Dissection of basal cisterns for treatment of severe traumatic brain injury

A. Stanishevskiy, K. Babichev, S. Gizatullin, D. V. Svistov, I. Onnitsev, D. Davydov
{"title":"Dissection of basal cisterns for treatment of severe traumatic brain injury","authors":"A. Stanishevskiy, K. Babichev, S. Gizatullin, D. V. Svistov, I. Onnitsev, D. Davydov","doi":"10.17650/1683-3295-2022-24-4-111-117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. According to WHO, severe traumatic brain injury is among the top ten leading causes of death worldwide. Despite the centuries‑old history of development of the treatment methods to patients with traumatic brain injury their results according to large randomized studies remain unsatisfactory – mortality and severe disability are observed in more than 50 % of patients. Some experimental studies indicate that decompressive craniectomy can aggravate the severity of cerebral edema by creating conditions for traction of nerve fibers and can lead to hemorrhagic transformation of injury foci and ischemia. During the last decade, experimental studies and technological progress have significantly expanded the understanding of brain normal and pathological physiology and made it possible to develop new methods of surgical interventions. In particular, a number of publications have shown significant advantages of dissection of arachnoid spaces of brain base in case of severe traumatic brain injury as compared with classical decompressive craniectomy.Aim. To analyze the literature data on pathophysiological justification, surgery technique and results of dissection of arachnoid spaces of the brain base in case of severe traumatic brain injury as well as the advantages and disadvantages of the method as compared with standard treatment methods of such patients.Materials and methods. Literature search through in the main databases was carried out. The methods of opening of basal subarachnoid spaces in case of severe traumatic brain injury, pathophysiological justification and surgery techniques as well as results of clinical studies of the techniques employed are analyzed.Results. Information on pathogenesis of cerebral edema and pathophysiological justification of effectiveness of opening of brain base cisterns for treatment of traumatic brain injury, data on cisternostomy surgery technique and results were revealed, systematized and analyzed. Publications of individual clinical cases and series of observations indicate acceptable results of cisternostomy in comparison with decompressive craniectomy for treatment of traumatic brain injury.Conclusions. Dissection of arachnoid spaces of the brain base with perforation of the terminal plate and the Liliequist membrane is a promising method of surgical treatment of severe traumatic brain injury.","PeriodicalId":197162,"journal":{"name":"Russian journal of neurosurgery","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Russian journal of neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17650/1683-3295-2022-24-4-111-117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background. According to WHO, severe traumatic brain injury is among the top ten leading causes of death worldwide. Despite the centuries‑old history of development of the treatment methods to patients with traumatic brain injury their results according to large randomized studies remain unsatisfactory – mortality and severe disability are observed in more than 50 % of patients. Some experimental studies indicate that decompressive craniectomy can aggravate the severity of cerebral edema by creating conditions for traction of nerve fibers and can lead to hemorrhagic transformation of injury foci and ischemia. During the last decade, experimental studies and technological progress have significantly expanded the understanding of brain normal and pathological physiology and made it possible to develop new methods of surgical interventions. In particular, a number of publications have shown significant advantages of dissection of arachnoid spaces of brain base in case of severe traumatic brain injury as compared with classical decompressive craniectomy.Aim. To analyze the literature data on pathophysiological justification, surgery technique and results of dissection of arachnoid spaces of the brain base in case of severe traumatic brain injury as well as the advantages and disadvantages of the method as compared with standard treatment methods of such patients.Materials and methods. Literature search through in the main databases was carried out. The methods of opening of basal subarachnoid spaces in case of severe traumatic brain injury, pathophysiological justification and surgery techniques as well as results of clinical studies of the techniques employed are analyzed.Results. Information on pathogenesis of cerebral edema and pathophysiological justification of effectiveness of opening of brain base cisterns for treatment of traumatic brain injury, data on cisternostomy surgery technique and results were revealed, systematized and analyzed. Publications of individual clinical cases and series of observations indicate acceptable results of cisternostomy in comparison with decompressive craniectomy for treatment of traumatic brain injury.Conclusions. Dissection of arachnoid spaces of the brain base with perforation of the terminal plate and the Liliequist membrane is a promising method of surgical treatment of severe traumatic brain injury.
基底池解剖治疗重型颅脑外伤
背景。据世界卫生组织称,严重创伤性脑损伤是全世界十大主要死亡原因之一。尽管创伤性脑损伤患者的治疗方法已有数百年的发展历史,但根据大型随机研究,其结果仍不令人满意-在50%以上的患者中观察到死亡和严重残疾。有实验研究表明,颅骨减压术可为神经纤维牵拉创造条件,加重脑水肿的严重程度,并可导致损伤灶出血性转化和缺血。在过去的十年中,实验研究和技术进步极大地扩展了对脑正常和病理生理学的理解,并使开发新的手术干预方法成为可能。特别是,许多出版物表明,在严重创伤性脑损伤病例中,颅底蛛网膜间隙清扫术与传统的减压开颅术相比具有显著的优势。分析重型颅脑外伤患者颅底蛛网膜间隙清扫术的病理生理依据、手术技术及结果的文献资料,并与该类患者的标准治疗方法比较其优缺点。材料和方法。在主要数据库中进行文献检索。分析了重型颅脑外伤开放蛛网膜下腔的方法、病理生理依据、手术技术及临床研究结果。对脑水肿的发病机制、颅底池开放治疗外伤性脑损伤疗效的病理生理依据、脑池造口术的技术和结果等资料进行了揭示、整理和分析。发表的个别临床病例和一系列观察结果表明,与去骨瓣减压术相比,脑池造口术治疗外伤性脑损伤的效果可以接受。颅底蛛网膜间隙与终板及利利奎斯特膜穿孔分离是一种很有前途的外科治疗重型颅脑损伤的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信