Comparison of music, unitary ESPRIT, and SAGE algorithms for estimating 3D angles in wireless channels

Rui Feng, Yu Liu, Jie Huang, Jian Sun, Chengxiang Wang
{"title":"Comparison of music, unitary ESPRIT, and SAGE algorithms for estimating 3D angles in wireless channels","authors":"Rui Feng, Yu Liu, Jie Huang, Jian Sun, Chengxiang Wang","doi":"10.1109/ICCChina.2017.8330333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Joint estimation of azimuth and elevation angles is of great importance in source localization and channel characterization. Firstly, some basic knowledge of three typical parametric estimation algorithms are introduced in this paper, i.e., multiple signal classification (MUSIC), Unitary estimation of signal parameter via rotational invariance technique (ESPRIT), and space-alternating generalized expectation-maximization (SAGE) algorithms. Each algorithm is capable of extracting both azimuth angle of arrival (AAoA) and elevation angle of arrival (EAoA) of multi-paths jointly. It is pointed out that the SAGE and MUSIC algorithms have higher complexity than the Unitary ESPRIT algorithm due to the iteration/angle searching procedure. Secondly, impacts of antenna number, closely spaced paths, and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) on estimation performance of three algorithms are analyzed. Results show that the Unitary ESPRIT algorithm has lower accuracy in comparison with the MUSIC and SAGE algorithms when antenna number and SNR are large. Finally, three algorithms are applied to estimate multipath parameters in 16 GHz massive MIMO channel measurements. It is shown that the Unitary ESPRIT algorithm performs less satisfactory in MPCs extraction, while MUSIC can provide comparable results with the SAGE algorithm.","PeriodicalId":418396,"journal":{"name":"2017 IEEE/CIC International Conference on Communications in China (ICCC)","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 IEEE/CIC International Conference on Communications in China (ICCC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCChina.2017.8330333","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Joint estimation of azimuth and elevation angles is of great importance in source localization and channel characterization. Firstly, some basic knowledge of three typical parametric estimation algorithms are introduced in this paper, i.e., multiple signal classification (MUSIC), Unitary estimation of signal parameter via rotational invariance technique (ESPRIT), and space-alternating generalized expectation-maximization (SAGE) algorithms. Each algorithm is capable of extracting both azimuth angle of arrival (AAoA) and elevation angle of arrival (EAoA) of multi-paths jointly. It is pointed out that the SAGE and MUSIC algorithms have higher complexity than the Unitary ESPRIT algorithm due to the iteration/angle searching procedure. Secondly, impacts of antenna number, closely spaced paths, and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) on estimation performance of three algorithms are analyzed. Results show that the Unitary ESPRIT algorithm has lower accuracy in comparison with the MUSIC and SAGE algorithms when antenna number and SNR are large. Finally, three algorithms are applied to estimate multipath parameters in 16 GHz massive MIMO channel measurements. It is shown that the Unitary ESPRIT algorithm performs less satisfactory in MPCs extraction, while MUSIC can provide comparable results with the SAGE algorithm.
比较音乐,统一ESPRIT,和SAGE算法估计三维角度在无线信道
方位角和仰角的联合估计在信源定位和信道表征中具有重要意义。本文首先介绍了三种典型的参数估计算法的基本知识,即多信号分类(MUSIC)、旋转不变性技术对信号参数的幺正估计(ESPRIT)和空间交替广义期望最大化(SAGE)算法。每种算法都能同时提取多路径的到达方位角和到达仰角。指出SAGE和MUSIC算法由于存在迭代/角度搜索过程,比单一ESPRIT算法具有更高的复杂度。其次,分析了天线数、近距离路径和信噪比对三种算法估计性能的影响。结果表明,当天线数和信噪比较大时,统一ESPRIT算法的精度低于MUSIC和SAGE算法。最后,应用三种算法估计了16ghz大规模MIMO信道测量中的多径参数。结果表明,Unitary ESPRIT算法在MPCs提取上的效果不如SAGE算法好,而MUSIC算法可以提供与SAGE算法相当的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信