Approaches to the study and development of corporate culture in a healthcare organization

S. Petrikov, K. N. Tsaranov, L. B. Zavaliy, A. G. Tarbastaev, A. Kanibolotsky, B. T. Tsuleiskiry
{"title":"Approaches to the study and development of corporate culture in a healthcare organization","authors":"S. Petrikov, K. N. Tsaranov, L. B. Zavaliy, A. G. Tarbastaev, A. Kanibolotsky, B. T. Tsuleiskiry","doi":"10.21045/1811-0185-2022-10-42-50","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Relevance. The N. V. Sklifosovsky Research Institute for Emergency Medicine is a leading multidisciplinary medical institution with a unique corporate culture. In its established work team, the heads of departments are carriers and indicators of values for the employees. P u r p o s e . To study the values of the heads of departments. M e t h o d s . Anonymous survey among two groups of heads: GrS (scientific departments) and GrC (clinical departments) using the methodology of assessing the value profile (questionnaires: SVS‑57, PVQ‑47) and labor motives (Martin-Ritchie questionnaire). F i n d i n g s . The questionnaires were filled out by 25 heads, of which GrS – 11 people (44%), GrC – 14 (56%). According to the Schwartz questionnaire, in the GrS, “Self-Direction” was in the first place in the value profile rating, “Benevolence” was in the second place, “Security” was in the third, and in the GrC, “Security” was in the first place, “Benevolence” was in the second, “Self-Direction” was in the third. Regression analysis was carried out in the general group: clustering was determined by the indicator “Universalism” (0.13). Its strong correlation with “Security” was revealed (k=0.73, p<0.01). According to the Martin-Ritchie questionnaire, the main motivating factor for people is the feeling of their own relevance in interesting and socially useful activities. In particular, the respondents for whom “Security” is not a priority want more recognition from other people than employees for whom “Security” is very important. The respondents ranking the “Security” value first prefer material incentives, but they also prefer to set challenging goals and achieve them. C o n c l u s i o n s . In the rating of value orientations among the heads of scientific and clinical departments, there are divergent values of “Self-Direction” and “Security”, which increases the risk of professional burnout. The priority motives of mid-level executives were identified. The data obtained during the CC monitoring can be used for the development of communication strategies within the clinic (including in the distribution of functional responsibilities), as well as for image-building activities aimed at the external environment.","PeriodicalId":346599,"journal":{"name":"Manager Zdravoochranenia","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Manager Zdravoochranenia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21045/1811-0185-2022-10-42-50","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Relevance. The N. V. Sklifosovsky Research Institute for Emergency Medicine is a leading multidisciplinary medical institution with a unique corporate culture. In its established work team, the heads of departments are carriers and indicators of values for the employees. P u r p o s e . To study the values of the heads of departments. M e t h o d s . Anonymous survey among two groups of heads: GrS (scientific departments) and GrC (clinical departments) using the methodology of assessing the value profile (questionnaires: SVS‑57, PVQ‑47) and labor motives (Martin-Ritchie questionnaire). F i n d i n g s . The questionnaires were filled out by 25 heads, of which GrS – 11 people (44%), GrC – 14 (56%). According to the Schwartz questionnaire, in the GrS, “Self-Direction” was in the first place in the value profile rating, “Benevolence” was in the second place, “Security” was in the third, and in the GrC, “Security” was in the first place, “Benevolence” was in the second, “Self-Direction” was in the third. Regression analysis was carried out in the general group: clustering was determined by the indicator “Universalism” (0.13). Its strong correlation with “Security” was revealed (k=0.73, p<0.01). According to the Martin-Ritchie questionnaire, the main motivating factor for people is the feeling of their own relevance in interesting and socially useful activities. In particular, the respondents for whom “Security” is not a priority want more recognition from other people than employees for whom “Security” is very important. The respondents ranking the “Security” value first prefer material incentives, but they also prefer to set challenging goals and achieve them. C o n c l u s i o n s . In the rating of value orientations among the heads of scientific and clinical departments, there are divergent values of “Self-Direction” and “Security”, which increases the risk of professional burnout. The priority motives of mid-level executives were identified. The data obtained during the CC monitoring can be used for the development of communication strategies within the clinic (including in the distribution of functional responsibilities), as well as for image-building activities aimed at the external environment.
医疗机构企业文化的研究和发展方法
的相关性。斯克利福索夫斯基急诊医学研究所是一家领先的多学科医疗机构,拥有独特的企业文化。在其建立的工作团队中,部门负责人是员工价值观的载体和指标。P, P, P, P, P。研究部门主管的价值观。我想我应该去找她。采用评估价值概况(问卷:SVS - 57、PVQ - 47)和劳动动机(Martin-Ritchie问卷)的方法,对GrS(科学部门)和GrC(临床部门)两组负责人进行匿名调查。如果我发现了它。问卷由25名学生填写,其中GrS - 11人(44%),GrC - 14人(56%)。根据Schwartz问卷,在GrS中,“自我导向”在价值概况评分中排名第一,“仁爱”排名第二,“安全”排名第三,而在GrC中,“安全”排名第一,“仁爱”排名第二,“自我导向”排名第三。对普通组进行回归分析,以指标“Universalism”(0.13)确定聚类。与“Security”有较强的相关性(k=0.73, p<0.01)。根据马丁-里奇问卷调查,人们的主要激励因素是在有趣的和对社会有益的活动中感受到自己的相关性。特别是,那些不把“安全”放在首位的受访者,比那些非常重视“安全”的员工更希望得到其他人的认可。将“安全感”排在第一位的受访者更喜欢物质激励,但他们也更喜欢设定具有挑战性的目标并实现它们。我想我的孩子们都是这样的。在科学科主任和临床科主任的价值取向评分中,“自我导向”和“安全”的价值取向存在差异,这增加了职业倦怠的风险。确定了中层管理人员的优先动机。在CC监测期间获得的数据可用于制定诊所内的沟通策略(包括职能职责的分配),以及针对外部环境的形象塑造活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信