Seismic shaking scenarios for city of Zagreb, Croatia

Helena Latečki, J. Stipčević, I. Molinari
{"title":"Seismic shaking scenarios for city of Zagreb, Croatia","authors":"Helena Latečki, J. Stipčević, I. Molinari","doi":"10.5194/EGUSPHERE-EGU21-8781","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In order to assess the seismic shaking levels, following the strong Zagreb March 22nd 2020 earthquake, we compute broadband seismograms using a hybrid technique. In a hybrid technique, low frequency (LF, f < 1 Hz) and high frequency (HF, f = 1&#8211;10 Hz) seismograms are obtained separately and then merged into a single time series. The LF part of seismogram is computed using a deterministic approach while for the HF part, we adopt the semi-stochastic method following the work of Graves and Pitarka (2010). For the purposes of the simulation, we also assemble the 3D velocity and density model of the crust for the city of Zagreb and its surrounding region. The model consists of a detailed description of the main geologic structures that are observed in the upper crust and is embedded within a greater regional EPCrust crustal model (Molinari and Morelli, 2011). To test and evaluate its performance, we apply the hybrid technique to the Zagreb March 22nd 2020 Mw = 5.3 event and four smaller (3.0 < Mw < 5.0) events. We compare the measured seismograms with the synthetic data and validate our results by assessing the goodness of fit for the peak ground velocity values and the shaking duration. Furthermore, since the 1880 Mw = 6.2 historic earthquake significantly contributes to the hazard assessment for the wider Zagreb area, we compute synthetic seismograms for this event at two different hypocenter locations. We calculate broadband waveforms on a dense grid of points and from these we plot the shakemaps to determine if the main expected ground-motion features are well-represented by our approach. Lastly, due to the events that occured in the Petrinja epicentral area at the end of 2020, we decided to extend our 3D model to cover the area of interest. We will present the preliminary results of the simulation for the December 29th 2020 Mw = 6.4 strong earthquake, as well as our plans for further research.</p>","PeriodicalId":142267,"journal":{"name":"1st Croatian Conference on Earthquake Engineering","volume":"117 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"1st Croatian Conference on Earthquake Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/EGUSPHERE-EGU21-8781","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In order to assess the seismic shaking levels, following the strong Zagreb March 22nd 2020 earthquake, we compute broadband seismograms using a hybrid technique. In a hybrid technique, low frequency (LF, f < 1 Hz) and high frequency (HF, f = 1–10 Hz) seismograms are obtained separately and then merged into a single time series. The LF part of seismogram is computed using a deterministic approach while for the HF part, we adopt the semi-stochastic method following the work of Graves and Pitarka (2010). For the purposes of the simulation, we also assemble the 3D velocity and density model of the crust for the city of Zagreb and its surrounding region. The model consists of a detailed description of the main geologic structures that are observed in the upper crust and is embedded within a greater regional EPCrust crustal model (Molinari and Morelli, 2011). To test and evaluate its performance, we apply the hybrid technique to the Zagreb March 22nd 2020 Mw = 5.3 event and four smaller (3.0 < Mw < 5.0) events. We compare the measured seismograms with the synthetic data and validate our results by assessing the goodness of fit for the peak ground velocity values and the shaking duration. Furthermore, since the 1880 Mw = 6.2 historic earthquake significantly contributes to the hazard assessment for the wider Zagreb area, we compute synthetic seismograms for this event at two different hypocenter locations. We calculate broadband waveforms on a dense grid of points and from these we plot the shakemaps to determine if the main expected ground-motion features are well-represented by our approach. Lastly, due to the events that occured in the Petrinja epicentral area at the end of 2020, we decided to extend our 3D model to cover the area of interest. We will present the preliminary results of the simulation for the December 29th 2020 Mw = 6.4 strong earthquake, as well as our plans for further research.

克罗地亚萨格勒布市的地震情景
为了评估地震震动水平,在2020年3月22日萨格勒布强烈地震之后,我们使用混合技术计算宽带地震记录。在混合技术中,分别获得低频(LF, f < 1 Hz)和高频(HF, f = 1–10 Hz)地震图,然后合并成单个时间序列。地震记录的低频部分采用确定性方法计算,而高频部分采用半随机方法,这是根据Graves和Pitarka(2010)的工作。为了模拟的目的,我们还为萨格勒布市及其周边地区组装了地壳的三维速度和密度模型。该模型包括对上地壳中观测到的主要地质结构的详细描述,并嵌入到更大的区域EPCrust地壳模型中(Molinari和Morelli, 2011)。为了测试和评估其性能,我们将混合技术应用于萨格勒布2020年3月22日Mw = 5.3事件和四个较小的(3.0 < Mw < 5.0)事件。我们将实测地震图与合成数据进行了比较,并通过评估峰值地面速度值和震动持续时间的拟合度来验证我们的结果。此外,由于1880年Mw = 6.2级历史地震对更广泛的萨格勒布地区的危害评估有重要贡献,我们计算了两个不同震源位置的该事件的合成地震记录。我们在密集的点网格上计算宽带波形,并从中绘制震动图,以确定我们的方法是否能很好地表示预期的主要地面运动特征。最后,由于2020年底在Petrinja震中地区发生的事件,我们决定扩展我们的3D模型以覆盖感兴趣的区域。我们将介绍2020年12月29日发生的Mw = 6.4级强震的初步模拟结果,以及我们进一步研究的计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信