Barriers to Access of Medical Abortion in Brazil: The Role of Resistance by Obstetricians and Gynaecologists

A. Faúndes
{"title":"Barriers to Access of Medical Abortion in Brazil: The Role of Resistance by Obstetricians and Gynaecologists","authors":"A. Faúndes","doi":"10.23880/whsj-16000138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: According the WHO, not only gynaecologists but also other physicians, midwives and nurses can provide abortion services as safe and effectively as specialist. Considering the number of willing providers of legal abortion is limited, it is important to know the opinion of Ob & Gyn specialists regarding prescription of misoprostol for voluntary termination of pregnancy (VTP) by other professionals. Study Design: A multicenter cross-sectional study carried out in 21 teaching hospitals in Brazil, aiming to determine who should be allowed to prescribe misoprostol for voluntary termination of pregnancy from the perspective of 407 residents in Obstetrics and Gynaecology who returned a self-responded questionnaire, 404 completed and three blank. Result(s): Less than 8% of residents stated that other doctors besides specialists should be allowed to prescribe misoprostol for VTP. The proportion of residents who agreed to allow any physician to prescribe misoprostol for VTP was twice as large for those who had received information about the use of misoprostol in medical residency (15.1%). The logistic regression indicated that being male, in stable marital union and not giving very much importance to religion were significantly associated with agreement to allow any physician to prescribe misoprostol for voluntary termination of pregnancy. Conclusion(s): The results showed an extremely low acceptance of non-specialist or midwives and nurses to prescribe misoprostol for VTP, which is against the WHO recommendations and world experience. We believe that contrasting such behavior with evidence-based recommendations may help to change such restrictive positions in a not so distant future.","PeriodicalId":396251,"journal":{"name":"Women's Health Science Journal","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Women's Health Science Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23880/whsj-16000138","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: According the WHO, not only gynaecologists but also other physicians, midwives and nurses can provide abortion services as safe and effectively as specialist. Considering the number of willing providers of legal abortion is limited, it is important to know the opinion of Ob & Gyn specialists regarding prescription of misoprostol for voluntary termination of pregnancy (VTP) by other professionals. Study Design: A multicenter cross-sectional study carried out in 21 teaching hospitals in Brazil, aiming to determine who should be allowed to prescribe misoprostol for voluntary termination of pregnancy from the perspective of 407 residents in Obstetrics and Gynaecology who returned a self-responded questionnaire, 404 completed and three blank. Result(s): Less than 8% of residents stated that other doctors besides specialists should be allowed to prescribe misoprostol for VTP. The proportion of residents who agreed to allow any physician to prescribe misoprostol for VTP was twice as large for those who had received information about the use of misoprostol in medical residency (15.1%). The logistic regression indicated that being male, in stable marital union and not giving very much importance to religion were significantly associated with agreement to allow any physician to prescribe misoprostol for voluntary termination of pregnancy. Conclusion(s): The results showed an extremely low acceptance of non-specialist or midwives and nurses to prescribe misoprostol for VTP, which is against the WHO recommendations and world experience. We believe that contrasting such behavior with evidence-based recommendations may help to change such restrictive positions in a not so distant future.
巴西获得药物流产的障碍:妇产科医生的抵制作用
目的:根据世界卫生组织,不仅是妇科医生,其他医生、助产士和护士也可以像专家一样安全有效地提供堕胎服务。考虑到自愿合法堕胎的提供者数量有限,了解妇产科专家对其他专业人员开具米索前列醇自愿终止妊娠(VTP)的意见是很重要的。研究设计:在巴西21所教学医院开展了一项多中心横断面研究,旨在从407名妇产科住院医师的角度确定谁应该被允许开米索前列醇用于自愿终止妊娠,这些住院医师填写了404份自填问卷,3份空白问卷。结果:只有不到8%的居民认为应该允许专科医生以外的其他医生开米索前列醇治疗VTP。同意允许医生开具米索前列醇治疗VTP的居民比例是在住院医师中了解米索前列醇使用信息的居民的两倍(15.1%)。逻辑回归表明,男性、稳定的婚姻关系和不太重视宗教信仰与允许任何医生为自愿终止妊娠开米索前列醇的协议显著相关。结论:结果显示,非专科医生或助产士和护士对VTP处方米索前列醇的接受度极低,这违背了世界卫生组织的建议和世界经验。我们相信,将这种行为与基于证据的建议进行对比,可能有助于在不久的将来改变这种限制性立场。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信