality. The personal factor “competence” has no direct effect on the performance. The high personal factor “competence” will not affect the high or low of the performance. However, there is a significant indirect effect between the personal factor “competence” on performance through the financial statements’ quality, which means that the higher personal factor “competence” will lead to higher performance through financial statements’ quality. The system/administration factor “regulation” does not directly affect the performance. The high system/administration factor “regulation” will not affect the high or low of the performance. However there is a significant indirect effect between the system/administration factor “regulation” on performance through the financial statements’ quality which means that higher system/administration factor “regulation” will lead to higher performance through financial statements’ quality. The political factor does not directly affect the performance. The high political factors will not affect the high or low of the performance. However there is a significant indirect effect between political factors on performance through the financial statements’ quality which means that the higher political factor will lead to higher performance through the financial statements’ quality. Financial statements’ quality affects the performance. The high financial statements will affect the performance. Originality/value The research issues raised are the increasing public demands for the government services and accountability, while on the other hand, the government is faced with the report and financial quality that are below the expectation. This issue is a national strategic issue, leading this research to aim at providing guidelines that can help the regional government to formulate operational policies and strategies for the quality improvement of financial statement and performance of the regional government.
发展良好的治理模式以改善绩效
本文的目的是通过加入可能影响财务报表信息质量和政府绩效的情境因素,如个人因素、制度/行政因素和政治因素,重新检验财务报表质量和政府绩效的决定因素。个人因素代表了影响财务报表质量和业绩的能力。社会行政因素是影响财务报表质量的主要因素。设计/方法/方法本研究中的分析单元是在组织层面进行的。研究对象位于南苏拉威西省。这是一个描述性和验证性的研究与调查技术。基于研究的目的,这是一项解释性研究。本研究采用的研究方法是定量的解释性调查。本研究的人口被委托给区域单位组织(Organisasi Perangkat Desa/OPD),该组织在南苏拉威西省政府编制财务报表,由地方政府机构(Satuan Kerja Perangkat Daerah或SKPD)的803个单位组成。有目的的抽样技术是根据以下标准选择的:地区政府的财务报表已由印度尼西亚金融和发展监督局(Badan Pengawasan Keuangan dan Pembangunan或BPKP)进行审计,地区政府的财务问责报告已由印度尼西亚金融和发展监督局(Badan Pengawasan Keuangan dan Pembangunan或BPKP)评估。根据上述标准,26项观察/指标所需的最小样本为5 × 26 = 130名受访者。样本量满足每组(细胞)五个样本的最低要求(Hair et al., 2006, p. 112)。发现个人因素“胜任力”影响财务报表质量。高个人因素“胜任力”会影响高财务报表质量。制度/行政因素“监管”影响财务报表质量。高制度/行政因素的“监管”将影响高财务报表质量。政治因素影响财务报表的质量。高度的政治因素会影响高质量的财务报表。个人因素“胜任力”对绩效没有直接影响。个人因素“胜任力”的高低并不影响绩效的高低。然而,个人因素“胜任力”通过财务报表质量对业绩存在显著的间接影响,即个人因素“胜任力”越高,通过财务报表质量产生的业绩越高。制度/管理因素“规范”并不直接影响绩效。高制度/行政因素的“监管”不会影响绩效的高低。然而,制度/行政因素“监管”通过财务报表质量对绩效存在显著的间接影响,这意味着更高的制度/行政因素“监管”将通过财务报表质量导致更高的绩效。政治因素并不直接影响业绩。政治因素的高低不会影响业绩的高低。然而,政治因素通过财务报表质量对业绩存在显著的间接影响,即政治因素越高,财务报表质量对业绩的影响越高。财务报表的质量影响着企业的业绩。过高的财务报表会影响业绩。本研究提出的问题一方面是公众对政府服务和问责的需求日益增加,另一方面是政府面临的报告和财务质量低于预期的问题。这个问题是一个国家战略问题,因此本研究旨在为区域政府制定运营政策和战略提供指导,以提高区域政府财务报表和绩效的质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信