Tales of a Tool Encounter: Exploring Video Annotation for Doing Media History

Susanna Aasman, Liliana Melgar Estrada, T. Slootweg, Rob Wegter
{"title":"Tales of a Tool Encounter: Exploring Video Annotation for Doing Media History","authors":"Susanna Aasman, Liliana Melgar Estrada, T. Slootweg, Rob Wegter","doi":"10.18146/213-0969.2018.jethc154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article explores the affordances and functionalities of the Dutch CLARIAH research infrastructure – and the integrated video annotation tool – for doing media historical research with digitised audiovisual sources from television archives. The growing importance of digital research infrastructures, archives and tools, has enticed media historians to rethink their research practices more and more in terms of methodological transparency, tool criticism and reflection. Moreover, also questions related to the heuristics and hermeneutics of our scholarly work need to be reconsidered. The article hence sketches the role of digital research infrastructures for the humanities (in the Netherlands), and the use of video annotation in media studies and other research domains. By doing so, the authors reflect on their own specific engagements with the CLARIAH infrastructure and its tools, both as media historians and co-developers. This dual position greatly determines the possibilities and constraints for the various modes of digital scholarship relevant to media history. To exemplify this, two short case studies – based on a pilot project ‘Me and Myself. Tracing First Person in Documentary History in AV-Collections’ (M&M) – show how the authors deployed video annotation to segment interpretative units of interest, rather than opting for units of analysis common in statistical analysis. The deliberate choice to abandon formal modes of moving image annotation and analysis ensued from a delicate interplay between the desired interpretative research goals, and the integration of tool criticism and reflection in the research design. The authors found that due to the formal and stylistic complexity of documentaries, also alternative, hermeneutic research strategies ought to be supported by digital infrastructures and its tools.","PeriodicalId":115199,"journal":{"name":"VIEW Journal of European Television History and Culture","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"VIEW Journal of European Television History and Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18146/213-0969.2018.jethc154","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article explores the affordances and functionalities of the Dutch CLARIAH research infrastructure – and the integrated video annotation tool – for doing media historical research with digitised audiovisual sources from television archives. The growing importance of digital research infrastructures, archives and tools, has enticed media historians to rethink their research practices more and more in terms of methodological transparency, tool criticism and reflection. Moreover, also questions related to the heuristics and hermeneutics of our scholarly work need to be reconsidered. The article hence sketches the role of digital research infrastructures for the humanities (in the Netherlands), and the use of video annotation in media studies and other research domains. By doing so, the authors reflect on their own specific engagements with the CLARIAH infrastructure and its tools, both as media historians and co-developers. This dual position greatly determines the possibilities and constraints for the various modes of digital scholarship relevant to media history. To exemplify this, two short case studies – based on a pilot project ‘Me and Myself. Tracing First Person in Documentary History in AV-Collections’ (M&M) – show how the authors deployed video annotation to segment interpretative units of interest, rather than opting for units of analysis common in statistical analysis. The deliberate choice to abandon formal modes of moving image annotation and analysis ensued from a delicate interplay between the desired interpretative research goals, and the integration of tool criticism and reflection in the research design. The authors found that due to the formal and stylistic complexity of documentaries, also alternative, hermeneutic research strategies ought to be supported by digital infrastructures and its tools.
一个工具遭遇的故事:探索视频注释做媒体的历史
本文探讨了荷兰CLARIAH研究基础设施的可视性和功能-以及集成的视频注释工具-用于使用来自电视档案的数字化视听资源进行媒体历史研究。数字研究基础设施、档案和工具的重要性日益增加,吸引了媒体历史学家在方法论透明度、工具批评和反思方面越来越多地重新思考他们的研究实践。此外,与我们的学术工作的启发式和解释学有关的问题也需要重新考虑。因此,本文概述了数字研究基础设施对人文学科的作用(在荷兰),以及视频注释在媒体研究和其他研究领域的使用。通过这样做,作者反思了他们自己作为媒体历史学家和共同开发者与CLARIAH基础设施及其工具的具体接触。这种双重地位极大地决定了与媒体史相关的各种数字学术模式的可能性和局限性。为了说明这一点,两个简短的案例研究——基于一个试点项目“我和我自己”。在AV-Collections (M&M)中追踪纪录片历史中的第一人——展示了作者如何使用视频注释来分割感兴趣的解释单位,而不是选择统计分析中常见的分析单位。刻意选择放弃运动图像注释和分析的形式模式,源于期望的解释性研究目标与研究设计中工具批评和反思的整合之间的微妙相互作用。作者发现,由于纪录片的形式和风格的复杂性,另类的解释性研究策略也应该得到数字基础设施及其工具的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信