The Burning Core: Using Heraclitus’s Concept of an Arche of Fire to Examine Humanity’s Connection with Nature in Cormac McCarthy’s The Road

Jasmin Kirkbride
{"title":"The Burning Core: Using Heraclitus’s Concept of an Arche of Fire to Examine Humanity’s Connection with Nature in Cormac McCarthy’s The Road","authors":"Jasmin Kirkbride","doi":"10.5325/cormmccaj.18.2.0100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"abstract:Treating Cormac McCarthy’s The Road as an ecocritical work, this article uses Heraclitus’s arche of fire as a new methodological lens through which to examine the text. In particular, it asks how readers can derive hope from such a materialistically bleak novel. Heraclitus was a Presocratic philosopher from fifth century BCE Greece. He was a material monist, who claimed that fire was the principle element of the universe, or arche: the preserving and destroying element from which the cosmos came, to which it will return, and by which it will be judged. This principality of fire is reflected in the supra-religious moralistic metaphor that “good guys” in The Road “carry the fire.” This interpretation challenges Daniel Luttrell’s claim that fire in The Road aligns to the Promethean myth, demonstrating that Heraclitus’s arche of fire may offer a more holistic interpretation of the metaphor, particularly when combined with Marcel D. DeCoste, Matthew Mullins, and Erik J. Wielenberg’s theories of community as morality within The Road. Fire is shown to represent the intrinsic, ambiguous interconnectedness of humankind—and that the defining moral choice of The Road’s inhabitants is simply whether they acknowledge it, both in terms of the community of humanity, and humanity’s communion with nature.","PeriodicalId":126318,"journal":{"name":"The Cormac McCarthy Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Cormac McCarthy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/cormmccaj.18.2.0100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

abstract:Treating Cormac McCarthy’s The Road as an ecocritical work, this article uses Heraclitus’s arche of fire as a new methodological lens through which to examine the text. In particular, it asks how readers can derive hope from such a materialistically bleak novel. Heraclitus was a Presocratic philosopher from fifth century BCE Greece. He was a material monist, who claimed that fire was the principle element of the universe, or arche: the preserving and destroying element from which the cosmos came, to which it will return, and by which it will be judged. This principality of fire is reflected in the supra-religious moralistic metaphor that “good guys” in The Road “carry the fire.” This interpretation challenges Daniel Luttrell’s claim that fire in The Road aligns to the Promethean myth, demonstrating that Heraclitus’s arche of fire may offer a more holistic interpretation of the metaphor, particularly when combined with Marcel D. DeCoste, Matthew Mullins, and Erik J. Wielenberg’s theories of community as morality within The Road. Fire is shown to represent the intrinsic, ambiguous interconnectedness of humankind—and that the defining moral choice of The Road’s inhabitants is simply whether they acknowledge it, both in terms of the community of humanity, and humanity’s communion with nature.
燃烧的核心:用赫拉克利特的火焰拱门的概念来考察科马克·麦卡锡的《道路》中人类与自然的联系
本文将科马克·麦卡锡的《道路》作为一部生态批评作品,以赫拉克利特的《火的拱门》作为一种新的方法论视角来考察文本。特别是,它询问读者如何从这样一部物质主义的凄凉小说中获得希望。赫拉克利特是公元前5世纪希腊前苏格拉底时期的哲学家。他是一个物质一元论者,他声称火是宇宙的主要元素,或arche:保存和破坏的元素,宇宙来自它,它将返回,并通过它来判断。这种火的公国体现在《路》中“好人扛火”的超宗教道德隐喻中。这一解释挑战了Daniel Luttrell关于《道路》中的火与普罗米修斯神话相一致的说法,表明赫拉克利特的火之门可能提供了一个更全面的隐喻解释,特别是当与Marcel D. DeCoste、Matthew Mullins和Erik J. Wielenberg的《道路》中的社区道德理论相结合时。“火”代表了人类内在的、模糊的相互联系,而“路”居民的道德选择仅仅是他们是否承认这一点,无论是在人类的社区,还是在人类与自然的交流方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信