Marginal bone level evaluation for combined tooth-implant retained Kennedy Class I Partial denture versus implant retained partial denture using extracoronal attachments

A. Shaaban, Bassem Mohsen, A. Fawzy, S. Amgad
{"title":"Marginal bone level evaluation for combined tooth-implant retained Kennedy Class I Partial denture versus implant retained partial denture using extracoronal attachments","authors":"A. Shaaban, Bassem Mohsen, A. Fawzy, S. Amgad","doi":"10.21608/aadj.2019.76491","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: This study was conducted to evaluate and compare marginal bone level for Tooth-implant supported Kennedy class I partial denture compared to implant supported Kennedy class I partial denture using extracoronal attachments.  Subjects and Methods : Ten male partially edentulous patients (Kennedy class I) with the canines are the last standing abutments were selected and all patients were rehabilitated with metallic partial denture supported by osseointegrated implants one on each side of the arch positioned in the premolar area and were randomly divided into two equal groups according to type of abutments, Group I; Patients were rehabilitated with Tooth Implant Retained partial denture with extra coronal attachment, Group II; Patients were rehabilitated with splinted Implant Retained partial denture with extra coronal attachment on each side. Evaluation by measuring marginal bone level for last main abutments was made at the time of insertion, after 6 month, after 12 month and last after 18 month using radiographic evaluation. Results: Partial dentures retained by two splinted implants showed better non-significant difference in marginal bone loss as compared with tooth implant retained Partial dentures. Conclusion: Using tooth implant retained partial dentures shows better effect on supporting structure as compared compared with tooth implant retained Partial dentures.","PeriodicalId":136230,"journal":{"name":"Al-Azhar Assiut Dental Journal","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al-Azhar Assiut Dental Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/aadj.2019.76491","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: This study was conducted to evaluate and compare marginal bone level for Tooth-implant supported Kennedy class I partial denture compared to implant supported Kennedy class I partial denture using extracoronal attachments.  Subjects and Methods : Ten male partially edentulous patients (Kennedy class I) with the canines are the last standing abutments were selected and all patients were rehabilitated with metallic partial denture supported by osseointegrated implants one on each side of the arch positioned in the premolar area and were randomly divided into two equal groups according to type of abutments, Group I; Patients were rehabilitated with Tooth Implant Retained partial denture with extra coronal attachment, Group II; Patients were rehabilitated with splinted Implant Retained partial denture with extra coronal attachment on each side. Evaluation by measuring marginal bone level for last main abutments was made at the time of insertion, after 6 month, after 12 month and last after 18 month using radiographic evaluation. Results: Partial dentures retained by two splinted implants showed better non-significant difference in marginal bone loss as compared with tooth implant retained Partial dentures. Conclusion: Using tooth implant retained partial dentures shows better effect on supporting structure as compared compared with tooth implant retained Partial dentures.
结合种植体-种植体保留的Kennedy I类局部义齿与使用冠外附着体的种植体保留部分义齿的边缘骨水平评价
目的:本研究旨在评估和比较种植体支持的Kennedy I类义齿与种植体支持的Kennedy I类义齿的边缘骨水平。对象与方法:选择10例男性部分无牙患者(Kennedy I类),以犬为最后站立基牙,所有患者均采用金属义齿修复,并在前磨牙区放置骨整合种植体,每侧弓1个,根据基牙类型随机分为两组:I组;第二组采用种植体冠外附着体义齿修复;患者采用夹板种植保留部分义齿修复,每侧冠状外附着体。在插入时、6个月后、12个月后和18个月后分别测量最后一个主基台的边缘骨水平进行x线评估。结果:两种种植体夹板固位的局部义齿与种植体固位的局部义齿相比,在边缘骨质流失方面差异无统计学意义。结论:种植体固位局部义齿与种植体固位局部义齿相比,具有更好的支撑结构效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信