Political and legal transformations in the context of the development of technologies and intelligent systems: transhumanistic perspectives

Irina V. Baturina
{"title":"Political and legal transformations in the context of the development of technologies and intelligent systems: transhumanistic perspectives","authors":"Irina V. Baturina","doi":"10.22394/1996-0522-2023-1-51-60","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. Innovationism in various areas of society has changed both the natural and social environment. The change speed in the new infor- mation and communication field is the reason for many questions related to studying the problems of society and the machine, finding out the place of artificial intelligence in social relations. These pro- cesses stimulated the philosophical research, the subject of which was man, modern technologies, scenarios for the development of society, socio- cultural and political-legal forms of its organization. Since the 90s of the twentieth century in the West and later in Russia, a transhumanistic concept has been formed, which connects man, society and technology in a special way. Representatives of transhumanism study the technical develop- ments of human immortality and build models of the perfect man, pursuing as a goal, his deliver- ance from suffering and disease. Transhumanistic perspectives actualize the need for a thorough, constructive and critical assessment of the possible advantages and risks of technological development, and its impact on the political and legal structure. In this regard, the ability to see and isolate the features of this process and subsequent reflection is fundamentally important. The purpose of the article is to consider political and legal transformations in the context of the interaction of modern technologies and soci- ety through the prism of transhumanistic perspec- tives, to identify possible directions of philosophical reflection of political and legal modes of modernity. Methods. To achieve the research goal, general scientific methods of cognition were used: analysis and synthesis, induction, deduction, comparison, abstraction. The article also applied institutional- functional and system-structural approaches, the method of interpretation and content analysis. The analysis of public opinion and special labeling of artificial intelligence was carried out with the help of appealing to network content (social networks, blogs, and forums). Communication channels reproduce messages mentioning modern technolo- gies from the point of view of the philistine world- view based on stereotypes broadcast in society and the influence of popular culture. Content analysis revealed the relevance of the spectrum of labeling, relative to artificial intelligence systems, includ- ing the verbs “create”, “destroy”, “help”, “enslave”. Regarding the sphere of labor, law and politics, the positions differ, from outright alarmism to utopian images of social well-being. Scientific novelty of the study. The article analyzes the prospects of considering the phenom- enon of social transformations, the forms of their representation through political and legal views as exemplified by transhumanism. Results. The author attempts to give a comprehen- sive description of social changes in the field of public administration, legal regulation, legal per- sonality and legal responsibility, social equality of participants in legal relations through the specific refraction of these social phenomena in transhu- manistic ideas. The spectrum of the main problems in the sphere of interests of the transhumanistic worldview is listed. Conclusion. Turning to modernization strategies on the example of transhumanism is a natural and necessary need in the political and legal sphere, in particular. In the course of the analysis, a wide range of problems were identified that actualize the social and axiological and anthropological optics of the research. Diverse forms of transhumanistic political trends act as manifestations of socio-legal reflection on the intensification of innovation- ism, which is capable of radically changing human nature.","PeriodicalId":403043,"journal":{"name":"Socium i vlast","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Socium i vlast","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22394/1996-0522-2023-1-51-60","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. Innovationism in various areas of society has changed both the natural and social environment. The change speed in the new infor- mation and communication