Non Aqueous Foam for Improving Hydrocarbon Miscible Flooding in Water Sensitive Tight Oil Formations

Chao-yu Sie, Q. Nguyen
{"title":"Non Aqueous Foam for Improving Hydrocarbon Miscible Flooding in Water Sensitive Tight Oil Formations","authors":"Chao-yu Sie, Q. Nguyen","doi":"10.2118/196162-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Enhanced oil recovery from tight carbonate formations has been challenging due to its high reservoir heterogeneity, unfavorable wettability to water, and low reservoir permeability which can restrict the application of traditional water-based EOR methods with mobility control (e.g. polymer). With the increasing availability of wet gas due to the rise of shale production over the last decade, we introduce a novel foam EOR utilizing the raw mixture of constituents of Natural Gas Liquids Mixture (NGLM) composed principally of ethane, propane, butane, and natural gasolines. This process involves the injection of NGLM with non-condensable gas (i.e. nitrogen) and non-aqueous foam stabilizing additive (such as surfactant) to simultaneously maximize the displacement efficiency based on its miscible nature and the sweep efficiency due to the mobility control as provided by the NGLM-based foam. The objectives of this study are to (i) investigate the feasibility of this non-aqueous-foam-enhanced miscible hydrocarbon flooding in sub-10-mD carbonate cores, and (ii) evaluate the effect of the non-aqueous foam on miscible displacement.\n The proof-of-concept study of non-aqueous foam assisted miscible displacement were conducted by performing a series of core floods in heterogeneous carbonate cores with sub-10-mD permeability. The effect of foam on oil recovery performance was evaluated based on the ultimate recovery factor and oil recovery rate. The effect of injection strategy (continuous drive injection and alternating injection) on non-aqueous foam propagation and overall recovery were evaluated and compared. The propagation of foam and the mobilization of the unswept oil were monitored based on the measured pressure drops of the core.\n It was found that non-aqueous foam-assisted miscible flooding can achieve promising ultimate recovery factor while significantly reducing the amount of injected NGLM. For the reference case (continuous NGLM injection), an ultimate recovery factor of 87.6% was achieved after 2.06 PV of NGLM injection. High ultimate recovery factor may be attributed to (i) the miscibility between NGLM and oil, and (ii) gravity stabilization (top-down injection). For continuous nitrogen drive (0.33 PV of NGLM slug followed by a nitrogen drive), a low ultimate recovery factor of 47.4% was observed due to the acceleration of the injectant breakthrough as caused by the extremely unfavorable mobility ratio between nitrogen and crude oil. With the non-aqueous foaming agent, the ultimate recovery factor for the continuous nitrogen drive was increased by 15.7%. Comparison between the overall and sectional pressure drops in these two cases indicates that the in-situ generation of non-aqueous foam significantly delayed the injectant breakthrough and recovered the unswept oil in the sections closer to the producer. For alternating injection, the ultimate recovery factor of the case with the foaming agent (87.5%) is 17.8% higher than that without the foaming agent. Most importantly, the ultimate recovery of the foam-enhanced NGLM-alternating-nitrogen is similar to that of the continuous NGLM injection with only 0.83 PV of NGLM consumed. Overall pressure drops in two foam-enhanced cases (continuous drive injection and alternating injection) indicate that foam generation and propagation are much stronger in the alternating injection case which leads to the higher ultimate recovery factor and sweep efficiency. This could be attributed to the \"foam dryout\" effect caused by the continuous desaturation of the mobile liquid phase in the case of single liquid slug injection. Lastly, NGLM efficiency (defined as the volume of crude oil recovered divided by the volume of injected NGLM) was calculated to evaluate the commercial vitality of this process.\n This work demonstrates for the first time that non-aqueous-foam-asissted hydrocarbon miscible flooding is technically feasible in sub-10-mD rocks where conventional mobility control options are quite limited. The experimental results show that the ultimate recovery factor of hydrocarbon miscible flooding in low permeability carbonate cores can be significantly improved by non-aqueous foam with lower consumption of NGLM.","PeriodicalId":325107,"journal":{"name":"Day 1 Mon, September 30, 2019","volume":"301 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 1 Mon, September 30, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/196162-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Enhanced oil recovery from tight carbonate formations has been challenging due to its high reservoir heterogeneity, unfavorable wettability to water, and low reservoir permeability which can restrict the application of traditional water-based EOR methods with mobility