The Rule of the Road, 1919-1986: A Case Study of Standards Change

Ian Watson
{"title":"The Rule of the Road, 1919-1986: A Case Study of Standards Change","authors":"Ian Watson","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2533026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 1919, 104 of the world’s territories drove on the left and 104 on the right. Between 1919 and 1986, 34 of the keep-left territories changed to keep-right. No territories shifted in the opposite direction. This paper tests and largely sustains the counterintuitive hypothesis that the reason all changes were in one direction was less that there was any difference between keep-left and keep-right as rules, and more that the geographical position of many keep-left territories happened to put them under pressure to change from keep-right neighbors. This paper also discusses six other potential explanations of change, most of which played some role as well. Finally, it shows that the rule of the road is an example of standardization and convention. The explanations of change proposed for the rule of the road are familiar from many other cases of standardization.","PeriodicalId":329264,"journal":{"name":"AARN: Other Cultural Anthropology (Topic)","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AARN: Other Cultural Anthropology (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2533026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In 1919, 104 of the world’s territories drove on the left and 104 on the right. Between 1919 and 1986, 34 of the keep-left territories changed to keep-right. No territories shifted in the opposite direction. This paper tests and largely sustains the counterintuitive hypothesis that the reason all changes were in one direction was less that there was any difference between keep-left and keep-right as rules, and more that the geographical position of many keep-left territories happened to put them under pressure to change from keep-right neighbors. This paper also discusses six other potential explanations of change, most of which played some role as well. Finally, it shows that the rule of the road is an example of standardization and convention. The explanations of change proposed for the rule of the road are familiar from many other cases of standardization.
道路规则,1919-1986:标准变化的案例研究
1919年,世界上有104个国家靠左行驶,104个靠右行驶。在1919年至1986年间,34个左倾领土改为右倾领土。没有领土向相反方向移动。本文检验并在很大程度上支持了一个反直觉的假设,即所有变化都在一个方向上的原因,与其说是左倾和右倾在规则上存在任何差异,不如说是许多左倾地区的地理位置恰好使它们受到来自邻邦的压力而做出改变。本文还讨论了其他六种可能的变化解释,其中大多数也发挥了一定的作用。最后,它表明道路规则是标准化和约定俗成的一个例子。对于道路规则提出的变化的解释,在许多其他标准化案例中都很常见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信