‘Genuine attempts at enlarging the scope of film’

B. Hoyle
{"title":"‘Genuine attempts at enlarging the scope of film’","authors":"B. Hoyle","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190945145.013.39","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although they collaborated fully on only three feature films, the partnership of Sir Laurence Olivier and Sir William Walton remains one of the great filmmaker‒composer partnerships, one which bears comparison with the teaming of Alfred Hitchcock and Bernard Herrmann, or Federico Fellini and Nino Rota. The chapter draws on primary source materials in both the Walton archive at Yale University and the Olivier papers at the British Library in order to undertake a close reading of the scores for Henry V (1945), Hamlet (1948),and Richard III (1955) and assesses the ways in which Walton’s music complements and counterpoints both Shakespeare’s texts and Olivier’s editing, acting, and mise-en-scène. Comparisons are drawn between Walton’s film scoring practices and those of such prominent contemporaries as Sergei Prokofiev and Max Steiner, as well as more recent film composers such as Patrick Doyle. The chapter also situates the scores within the wider context of 1940s and 1950s British film and film music, and confirms filmmaker Michael Powell’s assertion that this trilogy represented a genuine attempt to enlarge the scope of film as an art form through its complex combination of words, music, cinematography, and design.","PeriodicalId":166828,"journal":{"name":"The Oxford Handbook of Shakespeare and Music","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Oxford Handbook of Shakespeare and Music","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190945145.013.39","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although they collaborated fully on only three feature films, the partnership of Sir Laurence Olivier and Sir William Walton remains one of the great filmmaker‒composer partnerships, one which bears comparison with the teaming of Alfred Hitchcock and Bernard Herrmann, or Federico Fellini and Nino Rota. The chapter draws on primary source materials in both the Walton archive at Yale University and the Olivier papers at the British Library in order to undertake a close reading of the scores for Henry V (1945), Hamlet (1948),and Richard III (1955) and assesses the ways in which Walton’s music complements and counterpoints both Shakespeare’s texts and Olivier’s editing, acting, and mise-en-scène. Comparisons are drawn between Walton’s film scoring practices and those of such prominent contemporaries as Sergei Prokofiev and Max Steiner, as well as more recent film composers such as Patrick Doyle. The chapter also situates the scores within the wider context of 1940s and 1950s British film and film music, and confirms filmmaker Michael Powell’s assertion that this trilogy represented a genuine attempt to enlarge the scope of film as an art form through its complex combination of words, music, cinematography, and design.
“真正尝试扩大电影的范围”
虽然劳伦斯·奥利维尔爵士和威廉·沃尔顿爵士只合作了三部故事片,但他们的合作仍然是最伟大的电影制作人-作曲家合作之一,可以与阿尔弗雷德·希区柯克和伯纳德·赫尔曼的合作或费德里科·费里尼和尼诺·罗塔的合作相提并论。本章借鉴了耶鲁大学沃尔顿档案和大英图书馆奥利维尔论文中的主要原始材料,以便对亨利五世(1945年),哈姆雷特(1948年)和理查三世(1955年)的乐谱进行仔细阅读,并评估沃尔顿的音乐补充和对位莎士比亚文本和奥利维尔的编辑,表演和场景布置的方式。沃尔顿的电影配乐实践与谢尔盖·普罗科菲耶夫和马克斯·施泰纳等同时代的杰出作曲家,以及帕特里克·多伊尔等更近代的电影作曲家进行了比较。本章还将乐谱置于20世纪40年代和50年代英国电影和电影音乐的更大背景下,并证实了电影制作人迈克尔·鲍威尔的断言,即这部三部曲代表了通过将文字、音乐、摄影和设计的复杂组合来扩大电影作为一种艺术形式的范围的真正尝试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信