Culture and the Evolution of the Human Social Instincts

R. Boyd, P. Richerson
{"title":"Culture and the Evolution of the Human Social Instincts","authors":"R. Boyd, P. Richerson","doi":"10.4324/9781003135517-23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Human societies are extraordinarily cooperative compared to those of most other animals. In the vast majority of species, individuals live solitary lives, meeting to only to mate and, sometimes, raise their young. In social species, cooperation is limited to relatives and (maybe) small groups of reciprocators. After a brief period of maternal support, individuals acquire virtually all of the food that they eat. There is little division of labor, no trade, and no large scale conflict. Communication is limited to a small repertoire of self-verifying signals. No one cares for the sick, or feeds the hungry or disabled. The strong take from the weak without fear of sanctions by third parties. Amend Hobbes to account for nepotism, and his picture of the state of nature is not so far off for most other animals. In contrast, people in even the simplest human societies regularly cooperate with many unrelated individuals. Human language allows low-cost honest communication of virtually unlimited complexity. The sick are cared for, and sharing leads to substantial flows of food from the middle aged to the young and old. Division of labor and trade are prominent features of every historically known human society, and archaeology indicates that they have a long history. Violent conflict among sizable groups is common. In every human society, social life is regulated by commonly held moral systems that specify the rights and duties of individuals enforced, albeit imperfectly, by third party sanctions.","PeriodicalId":174961,"journal":{"name":"Roots of Human Sociality","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"19","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Roots of Human Sociality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003135517-23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

Abstract

Human societies are extraordinarily cooperative compared to those of most other animals. In the vast majority of species, individuals live solitary lives, meeting to only to mate and, sometimes, raise their young. In social species, cooperation is limited to relatives and (maybe) small groups of reciprocators. After a brief period of maternal support, individuals acquire virtually all of the food that they eat. There is little division of labor, no trade, and no large scale conflict. Communication is limited to a small repertoire of self-verifying signals. No one cares for the sick, or feeds the hungry or disabled. The strong take from the weak without fear of sanctions by third parties. Amend Hobbes to account for nepotism, and his picture of the state of nature is not so far off for most other animals. In contrast, people in even the simplest human societies regularly cooperate with many unrelated individuals. Human language allows low-cost honest communication of virtually unlimited complexity. The sick are cared for, and sharing leads to substantial flows of food from the middle aged to the young and old. Division of labor and trade are prominent features of every historically known human society, and archaeology indicates that they have a long history. Violent conflict among sizable groups is common. In every human society, social life is regulated by commonly held moral systems that specify the rights and duties of individuals enforced, albeit imperfectly, by third party sanctions.
文化与人类社会本能的进化
与大多数其他动物相比,人类社会是非常合作的。在绝大多数物种中,个体过着孤独的生活,聚会只是为了交配,有时抚养后代。在群居物种中,合作仅限于亲属和(可能)小群体的互惠者。经过一段短暂的母性支持后,个体几乎获得了它们所吃的所有食物。几乎没有劳动分工,没有贸易,也没有大规模的冲突。通信仅限于一小部分自验证信号。没有人关心病人,没有人喂饱饥饿的人和残疾人。强者取弱者之利,不必担心第三方的制裁。修正霍布斯,以解释裙带关系,他对自然状态的描述与大多数其他动物并没有太大差别。相比之下,即使是在最简单的人类社会中,人们也经常与许多不相关的个体合作。人类语言允许低成本的诚实交流,其复杂性几乎是无限的。病人得到照顾,分享食物会使食物从中年人流向年轻人和老年人。劳动分工和贸易是每一个历史上已知的人类社会的突出特征,考古学表明它们有着悠久的历史。规模较大的群体之间的暴力冲突很常见。在每一个人类社会中,社会生活都是由共同持有的道德体系来规范的,这些道德体系规定了个人的权利和义务,并由第三方制裁来执行,尽管并不完美。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信