Do International Investment Agreements Attract Foreign Direct Investment into Developing Countries?

Z. Zimny
{"title":"Do International Investment Agreements Attract Foreign Direct Investment into Developing Countries?","authors":"Z. Zimny","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2435666","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study is concerned with answering a question: what is the role of international investment agreements (IIAs) in attracting foreign direct investment (FDI) into developing countries? It reviews the literature on the impact of IIAs on the size of FDI into developing countries to the extent, to which such literature exists. This is the case for bilateral investment treaties (BITs) and regional integration agreements, but less so for bilateral free trade agreements (FTAs), nowadays including also investment provisions. In the absence of the literature the study relies on the conceptual discussion of possible impacts. Needless to say the literature, especially that on the impact of BITs on FDI, is not only far from reaching definite conclusions but also has come to conflicting findings. The study offers an own assessment of these findings and of the likely impact of IIAs on FDI. As regards the impact of BITs, the study concludes that there is evidence that BITs have played a role in a number of individual FDI projects, thus increasing FDI, but apparently these increases have not been large enough to be captured in aggregated flows of FDI used in most econometric studies. But in their rather narrow responsibilities, BITs constitute one of the most solid, although quite small, components of a coherent, transparent, predictable and stable investment framework of developing countries. Other agreements, and notably regional integration agreements, including investment and trade provisions, lead to new FDI. The impact is more evident in the case of FDI from outside of the economic grouping. EIIAs can also stimulate some intra-regional FDI. The latter impact can be strong when EIIA membership includes both developed and developing or transition countries.","PeriodicalId":365224,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Investment (Topic)","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: Investment (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2435666","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The study is concerned with answering a question: what is the role of international investment agreements (IIAs) in attracting foreign direct investment (FDI) into developing countries? It reviews the literature on the impact of IIAs on the size of FDI into developing countries to the extent, to which such literature exists. This is the case for bilateral investment treaties (BITs) and regional integration agreements, but less so for bilateral free trade agreements (FTAs), nowadays including also investment provisions. In the absence of the literature the study relies on the conceptual discussion of possible impacts. Needless to say the literature, especially that on the impact of BITs on FDI, is not only far from reaching definite conclusions but also has come to conflicting findings. The study offers an own assessment of these findings and of the likely impact of IIAs on FDI. As regards the impact of BITs, the study concludes that there is evidence that BITs have played a role in a number of individual FDI projects, thus increasing FDI, but apparently these increases have not been large enough to be captured in aggregated flows of FDI used in most econometric studies. But in their rather narrow responsibilities, BITs constitute one of the most solid, although quite small, components of a coherent, transparent, predictable and stable investment framework of developing countries. Other agreements, and notably regional integration agreements, including investment and trade provisions, lead to new FDI. The impact is more evident in the case of FDI from outside of the economic grouping. EIIAs can also stimulate some intra-regional FDI. The latter impact can be strong when EIIA membership includes both developed and developing or transition countries.
国际投资协定能吸引外国直接投资进入发展中国家吗?
这项研究的目的是回答一个问题:国际投资协定在吸引外国直接投资进入发展中国家方面的作用是什么?它审查了关于国际投资协定对进入发展中国家的外国直接投资规模的影响的文献,这些文献存在的程度。双边投资协定(BITs)和区域一体化协定就是这种情况,但双边自由贸易协定(FTAs)的情况就不那么严重了,如今双边自由贸易协定也包括投资条款。在缺乏文献的情况下,研究依赖于对可能影响的概念性讨论。不用说,文献,特别是关于双边投资协定对外国直接投资影响的文献,不仅远没有得出明确的结论,而且得出了相互矛盾的结论。本研究对这些发现以及国际投资协定对外国直接投资可能产生的影响提出了自己的评估。关于双边投资协定的影响,该研究的结论是,有证据表明,双边投资协定在若干个别外国直接投资项目中发挥了作用,从而增加了外国直接投资,但显然,这些增加的幅度还不够大,无法在大多数计量经济学研究中使用的外国直接投资的总流量中反映出来。但是,由于它们的职责相当有限,双边投资协定构成了发展中国家连贯、透明、可预测和稳定的投资框架中最坚实的组成部分之一,尽管规模很小。其他协定,特别是区域一体化协定,包括投资和贸易条款,导致新的外国直接投资。这种影响在来自经济集团以外的外国直接投资的情况下更为明显。环境投资投资也能刺激一些区域内的外国直接投资。当EIIA成员既包括发达国家,也包括发展中国家或转型国家时,后者的影响可能会很强。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信