Democratic control over the armed forces in the legal order of the member states of the Council of Europe

J. Robel
{"title":"Democratic control over the armed forces in the legal order of the member states of the Council of Europe","authors":"J. Robel","doi":"10.16926/gea.2021.01.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The control of the military is an indispensable element of a democratic government. Author of the article says that the degree and type of such control will vary considerably according to the system of government, historical traditions and also cultural values. The democratic control over the armed forces has two dimensions, which both enhance and promote confidence – building and peace. The domestic dimension implies the primacy of the civilian general interest of the principles of a democracy over the military. The international dimension prohibits in general the threat or use of force against a State. The democratic control of the armed forces is a complex matter. The author has focused in particular on aspects related to the armed forces: ‘traditional’ issues such as military expenditure or military budget and appointment of top commanders and issues which correspond to the change in the role of the armed forces, both at national and international level. Indeed, since the end of the cold war, armed forces have undeniably undergone a profound shift in both the range and focus of their role. This refocusing of defence and security policy in many Council of Europe member States has led to more national participation in international peace missions. Likewise, the changing nature of the threats posed to national security and in particular the rise of international terrorism has resulted in the re-emergence of an international role of the army in many European states, which requires a specific control of the conditions by which a state uses the army in domestic issues.","PeriodicalId":166701,"journal":{"name":"Gubernaculum et Administratio","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gubernaculum et Administratio","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16926/gea.2021.01.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The control of the military is an indispensable element of a democratic government. Author of the article says that the degree and type of such control will vary considerably according to the system of government, historical traditions and also cultural values. The democratic control over the armed forces has two dimensions, which both enhance and promote confidence – building and peace. The domestic dimension implies the primacy of the civilian general interest of the principles of a democracy over the military. The international dimension prohibits in general the threat or use of force against a State. The democratic control of the armed forces is a complex matter. The author has focused in particular on aspects related to the armed forces: ‘traditional’ issues such as military expenditure or military budget and appointment of top commanders and issues which correspond to the change in the role of the armed forces, both at national and international level. Indeed, since the end of the cold war, armed forces have undeniably undergone a profound shift in both the range and focus of their role. This refocusing of defence and security policy in many Council of Europe member States has led to more national participation in international peace missions. Likewise, the changing nature of the threats posed to national security and in particular the rise of international terrorism has resulted in the re-emergence of an international role of the army in many European states, which requires a specific control of the conditions by which a state uses the army in domestic issues.
在欧洲委员会成员国的法律秩序中对武装力量的民主控制
对军队的控制是民主政府不可缺少的因素。这篇文章的作者说,这种控制的程度和类型将根据政府制度、历史传统和文化价值观而有很大的不同。对武装部队的民主控制有两个方面,这两个方面都能加强和促进建立信任与和平。国内层面意味着民主原则的平民普遍利益高于军队。国际层面一般禁止对一个国家进行武力威胁或使用武力。对武装部队的民主控制是一个复杂的问题。作者特别着重于与武装部队有关的方面:诸如军事开支或军事预算和任命高级指挥官等“传统”问题,以及与武装部队在国家和国际一级的作用变化相对应的问题。的确,自冷战结束以来,武装部队在其作用的范围和重点方面都经历了不可否认的深刻转变。许多欧洲委员会成员国国防和安全政策的这种重新集中已导致更多的国家参与国际和平特派团。同样,对国家安全构成的威胁性质的变化,特别是国际恐怖主义的兴起,导致许多欧洲国家重新出现了军队的国际角色,这需要对一个国家在国内问题上使用军队的条件进行具体控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信