Independence, Regulatory Competences and the Accountability of National Regulatory

S. Lavrijssen
{"title":"Independence, Regulatory Competences and the Accountability of National Regulatory","authors":"S. Lavrijssen","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3285747","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"National regulatory authorities (NRAs) play a key role in supervising and regulating competition in the energy markets and for realizing the transition to a low carbon energy system in the European Energy Union. They have to ensure that energy (service) markets can develop and that consumers can reap the benefits by having a real choice between competing alternatives for renewable energy supply and/or demand response contracts. Current European provisions require that NRAs should be sufficiently independent from politics and from market parties to ensure that they can exercise their powers in a consistent and effective way. Also, the discretionary (regulatory) powers of the NRAs– including establishing tariffs and the conditions for access to energy systems – have been greatly expanded and will continue to expand after the adoption of the Clean Energy Package. Furthermore, EU law has strengthened and institutionalized the former rather informal cooperation between the national authorities by establishing an European agency, namely, the Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators. However, recent reports show that Member States are reluctant to grant adequate discretionary powers and independence to NRAs. This reluctance can be traced back to the fundamental question; to what extent are the European independence requirements consistent with national constitutional principles, such as the democracy principle and the principle of legality? In the Netherlands, for example, these principles tend to be interpreted in a strict way preventing the delegation of broad discretionary powers to independent authorities. This contribution argues that the European development of the creation of independent NRAs with discretionary powers may be reconciled with the interpretation of national constitutional principles, provided that the exercise of powers is subjected to adequate European and national checks and balances. By looking at other sectors, such as the supervision of the General Data Protection Regulation, some suggestions are provided as to how these checks and balances may develop to ensure an effective and impartial functioning of national energy regulatory authorities in the Energy Union.","PeriodicalId":388507,"journal":{"name":"Energy Law & Policy eJournal","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Law & Policy eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3285747","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

National regulatory authorities (NRAs) play a key role in supervising and regulating competition in the energy markets and for realizing the transition to a low carbon energy system in the European Energy Union. They have to ensure that energy (service) markets can develop and that consumers can reap the benefits by having a real choice between competing alternatives for renewable energy supply and/or demand response contracts. Current European provisions require that NRAs should be sufficiently independent from politics and from market parties to ensure that they can exercise their powers in a consistent and effective way. Also, the discretionary (regulatory) powers of the NRAs– including establishing tariffs and the conditions for access to energy systems – have been greatly expanded and will continue to expand after the adoption of the Clean Energy Package. Furthermore, EU law has strengthened and institutionalized the former rather informal cooperation between the national authorities by establishing an European agency, namely, the Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators. However, recent reports show that Member States are reluctant to grant adequate discretionary powers and independence to NRAs. This reluctance can be traced back to the fundamental question; to what extent are the European independence requirements consistent with national constitutional principles, such as the democracy principle and the principle of legality? In the Netherlands, for example, these principles tend to be interpreted in a strict way preventing the delegation of broad discretionary powers to independent authorities. This contribution argues that the European development of the creation of independent NRAs with discretionary powers may be reconciled with the interpretation of national constitutional principles, provided that the exercise of powers is subjected to adequate European and national checks and balances. By looking at other sectors, such as the supervision of the General Data Protection Regulation, some suggestions are provided as to how these checks and balances may develop to ensure an effective and impartial functioning of national energy regulatory authorities in the Energy Union.
国家监管机构的独立性、监管能力和问责制
国家监管机构(NRAs)在监督和规范能源市场竞争以及实现欧洲能源联盟向低碳能源体系转型方面发挥着关键作用。他们必须确保能源(服务)市场能够发展,消费者能够通过在可再生能源供应和/或需求响应合同的竞争替代方案之间进行真正的选择而获益。目前的欧洲条款要求,国家评级机构应充分独立于政治和市场政党,以确保它们能够以一致和有效的方式行使权力。此外,国家能源管理局的自由裁量权(监管权)——包括制定关税和进入能源系统的条件——已经大大扩大,并将在《清洁能源一揽子计划》通过后继续扩大。此外,欧盟法律通过设立一个欧洲机构,即能源监管机构合作机构,加强了国家当局之间以前相当非正式的合作并使之制度化。然而,最近的报告显示,会员国不愿意给予国家自治机构足够的自由裁量权和独立性。这种不情愿可以追溯到一个基本问题;欧洲独立要求在多大程度上符合国家宪法原则,如民主原则和合法性原则?例如,在荷兰,往往以严格的方式解释这些原则,以防止将广泛的自由裁量权委托给独立当局。这篇文章认为,欧洲建立具有自由裁量权的独立国家注册机构的发展可能与对国家宪法原则的解释相协调,前提是权力的行使受到充分的欧洲和国家制衡。通过观察其他部门,例如《通用数据保护条例》的监督,就如何发展这些制衡,以确保能源联盟中国家能源监管机构的有效和公正运作,提出了一些建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信