control (e.g. polymer). With the increasing availability of wet gas due to the rise of shale production over the last decade, we introduce a novel foam EOR utilizing the raw mixture of constituents of Natural Gas Liquids Mixture (NGLM) composed principally of ethane, propane, butane, and natural gasolines. This process involves the injection of NGLM with non-condensable gas (i.e. nitrogen) and non-aqueous foam stabilizing additive (such as surfactant) to simultaneously maximize the displacement efficiency based on its miscible nature and the sweep efficiency due to the mobility control as provided by the NGLM-based foam. The objectives of this study are to (i) investigate the feasibility of this non-aqueous-foam-enhanced miscible hydrocarbon flooding in sub-10-mD carbonate cores, and (ii) evaluate the effect of the non-aqueous foam on miscible displacement. The proof-of-concept study of non-aqueous foam assisted miscible displacement were conducted by performing a series of core floods in heterogeneous carbonate cores with sub-10-mD permeability. The effect of foam on oil recovery performance was evaluated based on the ultimate recovery factor and oil recovery rate. The effect of injection strategy (continuous drive injection and alternating injection) on non-aqueous foam propagation and overall recovery were evaluated and compared. The propagation of foam and the mobilization of the unswept oil were monitored based on the measured pressure drops of the core. It was found that non-aqueous foam-assisted miscible flooding can achieve promising ultimate recovery factor while significantly reducing the amount of injected NGLM. For the reference case (continuous NGLM injection), an ultimate recovery factor of 87.6% was achieved after 2.06 PV of NGLM injection. High ultimate recovery factor may be attributed to (i) the miscibility between NGLM and oil, and (ii) gravity stabilization (top-down injection). For continuous nitrogen drive (0.33 PV of NGLM slug followed by a nitrogen drive), a low ultimate recovery factor of 47.4% was observed due to the acceleration of the injectant breakthrough as caused by the extremely unfavorable mobility ratio between nitrogen and crude oil. With the non-aqueous foaming agent, the ultimate recovery factor for the continuous nitrogen drive was increased by 15.7%. Comparison between the overall and sectional pressure drops in these two cases indicates that the in-situ generation of non-aqueous foam significantly delayed the injectant breakthrough and recovered the unswept oil in the sections closer to the producer. For alternating injection, the ultimate recovery factor of the case with the foaming agent (87.5%) is 17.8% higher than that without the foaming agent. Most importantly, the ultimate recovery of the foam-enhanced NGLM-alternating-nitrogen is similar to that of the continuous NGLM injection with only 0.83 PV of NGLM consumed. Overall pressure drops in two foam-enhanced cases (continuous drive injection and alternating injection) indicate that foam generation and propagation are much stronger in the alternating injection case which leads to the higher ultimate recovery factor and sweep efficiency. This could be attributed to the "foam dryout" effect caused by the continuous desaturation of the mobile liquid phase in the case of single liquid slug injection. Lastly, NGLM efficiency (defined as the volume of crude oil recovered divided by the volume of injected NGLM) was calculated to evaluate the commercial vitality of this process. This work demonstrates for the first time that non-aqueous-foam-asissted hydrocarbon miscible flooding is technically feasible in sub-10-mD rocks where conventional mobility control options are quite limited. The experimental results show that the ultimate recovery factor of hydrocarbon miscible flooding in low permeability carbonate cores can be significantly improved by non-aqueous foam with lower consumption of NGLM.
非水泡沫改善水敏致密油地层烃类混相驱
致密碳酸盐岩储层的非均质性高,对水的润湿性差,储层渗透率低,这些都限制了传统的水基提高采收率方法(如聚合物)的应用,因此提高致密碳酸盐岩储层的采收率一直是一个挑战。在过去的十年里,由于页岩气产量的增加,湿气的可用性越来越高,我们推出了一种新型泡沫EOR,利用天然气液体混合物(NGLM)的原料混合物,主要由乙烷、丙烷、丁烷和天然气汽油组成。该工艺包括向NGLM注入不凝性气体(如氮气)和非水泡沫稳定添加剂(如表面活性剂),同时最大化基于其混相性质的驱油效率和基于NGLM基泡沫提供的流动性控制的波及效率。本研究的目的是:(1)研究在低于10md的碳酸盐岩心中采用非水泡沫增强混相烃驱油的可行性;(2)评估非水泡沫对混相驱油的影响。通过对渗透率低于10- md的非均质碳酸盐岩心进行一系列岩心驱替,进行了非水泡沫辅助混相驱替的概念验证研究。根据最终采收率和原油采收率评价泡沫对采收率的影响。评价和比较了连续驱动和交替注入两种注入策略对非水泡沫扩展和总采收率的影响。通过实测岩心压降,监测了泡沫的扩散和未扫油的运移。研究发现,非水泡沫辅助混相驱在显著减少NGLM注入量的同时,可以获得较好的最终采收率。对于参考案例(连续注入NGLM),注入2.06 PV的NGLM后,最终采收率达到87.6%。高的最终采收率可能归因于(1)NGLM与原油的混溶性,以及(2)重力稳定(自上而下注入)。对于连续氮气驱(0.33 PV的NGLM段塞,然后再进行一次氮气驱),由于氮气与原油之间极不有利的流度比导致注入剂加速突破,最终采收率很低,只有47.4%。使用非水发泡剂后,连续氮气驱的最终采收率提高了15.7%。对比这两种情况下的总压降和分段压降表明,非水泡沫的原位生成显著推迟了注入突破,并在靠近生产者的部分回收了未被波及的石油。交替注射时,加发泡剂组的最终采收率(87.5%)比不加发泡剂组高17.8%。最重要的是,泡沫强化NGLM-交替充氮的最终采收率与连续注入NGLM相似,仅消耗0.83 PV的NGLM。连续驱注和交替驱注两种泡沫增强情况下的总压降表明,交替驱注情况下泡沫的产生和扩展更强,从而获得更高的最终采收率和波及效率。这可能是由于在单次液体段塞注入的情况下,流动液相的持续去饱和造成的“泡沫干化”效应。最后,计算NGLM效率(定义为原油采收率除以注入NGLM的体积),以评估该工艺的商业活力。这项工作首次证明了非水泡沫辅助烃类混相驱技术在10- md以下的岩石中是可行的,常规的运移控制方案非常有限。实验结果表明,低渗透碳酸盐岩岩心采用非水泡沫驱可以显著提高油气混相驱的最终采收率,同时降低NGLM的用量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信