People’s definition and escape from poverty trap

Maham Fatima, R. Khan
{"title":"People’s definition and escape from poverty trap","authors":"Maham Fatima, R. Khan","doi":"10.1453/JEPE.V5I2.1641","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. The traditional methods of poverty measurement include material or objective indicators such as income, expenditure, calorie intake, education or living standards. However, this study is aimed to identify whether people perceive poverty through these factors or not. The definitions of poverty given by study respondents have proven that although, poverty can be defined through objective indicators but its scope is not limited to them rather it includes various other indicators including no children or parents, lack of self-efforts, person’s laziness, sense of understanding things and mental stress. Through interviewing household heads, some coping strategies have been identified which are employed during economically difficult events. Apart from increasing income sources and reducing expenditure, the coping strategies also include living in joint family system, social networking and borrowing in form of general provident fund as the selected sample was from government sector, they utilize their funds at times of need which give rise to a self-perpetuating poverty. The people’s perceptions related to poverty determine the nature and extent to which society is encountering hardships and prevalence of poverty in it. Keywords. Poverty, Perceptions, Coping strategies. JEL. I32.","PeriodicalId":432468,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Economics and Political Economy","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Economics and Political Economy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1453/JEPE.V5I2.1641","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract. The traditional methods of poverty measurement include material or objective indicators such as income, expenditure, calorie intake, education or living standards. However, this study is aimed to identify whether people perceive poverty through these factors or not. The definitions of poverty given by study respondents have proven that although, poverty can be defined through objective indicators but its scope is not limited to them rather it includes various other indicators including no children or parents, lack of self-efforts, person’s laziness, sense of understanding things and mental stress. Through interviewing household heads, some coping strategies have been identified which are employed during economically difficult events. Apart from increasing income sources and reducing expenditure, the coping strategies also include living in joint family system, social networking and borrowing in form of general provident fund as the selected sample was from government sector, they utilize their funds at times of need which give rise to a self-perpetuating poverty. The people’s perceptions related to poverty determine the nature and extent to which society is encountering hardships and prevalence of poverty in it. Keywords. Poverty, Perceptions, Coping strategies. JEL. I32.
人们对贫困的定义与摆脱贫困陷阱
摘要衡量贫穷的传统方法包括物质或客观指标,如收入、支出、卡路里摄入量、教育或生活水平。然而,本研究的目的是确定人们是否通过这些因素来感知贫困。调查对象对贫困的定义证明,虽然可以通过客观指标来定义贫困,但贫困的范围并不局限于这些指标,而是包括无子女、无父母、缺乏自我努力、人的懒惰、对事物的理解和精神压力等各种其他指标。通过采访户主,确定了在经济困难事件中使用的一些应对策略。除了增加收入来源和减少开支外,应对策略还包括生活在联合家庭制度中,社交网络和以一般公积金的形式借款,因为所选样本来自政府部门,他们在需要时使用他们的资金,这导致了自我延续的贫困。人们对贫困的看法决定了社会遇到困难的性质和程度以及贫困的普遍程度。关键词。贫穷,认知,应对策略。冻胶。手机等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信