Do issues matter? anti-austerity protests' composition, values, and action repertoires compared

M. Grasso, Marco Giugni
{"title":"Do issues matter? anti-austerity protests' composition, values, and action repertoires compared","authors":"M. Grasso, Marco Giugni","doi":"10.1108/S0163-786X20160000039002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An important wave of anti-austerity protests has swept across Western Europe in recent years. We can thus distinguish between three different types of protest occurring in Western Europe recently: “old” issue protests, relating to the trade union and labor movement; “new” issue protests, relating to culture and identity issues; anti-austerity protests, emerging directly in reaction to austerity measures and cuts enacted in the current period. Following previous literature, we hypothesize that anti-austerity protests have attracted a new constituency to the streets and that they will be different from both “old” and “new” protests in terms of their social composition, value orientations, and action repertoires. We expect anti-austerity protesters to be on the whole younger, and in more precarious working conditions, to be more concerned with economic over social issues, but also to be considerably less institutionalized and embedded in organizational networks, and to have fewer experiences of previous extra-institutional participation. We test these hypotheses by analyzing a unique and novel dataset containing data from over 10,000 protestors from 72 demonstrations (2009–2013). Our results lend broad support to our hypotheses with the exception of the idea that “precarity” forms a new social base for anti-austerity protests.","PeriodicalId":314175,"journal":{"name":"Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"24","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/S0163-786X20160000039002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

Abstract

An important wave of anti-austerity protests has swept across Western Europe in recent years. We can thus distinguish between three different types of protest occurring in Western Europe recently: “old” issue protests, relating to the trade union and labor movement; “new” issue protests, relating to culture and identity issues; anti-austerity protests, emerging directly in reaction to austerity measures and cuts enacted in the current period. Following previous literature, we hypothesize that anti-austerity protests have attracted a new constituency to the streets and that they will be different from both “old” and “new” protests in terms of their social composition, value orientations, and action repertoires. We expect anti-austerity protesters to be on the whole younger, and in more precarious working conditions, to be more concerned with economic over social issues, but also to be considerably less institutionalized and embedded in organizational networks, and to have fewer experiences of previous extra-institutional participation. We test these hypotheses by analyzing a unique and novel dataset containing data from over 10,000 protestors from 72 demonstrations (2009–2013). Our results lend broad support to our hypotheses with the exception of the idea that “precarity” forms a new social base for anti-austerity protests.
问题重要吗?反紧缩抗议的组成、价值和行动的比较
近年来,一场重要的反紧缩抗议浪潮席卷了西欧。因此,我们可以区分最近在西欧发生的三种不同类型的抗议:与工会和劳工运动有关的“旧”问题抗议;“新”问题抗议,涉及文化和身份问题;反紧缩的抗议活动,是对当前实施的紧缩措施和削减开支的直接反应。根据先前的文献,我们假设反紧缩抗议活动吸引了新的选民走上街头,并且在社会构成、价值取向和行动手段方面,他们将不同于“旧”和“新”抗议活动。我们预计反紧缩抗议者总体上更年轻,工作条件更不稳定,更关心经济而不是社会问题,但也更少制度化,更少嵌入组织网络,更少以前机构外参与的经验。我们通过分析一个独特而新颖的数据集来检验这些假设,该数据集包含来自72次示威活动(2009-2013)的10,000多名抗议者的数据。我们的研究结果为我们的假设提供了广泛的支持,但“不稳定”形成了反紧缩抗议活动的新社会基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信