Comparison of Ray-Tracing and Reverse Monte-Carlo Methods: Application to GEO orbit

R. Benacquista, P. Pourrouquet, A. Varotsou, R. Mangeret, Catherine Barillot, G. Santin, Hugh Evans
{"title":"Comparison of Ray-Tracing and Reverse Monte-Carlo Methods: Application to GEO orbit","authors":"R. Benacquista, P. Pourrouquet, A. Varotsou, R. Mangeret, Catherine Barillot, G. Santin, Hugh Evans","doi":"10.1109/radecs47380.2019.9745642","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ray-Tracing and Reverse Monte-Carlo are the two most widely used methods to estimate the dose at component level for space applications. The Ray-Tracing method is fast but presents intrinsic limitations while the Reverse Monte-Carlo method is more precise but more time consuming. In the frame of the ESA GTREFF project, a statistical comparison between these two methods has been performed, based on realistic satellite models for GEO orbit and using FASTRAD®. Results are presented and analyzed.","PeriodicalId":269018,"journal":{"name":"2019 19th European Conference on Radiation and Its Effects on Components and Systems (RADECS)","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 19th European Conference on Radiation and Its Effects on Components and Systems (RADECS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/radecs47380.2019.9745642","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ray-Tracing and Reverse Monte-Carlo are the two most widely used methods to estimate the dose at component level for space applications. The Ray-Tracing method is fast but presents intrinsic limitations while the Reverse Monte-Carlo method is more precise but more time consuming. In the frame of the ESA GTREFF project, a statistical comparison between these two methods has been performed, based on realistic satellite models for GEO orbit and using FASTRAD®. Results are presented and analyzed.
光线追踪与反向蒙特卡罗方法的比较:在GEO轨道上的应用
射线追踪和反向蒙特卡罗是空间应用中最广泛使用的两种估算分量水平剂量的方法。光线追踪法速度快,但存在固有的局限性,而反向蒙特卡罗法精度高,但耗时长。在ESA GTREFF项目的框架下,基于GEO轨道的实际卫星模型并使用FASTRAD®,对这两种方法进行了统计比较。给出了结果并进行了分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信