field is the reason for many questions related to studying the problems of society and the machine, finding out the place of artificial intelligence in social relations. These pro- cesses stimulated the philosophical research, the subject of which was man, modern technologies, scenarios for the development of society, socio- cultural and political-legal forms of its organization. Since the 90s of the twentieth century in the West and later in Russia, a transhumanistic concept has been formed, which connects man, society and technology in a special way. Representatives of transhumanism study the technical develop- ments of human immortality and build models of the perfect man, pursuing as a goal, his deliver- ance from suffering and disease. Transhumanistic perspectives actualize the need for a thorough, constructive and critical assessment of the possible advantages and risks of technological development, and its impact on the political and legal structure. In this regard, the ability to see and isolate the features of this process and subsequent reflection is fundamentally important. The purpose of the article is to consider political and legal transformations in the context of the interaction of modern technologies and soci- ety through the prism of transhumanistic perspec- tives, to identify possible directions of philosophical reflection of political and legal modes of modernity. Methods. To achieve the research goal, general scientific methods of cognition were used: analysis and synthesis, induction, deduction, comparison, abstraction. The article also applied institutional- functional and system-structural approaches, the method of interpretation and content analysis. The analysis of public opinion and special labeling of artificial intelligence was carried out with the help of appealing to network content (social networks, blogs, and forums). Communication channels reproduce messages mentioning modern technolo- gies from the point of view of the philistine world- view based on stereotypes broadcast in society and the influence of popular culture. Content analysis revealed the relevance of the spectrum of labeling, relative to artificial intelligence systems, includ- ing the verbs “create”, “destroy”, “help”, “enslave”. Regarding the sphere of labor, law and politics, the positions differ, from outright alarmism to utopian images of social well-being. Scientific novelty of the study. The article analyzes the prospects of considering the phenom- enon of social transformations, the forms of their representation through political and legal views as exemplified by transhumanism. Results. The author attempts to give a comprehen- sive description of social changes in the field of public administration, legal regulation, legal per- sonality and legal responsibility, social equality of participants in legal relations through the specific refraction of these social phenomena in transhu- manistic ideas. The spectrum of the main problems in the sphere of interests of the transhumanistic worldview is listed. Conclusion. Turning to modernization strategies on the example of transhumanism is a natural and necessary need in the political and legal sphere, in particular. In the course of the analysis, a wide range of problems were identified that actualize the social and axiological and anthropological optics of the research. Diverse forms of transhumanistic political trends act as manifestations of socio-legal reflection on the intensification of innovation- ism, which is capable of radically changing human nature.
技术和智能系统发展背景下的政治和法律变革:超人类主义视角
介绍。社会各个领域的创新已经改变了自然环境和社会环境。新的信息和通信领域的变化速度是研究社会和机器问题,找出人工智能在社会关系中的地位的许多问题的原因。这些过程刺激了哲学研究,其主题是人、现代技术、社会发展的情景、社会文化和组织的政治-法律形式。自20世纪90年代以来,西方和后来的俄罗斯形成了一种超人类主义的概念,它以一种特殊的方式将人、社会和技术联系起来。超人类主义的代表研究人类不朽的技术发展,建立完美的人的模型,以追求从痛苦和疾病中解脱出来为目标。超人类主义的观点实现了对技术发展可能带来的优势和风险及其对政治和法律结构的影响进行全面、建设性和批判性评估的需求。在这方面,能够看到和分离这一过程的特征以及随后的反思是非常重要的。本文的目的是通过超人类主义的视角,在现代技术与社会相互作用的背景下考虑政治和法律的变革,以确定现代性政治和法律模式的哲学反思的可能方向。方法。为了达到研究目的,采用了一般的科学认知方法:分析综合、归纳、演绎、比较、抽象。本文还运用了制度功能理论和制度结构理论、阐释方法和内容分析方法。借助网络内容(社交网络、博客、论坛)进行舆论分析和人工智能专项标签。在大众文化的影响下,传播渠道以社会上传播的刻板印象为基础,从市侩世界观的角度来再现涉及现代技术的信息。内容分析揭示了与人工智能系统相关的标签频谱,包括动词“创造”、“破坏”、“帮助”、“奴役”。关于劳工、法律和政治领域,立场不同,从彻底的危言耸听到乌托邦式的社会福利形象。科学新颖的研究。本文分析了以超人类主义为代表的政治和法律观点对社会转型现象的思考前景及其表现形式。结果。笔者试图通过对这些社会现象在泛人本主义思想中的具体折射,对公共行政、法律规制、法律人格与法律责任、法律关系参与者的社会平等等领域的社会变迁进行全面的描述。在超人类主义世界观的利益范围内的主要问题的光谱被列出。结论。以超人类主义为例转向现代化战略是一种自然和必要的需要,特别是在政治和法律领域。在分析过程中,发现了一系列广泛的问题,这些问题实现了研究的社会、价值论和人类学光学。各种形式的超人类主义政治思潮是对创新主义强化的社会-法律反思的表现,创新主义能够从根本上改变人性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信