Canada's Foreign Policy on Nuclear Technology Development and Proliferation

Mark Thomas Resmini
{"title":"Canada's Foreign Policy on Nuclear Technology Development and Proliferation","authors":"Mark Thomas Resmini","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2601499","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Canada has followed an ambiguous path with respect to its policy on nuclear weapons as a result of maintaining a Nuclear Division within its Foreign Affairs Department – which promotes disarmament and non-proliferation – while simultaneously, selling nuclear technology, such as that produced by Candu Energy Inc., that might be used for weapons production. There is a need to understand the rationale for this approach to Canada’s foreign policy on disarmament and non-proliferation and for why Canada continues to support the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). This major research paper analyzes whether a contradiction between policy and action exists, and what approach best explains the presence or absence of a contradiction. The central argument is that Canada’s foreign policy framework is based in a realist position, wherein Canada’s successive leaders have recognized the inherent risk in being geographically situated next to a hegemon. No political contradiction between Canada’s economic interests and the country’s ongoing support for the NPT was observed, predominantly due to its requirements to meet its own economic obligations in a changing world, and to ensure that its foreign policies are aligned with those of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO). A unique Canadian strategic vision was identified, in that, the country is able to subsume its own identity in order to support the identities of other nations as the government of Canada has seen fit. Presently, it serves Canada well to maintain its staunch position on disarmament and non-proliferation, as it can and does rely heavily on the deterrence factor of the American armament.","PeriodicalId":243835,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Law eJournal","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2601499","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Canada has followed an ambiguous path with respect to its policy on nuclear weapons as a result of maintaining a Nuclear Division within its Foreign Affairs Department – which promotes disarmament and non-proliferation – while simultaneously, selling nuclear technology, such as that produced by Candu Energy Inc., that might be used for weapons production. There is a need to understand the rationale for this approach to Canada’s foreign policy on disarmament and non-proliferation and for why Canada continues to support the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). This major research paper analyzes whether a contradiction between policy and action exists, and what approach best explains the presence or absence of a contradiction. The central argument is that Canada’s foreign policy framework is based in a realist position, wherein Canada’s successive leaders have recognized the inherent risk in being geographically situated next to a hegemon. No political contradiction between Canada’s economic interests and the country’s ongoing support for the NPT was observed, predominantly due to its requirements to meet its own economic obligations in a changing world, and to ensure that its foreign policies are aligned with those of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO). A unique Canadian strategic vision was identified, in that, the country is able to subsume its own identity in order to support the identities of other nations as the government of Canada has seen fit. Presently, it serves Canada well to maintain its staunch position on disarmament and non-proliferation, as it can and does rely heavily on the deterrence factor of the American armament.
加拿大关于核技术发展和扩散的外交政策
加拿大在其核武器政策方面走了一条模棱两可的道路,因为它在其外交部内维持一个促进裁军和不扩散的核司,同时又出售可能用于武器生产的核技术,例如坎杜能源公司生产的核技术。有必要了解对加拿大裁军和不扩散外交政策采取这种做法的理由,以及加拿大继续支持《不扩散核武器条约》(不扩散条约)的原因。这篇主要的研究论文分析了政策和行动之间是否存在矛盾,以及什么方法最能解释矛盾的存在或不存在。核心论点是,加拿大的外交政策框架是以现实主义立场为基础的,加拿大的历届领导人都认识到,在地理位置上与霸权为邻是一种固有的风险。没有观察到加拿大的经济利益与该国对《不扩散条约》的持续支持之间存在政治矛盾,这主要是因为它需要在不断变化的世界中履行其自身的经济义务,并确保其外交政策与北大西洋公约组织(北约组织)的外交政策保持一致。确定了加拿大独特的战略愿景,即该国能够将自己的身份纳入其中,以便在加拿大政府认为合适的情况下支持其他国家的身份。目前,保持其在裁军和不扩散问题上的坚定立场对加拿大很有好处,因为它能够而且确实在很大程度上依赖美国军备的威慑因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信